Category Archives: Staleness

NC: Undated Facebook screenshots as a part of PC showed enduring utility in what was sought, so not stale

Defendant’s argument is that Facebook screenshots showing probable cause in the affidavit for the search warrant don’t specify dates of the electronic data that’s being sought from his place. What was being sought is of enduring utility by its nature, … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on NC: Undated Facebook screenshots as a part of PC showed enduring utility in what was sought, so not stale

W.D.Ark.: 16 mo. delay in forensic search of electronics was not unreasonable; PC “remained viable”

The omitted facts from the affidavit for defendant’s child pornography search warrant had no bearing on the probable cause determination, so the Franks challenge fails. Defendant’s claim that the affidavit’s reference to two successful downloads of child pornography was false … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Probable cause, Staleness | Comments Off on W.D.Ark.: 16 mo. delay in forensic search of electronics was not unreasonable; PC “remained viable”

W.D.Pa.: Warrantless production of state ALPR data to FBI not governed by Carpenter

The FBI requested the state search its Automated License Plate Reader database for defendant’s LPN to trace the movement of his car. Carpenter simply cannot be made to apply to ALPR data. 106 records were found. United States v. Bowers, … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Informational privacy, Staleness, Surveillance technology, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Warrantless production of state ALPR data to FBI not governed by Carpenter

D.Alaska: SW affidavit accidentally in the jury room during deliberations wasn’t looked at so no error

The search warrant affidavit for the search warrant for defendant’s backpack accidentally went to the jury room in deliberations with the backpack. The court finds that this wasn’t error because 10 of the 12 jurors said they didn’t know that … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity, Staleness | Comments Off on D.Alaska: SW affidavit accidentally in the jury room during deliberations wasn’t looked at so no error

S.D.Cal.: NCIS obtained def’s phone passcode by 4A violation

NCIS obtained defendant’s passcode for his iPhone 6 by a Fourth Amendment violation by seeking to see him enter it when he was consciously trying to avoid them seeing it. Inevitable discovery also does not apply. United States v. Booker, … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Probable cause, Staleness | Comments Off on S.D.Cal.: NCIS obtained def’s phone passcode by 4A violation

OH1: Years-old information of trafficking with current info of personal use isn’t PC for trafficking

Where the officer’s affidavit consisted only of years-old stale information and present evidence of personal drug use, there was no probable cause to search the defendant’s residence for evidence of drug trafficking, and the trial court erred in applying the … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Staleness | Comments Off on OH1: Years-old information of trafficking with current info of personal use isn’t PC for trafficking

C.D.Ill.: Failure to execute state SW in 10 days doesn’t automatically trigger exclusionary rule

Failure to execute a state search warrant within 10 days (F.R.Crim.P. 41) where state law says 60 days does not automatically trigger the exclusionary rule. The affidavit for the warrant showed probable cause, and the good faith exception also applies. … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Staleness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on C.D.Ill.: Failure to execute state SW in 10 days doesn’t automatically trigger exclusionary rule

CA8: Taking box off FedEx conveyor belt for dog sniff didn’t deprive FedEx of custody

Moving a suspicious looking box from the FedEx conveyor belt to a back room for a dog sniff did not require reasonable suspicion nor did it deprive FedEx of custody of the box. The dog alert provided justification for a … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Mail and packages, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure, Staleness, Standing | Comments Off on CA8: Taking box off FedEx conveyor belt for dog sniff didn’t deprive FedEx of custody

CA7: Without a triggering condition, this was not an anticipatory warrant

Despite defendant’s argument, this was not an anticipatory search warrant. There was no triggering condition, and it was issued with probable cause. United States v. Calligan, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 23402 (7th Cir. Aug. 6, 2021). There clearly was reasonable … Continue reading →

Posted in Anticipatory warrant, Nexus, Qualified immunity, Staleness | Comments Off on CA7: Without a triggering condition, this was not an anticipatory warrant

OH1: Years old info of drug dealing coupled with current trash pull showing drug use was clearly stale; no GFE

Years old information of drug dealing in another county coupled with a trash pull of recent drug use (not trafficking) was stale, and the search warrant was clearly lacking probable cause. Therefore, the good faith exception does not apply. State … Continue reading →

