OH5: Can’t appeal a suppression issue that wasn’t dispositive of his case because it was merely advisory

Defendant couldn’t appeal a suppression issue that wasn’t dispositive of his case because it was merely advisory. State v. Cooley, 2015-Ohio-3904, 2015 Ohio App. LEXIS 3773 (5th Dist. September 23, 2015).

Defense consent was valid, and it was not based on a lie that the officers would get a search warrant; they only said that they could seek one. It’s doubtful defendant has standing in the attic of the building used for common storage. In any event, the landlord had apparent authority to consent. United States v. Crews, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 128609 (S.D.N.Y. June 8, 2015).*

This entry was posted in Consent. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.