Category Archives: Standards of review

N.D.Cal. & W.D.Wash.: Summons in IRS Bitcoin investigation should be limited as to years covered

The IRS summons in a cryptocurrency investigation, the government satisfied the Powell standard with the exception of a proper time limitation on the years covered. Similar is Zietzke v. United States, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 204274 (W.D. Wash. Nov. 25, … Continue reading →

Posted in Standards of review, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on N.D.Cal. & W.D.Wash.: Summons in IRS Bitcoin investigation should be limited as to years covered

TN: The 4A certified question doesn’t resolve the appeal, so appeal dismissed

The certified question related to consent to search was not dispositive to the outcome of the case for purposes of Tenn. R. Crim. P. 37(b)(2)(A). Even if defendant’s consent to search the home was constitutionally invalid and exigent circumstances did … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Standards of review | Comments Off on TN: The 4A certified question doesn’t resolve the appeal, so appeal dismissed

CO: After first SW for cell phone was suppressed for Franks violation, second was valid with independent source

Defendant was subjected to two search warrants for his cell phones in possession of the police. A motion to suppress the first search was granted because the officer recklessly included false information that deprived it of probable cause. The police … Continue reading →

Posted in Independent source, Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review | Comments Off on CO: After first SW for cell phone was suppressed for Franks violation, second was valid with independent source

TN: Defense counsel not ineffective for recommending guilty plea where motion to suppress denied and case would have gone to trial on other counts even if granted

Defendant challenges on post-conviction his counsel being ineffective in recommending a guilty plea after the motion to suppress was denied. Even if it had been granted, defendant was going to trial on other counts, and he can’t show that defense … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Standards of review | Comments Off on TN: Defense counsel not ineffective for recommending guilty plea where motion to suppress denied and case would have gone to trial on other counts even if granted

D.D.C.: No statute of limitations for equitable actions for return of property not forfeited

Plaintiff pro se and post-conviction filed a pleading for return of property. Some was forfeited, and it was treated as a motion to set aside the forfeitures. Some were not forfeited, and there is no statute of limitations for equitable … Continue reading →

Posted in Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Standards of review | Comments Off on D.D.C.: No statute of limitations for equitable actions for return of property not forfeited

D.Mass.: Attacking only GFE when court found both PC and GFE states no 2255 claim

The district court before conviction held that the search warrant was based on probable cause and the good faith exception would apply. In his 2255, defendant argues that defense counsel was ineffective for not better arguing the good faith exception. … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Standards of review | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Attacking only GFE when court found both PC and GFE states no 2255 claim

W.D.Mo.: How one USDJ views R&Rs in a 4A case; also, using social worker entry as pretext wasn’t unreasonable

“It may be worth commenting that the deputies may have subjectively used the social worker visit to pursue their interest in the reported firearm and drug violations — to the extent possible — just as traffic violations are often used … Continue reading →

Posted in Pretext, Standards of review | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: How one USDJ views R&Rs in a 4A case; also, using social worker entry as pretext wasn’t unreasonable

CA1: Govt showed nexus to house that drug dealers keep money, books, customer lists, and product there

The district court properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress because there was probable cause to issue the search warrant. It was likely that a drug dealer kept his money, books, and customer lists in a safe place like his residence, … Continue reading →

Posted in Nexus, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA1: Govt showed nexus to house that drug dealers keep money, books, customer lists, and product there

N.D.Ga.: [For the 10,000th time,] the standard of review of PC is whether there is a “substantial basis” for finding PC, not whether there actually is

“‘[T]he task of a reviewing court is not to conduct a de novo determination of probable cause, but only to determine whether there is substantial evidence in the record supporting the magistrate judge’s decision to issue the warrant.’ United States … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Standards of review | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: [For the 10,000th time,] the standard of review of PC is whether there is a “substantial basis” for finding PC, not whether there actually is

IA: Std of review of PC is not is there PC, but is there a substantial basis for believing there was PC

