Category Archives: Excessive force

E.D.Ark.: Def’s statements disassociating himself from the premises searched showed no standing

Defendant had some connection to the premises, but his disassociation from the premises when asked about it by the police showed his lack of standing. “To resolve his motion to suppress, however, the Court need not determine whether these possessory … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Inevitable discovery, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Ark.: Def’s statements disassociating himself from the premises searched showed no standing

CA5: Def’s actions showed he consented to entry into house

The evidence supports the district court’s conclusion defendant consented to the second entry of his home. His actions and turning to lead officers into his house showed consent. United States v. Lozano, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 16894 (5th Cir. June … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Excessive force | Comments Off on CA5: Def’s actions showed he consented to entry into house

NY Richmond Co.: PC without including protective sweep

“These facts alone, without taking the protective sweep into consideration, would have provided a magistrate with probable cause to issue a search warrant. A sworn statement of an identified member of the community attesting to facts directly and personally observed … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Probable cause, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY Richmond Co.: PC without including protective sweep

E.D.Tenn.: Finding ammo not matching seized firearm justifies further search

Officers finding ammunition from a different caliber gun than the one found justifies a further search. United States v. Berry, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98684 (E.D.Tenn. May 3, 2022), adopted, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98639 (E.D.Tenn. June 2, 2022). Plaintiff’s … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Search incident, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Finding ammo not matching seized firearm justifies further search

D.Ore.: Officer may be cross-examined at trial over contents of SW affidavit if relevant

“The Court denies the Government’s motion to prohibit Defendant from cross-examining IRS Special Agent Jason Nix on his sworn statements contained in a search warrant application. See ECF 100 at 13-15. Defendant may cross examine Special Agent Nix regarding any … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on D.Ore.: Officer may be cross-examined at trial over contents of SW affidavit if relevant

CA9: Mandated GPS tracking of e-scooters not 4A violation

The City of Los Angeles e-scooter ordinance requires the scooters to have GPS and provide real time tracking information. This is classic third-party data, and there is no reasonable expectation of privacy of scooter users in that information. Sanchez v. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Excessive force, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on CA9: Mandated GPS tracking of e-scooters not 4A violation

WaPo: Florida sheriff’s deputy uses Taser at gas station, setting man on fire

WaPo: Florida sheriff’s deputy uses Taser at gas station, setting man on fire by Lindsey Bever (“A Florida sheriff’s deputy is facing a criminal charge after using a Taser near gasoline, igniting a fire that severely burned a 26-year-old suspect … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force | Comments Off on WaPo: Florida sheriff’s deputy uses Taser at gas station, setting man on fire

NJ: Visitor had standing in his own stuff, even if not the place

A visitor had standing to contest the search of his own stuff while he was there. (And the alleged consent of his mother was suspect.) State v. Marcellus, 2022 N.J. Super. LEXIS 67 (May 18, 2022). Defendant was stopped for … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Excessive force, Reasonableness, Standing | Comments Off on NJ: Visitor had standing in his own stuff, even if not the place

CA10: Pepper spraying a subdued misdemeanant was unreasonable; no QI

“Addressing the two prongs of qualified immunity below, we conclude that the use of pepper spray violated Mr. Wilkins’s clearly established right to be free from the additional use of force after he was effectively subdued. The officers were not … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Excessive force, Good faith exception, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA10: Pepper spraying a subdued misdemeanant was unreasonable; no QI

S.D.Miss.: 4A isn’t a basis to challenge federal marijuana criminalization

The Fourth Amendment provides no basis to claim that federal prosecution of marijuana cases violates the Constitution. United States v. Jones, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73000 (S.D.Miss. Apr. 21, 2022).* The officer here had probable cause to arrest plaintiff for … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Excessive force, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.Miss.: 4A isn’t a basis to challenge federal marijuana criminalization

D.Me.: Settled law at the time means exclusionary rule not applied, even if the law was later changing

Officers relied on settled law in this circuit that the search incident was valid. Maybe it wouldn’t be later, but it was at the time. The exclusionary rule should not be applied under Davis. “Given the similarity of these two … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception, Standards of review | Comments Off on D.Me.: Settled law at the time means exclusionary rule not applied, even if the law was later changing

E.D.Ark.: City’s court order made clean up and removal of ptf’s property reasonable

Plaintiff was told for years to clean up his property from unsightly construction materials and equipment. After many failed efforts to get him to do so, the city obtained a court order to remove the property. It removed nine trailerloads … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Excessive force, Ineffective assistance, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.Ark.: City’s court order made clean up and removal of ptf’s property reasonable

CA6: All family members have common authority over common areas of the house

All family members have common authority over common areas of the house. United States v. Campany, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 9518 (6th Cir. Apr. 8, 2022). Defendant’s Franks claim for ineffective assistance of counsel fails for failing to show what … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Excessive force, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA6: All family members have common authority over common areas of the house

CA9: PC of digital theft from Microsoft by employee also led to his home computer

There was probable cause to believe that defendant’s home computer would have evidence of his $10m digital theft from Microsoft from when he worked there. United States v. Kvashuk, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 8275 (9th Cir. Mar. 28, 2022).* There … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Informant hearsay, Nexus | Comments Off on CA9: PC of digital theft from Microsoft by employee also led to his home computer

CA3: “[R]easonableness [of force] under the Fourth Amendment should frequently remain a question for the jury”

“Given the totality of the circumstances, the District Court erred in concluding as a matter of law that the use of force was objectively reasonable. See Giles v. Kearney, 571 F.3d 318, 327 n.4 (3d Cir. 2009) (denying summary judgment … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA3: “[R]easonableness [of force] under the Fourth Amendment should frequently remain a question for the jury”

PA: No apparent authority that def’s mother, a visitor outside, could consent to search

There was no apparent authority for defendant’s mother to consent to police entry. They knew she was a mere visitor herself, and she offered to let them in. She was not inside; she just came up when they were there. … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Excessive force | Comments Off on PA: No apparent authority that def’s mother, a visitor outside, could consent to search

A few § 1983 cases on QI and summary judgment

Ordering plaintiff out of the Sheriff’s Office lobby for fear of disruption was novel as a potential seizure and that’s subject to qualified immunity. “Sheriff Crone’s conduct in ordering Mr. Brandt to leave the lobby due to a perceived disruption … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on A few § 1983 cases on QI and summary judgment

HI: Announcement not required for SW execution on open tent

Officers had a search warrant for a tent in a homeless encampment. Announcement before entry wasn’t required where the tent was not shut. State v. Keanaaina, 2022 Haw. LEXIS 44 (Mar. 22, 2022). Officers encountered defendant’s car double parked on … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on HI: Announcement not required for SW execution on open tent

Denver7: Federal jury awards $14 million to protesters injured in 2020 demonstrations in Denver

Denver7: Federal jury awards $14 million to protesters injured in 2020 demonstrations in Denver (“Jury finds First, Fourth amendment violations of protesters by police”)

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on Denver7: Federal jury awards $14 million to protesters injured in 2020 demonstrations in Denver

CA9: Two on QI: pepper spraying and Tasering

Officer denied qualified immunity for pepper-spraying a non-violent protester in the face. “In sum, every reasonable officer had notice at the time of the incident that, if reasonable alternatives are available, even in somewhat chaotic circumstances, he or she cannot … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: Two on QI: pepper spraying and Tasering