Category Archives: Qualified immunity

OH7: Officer seeing sawed-off shotgun in car door justified questions under Quarles

Defendant was stopped and got out of his car, and in the door was a sawed off shotgun. Questions about the gun next to him were legitimate under Quarles. State v. Anderson, 2023-Ohio-945, 2023 Ohio App. LEXIS 922 (7th Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on OH7: Officer seeing sawed-off shotgun in car door justified questions under Quarles

D.N.M.: Three days of warrantless real time CSLI was reasonable because of exigency

Three days of real time CSLI was obtained by the police because of a missing child, and it was reasonable as exigency. United States v. Torres, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44017 (D.N.M. Mar. 15, 2023).* No qualified immunity for Tasing … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Emergency / exigency, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Three days of warrantless real time CSLI was reasonable because of exigency

WA: Stop to inquire of paying transit fare violated state constitution

Defendant’s freedom under the state constitution to not be interfered with in his private affairs was violated by a stop and inquiry whether he had paid a transit fare. He provided a false name that led to his prosecution for … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Qualified immunity, Seizure, State constitution | Comments Off on WA: Stop to inquire of paying transit fare violated state constitution

CA5: Videos alone show no QI

Based on the videos alone, there was excessive force and qualified immunity is denied. Ducksworth v. Landrum, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 5807 (5th Cir. Mar. 10, 2023):

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: Videos alone show no QI

CA8: GFE applies to dog sniff at apt door before law changed

Defendant’s apartment door was subjected to a dog sniff at his apartment door before the court limited it in United States v. Perez, 46 F.4th 691 (8th Cir. 2022). The good faith exception applies. United States v. Hines, 2023 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Good faith exception, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA8: GFE applies to dog sniff at apt door before law changed

S.D.Ind.: 911 response to stabbing call had report of others inside; that was exigency

The officer arrived at plaintiff’s house because of a 911 call about a stabbing. A man who had been stabbed was outside and he said it happened inside and there were others. That justified the officer’s entry into the house. … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Prison and jail searches, Qualified immunity, Strip search | Comments Off on S.D.Ind.: 911 response to stabbing call had report of others inside; that was exigency

CA9: “Clearly established law” in one sentence

“Cardenas has not identified any case holding that police officers violated the Fourth Amendment by making an arrest under similar circumstances, and we are not aware of any such case.” Cardenas v. Saladen, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 5091 (9th Cir. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: “Clearly established law” in one sentence

N.D.Cal.: Key fob on parolee’s person means car under his control even if elsewhere

Defendant parolee was a passenger in a car and he had his car key fob on him. The car, albeit not there, was still “under his control” for a parole search, relying on United States v. Cervantes, 859 F.3d 1175 … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Key fob on parolee’s person means car under his control even if elsewhere

CA11: Inventory applied even if automobile exception not satisfied

The search of defendant’s car would have happened as a result of an inventory search whether or not the automobile exception applied. Therefore, inevitable discovery was satisfied. United States v. Russell, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 3820 (11th Cir. Feb. 17, … Continue reading

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Qualified immunity, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA11: Inventory applied even if automobile exception not satisfied

W.D.N.Y.: 108-day delay in SW for cell phone was unreasonable

An unreasonable 108-day delay in retrieving defendant’s cell phone from local police after the DEA adopted the case required suppression of the search of the phone. United States v. Adams, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23973 (W.D.N.Y. Feb. 13, 2023). Officers … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: 108-day delay in SW for cell phone was unreasonable

CA6: Being a drug dealer is not per se nexus to one’s home; more required

Defendant was a drug dealer, but the affidavit for warrant did nothing to show a reason to believe (nexus) that drugs would be found at his house. No case in this circuit supports nexus on these facts. Moreover, the information … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Arrest or entry on arrest, Dog sniff, Nexus, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: Being a drug dealer is not per se nexus to one’s home; more required

GA: BOLO for aggressive driver in gray car didn’t support stop

There was no reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop for being an “aggressive driver in a gray car.” The trial court properly suppressed. State v. Glanton, 2023 Ga. App. LEXIS 55 (Feb. 3, 2023). (“In considering these factors we find (1) … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on GA: BOLO for aggressive driver in gray car didn’t support stop

CA10: Excessive force claim not obvious, so QI applies

Plaintiff resisted getting out of her car after a traffic stop and repeated requests then orders to do so. She was taken down and claims injuries. This is not an obvious constitutional violation under Graham, so the officer gets qualified … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA10: Excessive force claim not obvious, so QI applies

W.D.N.C.: Def must state phone is his to have standing to contest SW

Without acknowledging the cell phone police searched was his, defendant did not show standing to contest the search. Even so, the use of forensic software to bypass the password protection on the phone didn’t make the search unreasonable. United States … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Qualified immunity, Scope of search | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: Def must state phone is his to have standing to contest SW

CA10: Traffic stop to flirt with motorist was unreasonable, and clearly established that cause needed

The officer’s stop of plaintiff to flirt with her was without basis and thus unreasonable, and clearly established. Shepherd v. Robbins, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 36056 (10th Cir. Dec. 13, 2022) [corrected Dec. 28, 2022]. Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA10: Traffic stop to flirt with motorist was unreasonable, and clearly established that cause needed

D.Minn.: All theories to suppress must be raised to USMJ on referral or it’s waived

Defendant’s storage unit had the doors and handles tested with Ion Scanning. He had no reasonable expectation of privacy in that. Before the USDJ, however, he raised it was a trespass to do it as the officers did. That’s waived … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Community caretaking function, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on D.Minn.: All theories to suppress must be raised to USMJ on referral or it’s waived

CA6: 4A generally doesn’t apply to sentencing enhancements

“The Fourth Amendment does not apply to sentencing enhancements. … We have recognized a possible exception to this rule—when officers illegally seized the evidence for the very purpose of enhancing the defendant’s sentence—but Wyse makes no such allegation.” United States … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Informant hearsay, Qualified immunity, Staleness | Comments Off on CA6: 4A generally doesn’t apply to sentencing enhancements

D.Nev.: Flight not RS, but in a high crime area it more likely is

Flight alone is not reasonable suspicion. Flight in a high crime area is more likely to be. United States v. Holmes, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 225855 (D. Nev. Dec. 14, 2022). “Determining the appellant’s identity was necessary to permit the … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Flight not RS, but in a high crime area it more likely is

CA10: Traffic stop to flirt with a motorist violates clearly established law

A traffic stop to flirt with a motorist violates clearly established law. But this is a more complicated. “Ultimately, Plaintiff’s appeal rises and falls on the question of whether Defendant’s conduct violated clearly established law. To the degree that Defendant acted … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA10: Traffic stop to flirt with a motorist violates clearly established law

WI: A description of a Harley in Wisconsin in April is generic and not RS

The description of the offending vehicle as a Harley in Wisconsin is so generic it can’t support a stop. “After all, Wisconsin is the home of Harley-Davidson, and it is one of, if not the most popular manufacturers of motorcycles … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on WI: A description of a Harley in Wisconsin in April is generic and not RS