Daily Archives: February 4, 2016

Reason.com: Fourth Amendment Protections for Emails Inch Forward in Congress

Reason.com: Fourth Amendment Protections for Emails Inch Forward in Congress by Scott Shackford: Legislation would require warrants for old communications. There is a big, huge gap in your Fourth Amendment protection against government searches without a warrant that goes all … Continue reading

Posted in E-mail | Comments Off on Reason.com: Fourth Amendment Protections for Emails Inch Forward in Congress

Voice of San Diego: Watchdog Group Urges Sheriff to Tweak New Body Camera Policies

Voice of San Diego: Watchdog Group Urges Sheriff to Tweak New Body Camera Policies by Kelly Davis: When should an officer be allowed to review body camera footage? Before writing an incident report or after?

Posted in Body cameras | Comments Off on Voice of San Diego: Watchdog Group Urges Sheriff to Tweak New Body Camera Policies

WaPo: Future of the exclusionary rule? Preview of Utah v. Strieff

WaPo: Preview of Utah v. Strieff by Orin Kerr: SCOTUSblog has posted a preview I authored about Utah v. Strieff, a Fourth Amendment case on the scope of the exclusionary rule. Here’s the introduction:

Posted in Exclusionary rule, SCOTUS | Comments Off on WaPo: Future of the exclusionary rule? Preview of Utah v. Strieff

CA6: Judicial immunity against false arrest damages case for judge ordering confinement for non-payment of fines

A municipal judge and clerk were absolutely immune from a damages claim for false arrest under § 1983 where the judge ordered the defendant to jail for nonpayment of fines. Even if wrong, they are judicial acts entitled to immunity. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens | Comments Off on CA6: Judicial immunity against false arrest damages case for judge ordering confinement for non-payment of fines

E.D.Mich.: “I know what you’re looking for, and all I have is a little weed” is reasonable suspicion

Officers in a “semi-marked vehicle” saw defendant on a street corner, and pulled up and stopped and asked him in a conversational tone what he was doing. “Defendant responded that he had just left the liquor store, that he already … Continue reading

Posted in Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: “I know what you’re looking for, and all I have is a little weed” is reasonable suspicion

CA3: Throwing three bags over a fence and walking away was an abandonment

Police wanted to talk to defendant in a child pornography investigation, and they learned he was at a storage unit he rented. When defendant saw the police, he threw three bags (“tote bag, a zippered duffel bag, and a wheeled … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA3: Throwing three bags over a fence and walking away was an abandonment

D.N.M.: While affiant wasn’t sworn, other witnesses were in testifying on application

Defendant consented to a search after being told of the right to refuse. Officers also sought a search warrant for a safe from a tribal judge, and the affiant wasn’t sworn to. Additional testimony was, however. The consent saves the … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on D.N.M.: While affiant wasn’t sworn, other witnesses were in testifying on application

W.D.Wash.: The govt didn’t violate the 4A by hacking into a child porn server and running it for two weeks, forwarding all user info to another govt computer

The government took over a child pornography website in Washington state and ran it for two weeks via a Title III warrant from a USMJ in the Eastern District of Virginia. They sent all information of visitors to that website … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, F.R.Crim.P. 41, Overbreadth | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: The govt didn’t violate the 4A by hacking into a child porn server and running it for two weeks, forwarding all user info to another govt computer