“Because the Fourth Amendment values the practice of obtaining a warrant to reduce the perception of intrusive police conduct, we do not strictly scrutinize the sufficiency of the underlying affidavit. … Instead, we decide whether the issuing magistrate had a … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review | Comments Off on IA: Std of review of PC is not is there PC, but is there a substantial basis for believing there was PC

CA8: SW for MJ in urine wasn’t stale by eight day wait to execute

The search warrant for defendant’s urine sample to prove he had marijuana in his system wasn’t stale after eight days. Staleness is determined by whether the probable cause for the warrant dissipates before execution. There was testimony in the record … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA8: SW for MJ in urine wasn’t stale by eight day wait to execute

D.D.C.: When serving SW in sex assault investigation where def was known to be a felon, a Glock speed loader in plain view permitted search for a gun

D.C. Metro police had a search warrant for evidence of a sexual assault. When they entered, they saw a Glock magazine speed loader. That caused them to search for a firearm because they knew defendant was a felon learning, that … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Plain view, feel, smell, Standards of review | Comments Off on D.D.C.: When serving SW in sex assault investigation where def was known to be a felon, a Glock speed loader in plain view permitted search for a gun

WI: Use of a tracking dog in a burglary that led to def’s house was reasonable and in hot pursuit

Police received a 4 am burglary call, and an officer with a dog tracking smell and the officer tracking footprints in the dew on the ground led to defendant’s property. The officer knocked and defendant’s mother let the police in. … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Dog sniff, Hot pursuit, Standards of review | Comments Off on WI: Use of a tracking dog in a burglary that led to def’s house was reasonable and in hot pursuit

N.D.Iowa: Std of review of PC for a warrant is not de novo

The standard of review of probable cause for a search warrant is not de novo—it’s whether there is a substantial basis for believing that evidence would be found. Here, “Although some of the information lacked detail, the volume and corroboration … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Standards of review | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Std of review of PC for a warrant is not de novo

DE: SW for drugs allows search anywhere drugs may be hidden

A search warrant for drugs authorizes a search any place where drugs may be hidden. The fact other things are found that are evidence allows their seizure, too. Jackson v. State, 2019 Del. LEXIS 456 (Oct. 8, 2019). U.S. Probation … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Scope of search, Standards of review | Comments Off on DE: SW for drugs allows search anywhere drugs may be hidden

FL5: Car search was justified by search incident; automobile exception finding not even appealed

Defendant’s traffic stop was justified for stopping in the crosswalk before turning on red. The search of the car was found by the trial court with probable cause and justified by the search incident doctrine and the automobile exception. Defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Search incident, Standards of review | Comments Off on FL5: Car search was justified by search incident; automobile exception finding not even appealed

OH6: Trial court didn’t commit plain error in not inquiring into drug dog’s training when defense didn’t

The trial court did not commit plain error in not inquiring into the drug dogs training when defendant didn’t raise it. State v. Jones, 2019-Ohio-3704, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 3777 (6th Dist. Sept. 16, 2019). The particulars of a drug … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Excessive force, Standards of review | Comments Off on OH6: Trial court didn’t commit plain error in not inquiring into drug dog’s training when defense didn’t

CA11: 4A IAC claim fails on merits of search issue

Petitioner’s IAC claim against defense counsel for not pursuing a Fourth Amendment claim was properly denied for lack of standing on the merits. Virgil v. Sec’y, Dept. of Corrections, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 23777 (11th Cir. Aug. 8, 2019).* Defendant’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA11: 4A IAC claim fails on merits of search issue

VA: 4A claim waived for failure to fully brief it

Defendant’s Fourth Amendment claim on appeal was waived by failure to fully argue it, as in “Fourth Amendment rights were violated because ….” Ducharme v. Commonwealth, 2019 Va. App. LEXIS 187 (Aug. 6, 2019):

Posted in Standards of review | Comments Off on VA: 4A claim waived for failure to fully brief it

CA4: Denial of post-trial Franks motion here subject to plain error review

Defendant’s motion for a Franks hearing came post-trial. The court of appeals declines to deny it for lack of timeliness and denies it on the merits. The Franks burden is heavy, and the record is scant. So, he’s relegated to … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA4: Denial of post-trial Franks motion here subject to plain error review