Posted in Community caretaking function, Dog sniff, Reasonableness, Staleness | Comments Off on OH1: Years old info of drug dealing coupled with current trash pull showing drug use was clearly stale; no GFE

M.D.La.: Court finds RS for a traffic stop, so CI tip doesn’t have to be considered

“Turning to the facts of the instant case, the Court must resolve the central question: did Nations see Defendant commit a traffic violation? Having listened to Nations’ testimony, observed him in open court, and reviewed the video and written transcript … Continue reading →

Posted in Private search, Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on M.D.La.: Court finds RS for a traffic stop, so CI tip doesn’t have to be considered

S.D.N.Y.: Def’s response to a SDT showed records existed for later SW; not stale

Defendant’s receipt of and response to a subpoena for fraud records in an older fraud case established timeliness and lack of staleness when the government decided to proceed by search warrant instead. Staleness is a question of probable cause. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Protective sweep, Staleness, Waiver | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Def’s response to a SDT showed records existed for later SW; not stale

S.D.Ga.: SW for this motel room wasn’t stale after two days

While a search warrant for a motel room, a more transient place than a home, might get stale faster, this one didn’t considering the nature of the allegations. “[B]ased on the totality of the circumstances, the evidence was not stale … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception, Staleness | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: SW for this motel room wasn’t stale after two days

ND: Reasonableness under Heien supported even though erroneous conclusion traffic offense occurred

Whether failure to signal while exiting a roundabout is a traffic offense is a valid reason for a stop or not, it was reasonable for the officer to conclude it was, and that justifies the stop under Heien. City of … Continue reading →

Posted in Motion to suppress, Probable cause, Reasonableness, Staleness | Comments Off on ND: Reasonableness under Heien supported even though erroneous conclusion traffic offense occurred

GA: Mistake as to smell of MJ v. hemp was reasonable, if there was one

“At most, Gowen’s assertion about the similarity of the smells of hemp and marijuana calls into question the reasonableness of the officer’s belief that he smelled burnt marijuana. Assuming for purposes of this appeal that Gowen’s assertion is correct (even … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonableness, Staleness | Comments Off on GA: Mistake as to smell of MJ v. hemp was reasonable, if there was one

D.Conn.: Unreasonable delay in getting SW for cell phone defeats GFE

Where the officers impermissibly delayed obtaining a search warrant for defendant’s cell phone, the good faith exception does not apply. The initial seizure of the phone was valid because it was left at a crime scene. United States v. Tisdol, … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Staleness, Waiver, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Unreasonable delay in getting SW for cell phone defeats GFE

Army: Consent to search was mere acquiescence to a claim of authority

Defendant’s consent to search his apartment was obtained after telling him that it was based on the death of his roommate in the parking lot. He was in “custody,” and this was mere acquiescence to a claim of authority. “In … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Seizure, Staleness, Standing | Comments Off on Army: Consent to search was mere acquiescence to a claim of authority

N.D.Ohio: DMV’s computer mistake def’s DL was suspended doesn’t invoke the exclusionary rule under Evans

DMV’s computer mistake defendant’s DL was suspended doesn’t invoke the exclusionary rule under Evans. United States v. Salazar, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103027 (N.D. Ohio June 2, 2021). Defendant’s “regenerating” activity in selling heroin made the warrant application not stale. … Continue reading →

Posted in Custody, Exclusionary rule, Staleness, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: DMV’s computer mistake def’s DL was suspended doesn’t invoke the exclusionary rule under Evans

WA: Unverified belief in existence of arrest warrant required suppression

Unverified belief there was an arrest warrant for defendant required that the arrest and search be suppressed. State v. Pines, 2021 Wash. App. LEXIS 1223 (May 17, 2021). “Here, while the record is unclear as to when the outstanding warrant … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Attenuation, Good faith exception, Probable cause, Staleness | Comments Off on WA: Unverified belief in existence of arrest warrant required suppression

WA: Prior knowledge of arrest warrant became stale

Stale information that a warrant existed for defendant was not probable cause when the warrant had been recalled, and no one checked the day of the arrest. State v. Pines, 2021 Wash. App. LEXIS 1160 (May 10, 2021). Subpoenas to … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Collective knowledge, Franks doctrine, Staleness | Comments Off on WA: Prior knowledge of arrest warrant became stale