Category Archives: Excessive force

MT: Search of electronics under SW needs to start by SW expiration, not be completed

The search warrant for numerous electronic devices (phones and tablets) was served within ten days but the search couldn’t be completed for longer than that. The grant of the motion to suppress because of the delay is reversed. The warrant … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on MT: Search of electronics under SW needs to start by SW expiration, not be completed

CA8: Takedown was lawful, assault thereafter wasn’t

Plaintiff’s takedown was lawful, but not the assault after he was down. “It is even more clearly established now. A suspect’s ‘right[] to be free from excessive force [is] violated if officers choke, kick, or punch [him] when [he is] … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA8: Takedown was lawful, assault thereafter wasn’t

E.D.Mo.: Squatter owner had knowledge of still had no standing

Defendant was essentially a squatter who was wrongfully on the premises and had no standing. The owner lived on the second floor, and he squatted on the first floor for months. The building was condemned. His claim the owner’s tolerating … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Excessive force, Good faith exception, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Squatter owner had knowledge of still had no standing

NY3: No REP in SHU surveillance

Defendant was in a special housing unit in a NY state prison. He knew he was under constant surveillance. He had no reasonable expectation of privacy in admissions he made caught on video. People v. Ashcroft, 2024 NY Slip Op … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Prison and jail searches, Surveillance technology, Warrant papers | Comments Off on NY3: No REP in SHU surveillance

MO: Def’s 4A ineffective assistance claim fails because he doesn’t show he’d prevail on the 4A claim

Defendant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim was based on defense counsel’s failure to file a motion to suppress of a marital vehicle. He never, however, showed that he did, in fact, have standing. Moreover, the trial court found that the … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on MO: Def’s 4A ineffective assistance claim fails because he doesn’t show he’d prevail on the 4A claim

CA11: Body slam of slighter built resisting arrestee was reasonable force

The officer’s body slam of a resisting minor suspect about half his weight was entitled to qualified immunity. “But even if the facts of our case did fit Richmond, the statement that ‘less force is appropriate’ would not put every … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Excessive force, Particularity | Comments Off on CA11: Body slam of slighter built resisting arrestee was reasonable force

Force Science: Officer-created jeopardy: A legal theory that threatens effective policing

Force Science via Police 1: Officer-created jeopardy: A legal theory that threatens effective policing by Lewis “Von” Kliem (“The Supreme Court recently agreed to hear Barnes v. Felix, a case that could redefine how officers’ split-second decisions are judged” [¶] … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on Force Science: Officer-created jeopardy: A legal theory that threatens effective policing

E.D.Va.: The affiant’s passing on alleged exaggerations from other officers wasn’t material to PC

Relying on reports of other officers that could have been exaggerations in part didn’t show that the affiant was intentionally or recklessly misleading the court. Also, “the Defendant has failed to demonstrate that Officer Granville’s inclusion of the exaggerated statement … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: The affiant’s passing on alleged exaggerations from other officers wasn’t material to PC

AZ: A traffic offense could be used to stop defendant to question him about a fatal accident 11 days earlier

Defendant committed a traffic offense and was stopped. Officers had reasonable suspicion he left the scene of a fatal accident 11 days earlier, and officers wanted to talk to him about that. The stop was not pretextual because there was … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Excessive force | Comments Off on AZ: A traffic offense could be used to stop defendant to question him about a fatal accident 11 days earlier

D.Utah: Positive CODIS hit justifies SW for DNA for confirmation

“Contrary to Defendant’s view, the positive CODIS hit did not ‘only amount[] to an investigative lead at best ….’ It is well-established that a blood match from a reputable, national database that links a defendant to a crime scene establishes … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Excessive force, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Utah: Positive CODIS hit justifies SW for DNA for confirmation

Reason: Cop who fired blindly into Breonna Taylor’s home is convicted of violating her constitutional rights

