Category Archives: Excessive force

HI: Announcement not required for SW execution on open tent

Officers had a search warrant for a tent in a homeless encampment. Announcement before entry wasn’t required where the tent was not shut. State v. Keanaaina, 2022 Haw. LEXIS 44 (Mar. 22, 2022). Officers encountered defendant’s car double parked on … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on HI: Announcement not required for SW execution on open tent

Denver7: Federal jury awards $14 million to protesters injured in 2020 demonstrations in Denver

Denver7: Federal jury awards $14 million to protesters injured in 2020 demonstrations in Denver (“Jury finds First, Fourth amendment violations of protesters by police”)

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on Denver7: Federal jury awards $14 million to protesters injured in 2020 demonstrations in Denver

CA9: Two on QI: pepper spraying and Tasering

Officer denied qualified immunity for pepper-spraying a non-violent protester in the face. “In sum, every reasonable officer had notice at the time of the incident that, if reasonable alternatives are available, even in somewhat chaotic circumstances, he or she cannot … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: Two on QI: pepper spraying and Tasering

D.Mass.: Pretrial inmate mail was subject to search even though inmate handbook didn’t discuss it

While the pretrial inmate handbook didn’t say that outgoing mail was subject to inspection, the Supreme Court held in Stroud in 1919 that such searches were reasonable. And this one was too. United States v. Polanco, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Excessive force, Mail and packages, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Pretrial inmate mail was subject to search even though inmate handbook didn’t discuss it

FL4: Suspicionless probation search condition violates state law

The probation search condition permitting one without reasonable suspicion violates state law. Remanded to strike it from probation terms. Bowman v. State, 2022 Fla. App. LEXIS 1611 (Fla. 4th DCA Mar. 9, 2022). Window tinting stop: “Moreover, because Trooper Otterson … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Pretext, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on FL4: Suspicionless probation search condition violates state law

CA6: Personal check with residence address used in scheme was nexus to home

The 70 page search warrant affidavit in a bribery and kickback scheme showed probable cause for defendant’s residence. Records already seen showed a personal check on the home address was involved. He also was alleged to have diverted patients to … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Nexus, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA6: Personal check with residence address used in scheme was nexus to home

CA6: With multiple uses of excessive force, each must be analyzed

“Where ‘a plaintiff claims that excessive force was used multiple times, “the court must segment the incident into its constituent parts and consider the officer’s entitlement to qualified immunity at each step along the way.”’ Wright, 962 F.3d at 865 … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d) | Comments Off on CA6: With multiple uses of excessive force, each must be analyzed

CA9: The “shocking the conscience” standard is higher than the 4A standard for use of force

The “shocking the conscience” standard is way higher than the Fourth Amendment standard in excessive force cases. “The plaintiffs’ Fourteenth Amendment claim requires that the officers’ conduct ‘shocks the conscience’—a standard that is more demanding of the plaintiffs than the … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on CA9: The “shocking the conscience” standard is higher than the 4A standard for use of force

NYLJ: Analysis: How Courts Determine the Constitutionality of Police Use of Deadly Force

NYLJ: Analysis: How Courts Determine the Constitutionality of Police Use of Deadly Force (“In determining ‘objective reasonableness’ in police use of deadly force cases, Martin Schwartz looks at the Tenth Circuit’s recent decision in’ Estate of Taylor v. Salt Lake … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on NYLJ: Analysis: How Courts Determine the Constitutionality of Police Use of Deadly Force

S.D.Ill.: CPS seizing child from home can be a 4A claim

A governmental actor taking a child from the home is determined under the Fourth Amendment if substantive due process does not apply. Brokaw v. Mercer County, 235 F.3d 1000, 1017-18 (7th Cir. 2000). H.P. v. Kelley, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Issue preclusion, Seizure | Comments Off on S.D.Ill.: CPS seizing child from home can be a 4A claim

CA9: Civil 4A case requires showing of standing, too

Plaintiff’s failure to specify his standing for an alleged Fourth Amendment violation defeats his civil claim. Sanghvi v. County of San Bernardino, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 4335 (9th Cir. Feb. 17, 2022).* “Given the findings of fact at issue here, … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force | Comments Off on CA9: Civil 4A case requires showing of standing, too

FL4: Prosr’s argument def refused to give password to phone violated 4A

“The trial court erred in denying Appellant’s motion in limine and allowing the State to present evidence and argument referencing Appellant’s refusal to provide his cellphone PIN and his refusal to consent to a warrantless search of his entire cellphone. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Excessive force, Privileges, Staleness | Comments Off on FL4: Prosr’s argument def refused to give password to phone violated 4A

CA11: Not clearly established warning required before use of deadly force

It was not well established that police need to warn armed people before shooting them. Here, the shooting victim was an innocent homeowner who had a gun on him around his own house investigating a prowler, and the police saw … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Not clearly established warning required before use of deadly force

D.S.D.: RS lacking: nervousness not enough, and remainder was minimal

USMJ’s report is rejected in part. On the reasonable suspicion finding: “Here, the government relies on several factors to establish reasonable suspicion. The court has found that some of these factors, such as the visibly pulsing heartbeat and rapid breathing, … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.S.D.: RS lacking: nervousness not enough, and remainder was minimal

W.D.Okla.: Whether 14A or 4A applies to ptf’s excessive force claim on arrest before PC found by judicial officer, result the same

Plaintiff’s excessive force claim occurred after arrest but before a judicial determination of probable cause. “If so, Mr. Willis would not have been a pretrial detainee for purposes of Plaintiff’s excessive force claim. However, because the parties characterize him as … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Excessive force | Comments Off on W.D.Okla.: Whether 14A or 4A applies to ptf’s excessive force claim on arrest before PC found by judicial officer, result the same

NM: Dismissal of § 1983 excessive force case was not collateral estoppel for a state tort claims act case

Dismissal of a § 1983 excessive force case in federal court was not collateral estoppel for a state case under the state tort claims act. Hernandez v. Parker, 2022 N.M. App. LEXIS 5 (Feb. 1, 2022). Extending this stop was … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NM: Dismissal of § 1983 excessive force case was not collateral estoppel for a state tort claims act case

CA6: Where there was a threat in the house on the second floor, it wasn’t unreasonable for officers to go check it out

“We have held, however, that ‘[w]ithin a few seconds of reasonably perceiving a sufficient danger, officers may use deadly force even if in hindsight the facts show that the persons threatened could have escaped unharmed.’ … Though different decisions on … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on CA6: Where there was a threat in the house on the second floor, it wasn’t unreasonable for officers to go check it out

S.D.Ind.: The state used Google satellite images to corroborate officer’s testimony of stop

The government used Google satellite images and distancing to corroborate the officer’s testimony defendant didn’t signal his turn in time. After the stop, the smell of marijuana was apparent. United States v. Miles, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14860 (S.D.Ind. Jan. … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Excessive force | Comments Off on S.D.Ind.: The state used Google satellite images to corroborate officer’s testimony of stop

NJ: Race and being ¾ mile from a robbery not RS

Defendants were stopped in a car ¾ of a mile and driving away from the scene of a 7-11 robbery. All the officer knew was there were two black males involved. In their car, there were three black males. That … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NJ: Race and being ¾ mile from a robbery not RS

OH12: Trial court’s finding of no RS and no consent affirmed

The state failed to prove that the stop was with reasonable suspicion. “While Officer Ianson’s questioning was not expressly coercive, the circumstances surrounding the request to search made the questioning impliedly coercive. Thus, the circumstances suggest that Massey merely submitted … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review | Comments Off on OH12: Trial court’s finding of no RS and no consent affirmed