Reason: Cop who fired blindly into Breonna Taylor’s home is convicted of violating her constitutional rights by Jacob Sullum (“Former Louisville detective Brett Hankison was convicted of violating Taylor’s Fourth Amendment rights during the deadly 2020 raid.”):

Posted in Excessive force, Warrant execution | Comments Off on Reason: Cop who fired blindly into Breonna Taylor’s home is convicted of violating her constitutional rights

CA5: Police shooting from behind after escalating violent situation was not unreasonable

The police shooting here from behind was not unreasonable on the totality. “When McVae threw the rock, Trooper Perez had to make an immediate reflexive decision of how to protect himself in a rapidly evolving situation against an increasingly violent … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Excessive force, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA5: Police shooting from behind after escalating violent situation was not unreasonable

CA2: 4A doesn’t incorporate state procedural rules and statutes

The constitution doesn’t incorporate state criminal procedural rules and statutes, and a violation of them doesn’t make a Fourth Amendment violation. See Virginia v. Moore. McCullough v. Graves, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 27503 (2d Cir. Oct. 30, 2024). The address … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA2: 4A doesn’t incorporate state procedural rules and statutes

OH7: Postal worker’s information about defendant’s cash and mail was PC for warrant

A postal worker’s information that defendant had lots of cash and was receiving packages that smelled like marijuana was probable cause for his house. State v. Middleton, 2024-Ohio-5172, 2024 Ohio App. LEXIS 3877 (7th Dist. Oct. 28, 2024).* The use … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Prison and jail searches, Probable cause, Strip search | Comments Off on OH7: Postal worker’s information about defendant’s cash and mail was PC for warrant

CA6: Realtime ping information didn’t require a warrant

“Perry first challenges the validity of the search warrants for call and location data from his two cellphones. Law-enforcement officers generally need a warrant to conduct a ‘search’ that intrudes upon a person’s reasonable expectation of privacy. … But a … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Excessive force, GPS / Tracking Data, Seizure | Comments Off on CA6: Realtime ping information didn’t require a warrant

D.Mass.: Four-month delay in searching lawfully seized cell phone here not unreasonable

Four month delay in searching cell phones after lawfully seizing them was not unreasonable. “Defendant relies primarily on United States v. Smith, a Second Circuit case. … There, in assessing whether a thirty-one day delay between police seizing a tablet … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Excessive force, Probable cause, Standing, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Four-month delay in searching lawfully seized cell phone here not unreasonable

DE: Nexus for SW for car did not extend to def’s house

The nexus in the affidavit for the warrant for defendant’s car did not extend to his house, so there was no probable cause for the house search. (The search is valid, however, from inevitable discovery. “That said, because the State … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Nexus, Waiver | Comments Off on DE: Nexus for SW for car did not extend to def’s house

W.D.Ark.: State remedy for return of property bars § 1983 claim for it

Plaintiff’s § 1983 suit for return of property is denied because there is a state law remedy, even if a federal claim was barred by Heck. Owens v. Samuel, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 189894 (W.D. Ark. Sep. 24, 2024), adopted, … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on W.D.Ark.: State remedy for return of property bars § 1983 claim for it

M.D.Fla.: T.L.O. informs the use of handcuffs in school v. excessive force

T.L.O. informs the use of handcuffs in school v. excessive force. Here, the student was objectively enough of a safety risk to justify handcuffs. “Further, because the Fourth Amendment reasonableness inquiry is an objective standard, more discovery to determine Defendants’ … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion, School searches | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: T.L.O. informs the use of handcuffs in school v. excessive force

CA3: Collective knowledge applies to reasons to extend a stop

With collective knowledge there was reason to extend the stop. United States v. McAliley, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 25982 (3d Cir. Oct. 15, 2024).* (After all, collective knowledge applies to reasonable suspicion too.) The USMJ’s decision denying the motion to … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Excessive force, Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA3: Collective knowledge applies to reasons to extend a stop