Category Archives: Automobile exception

CA7: Consent to search a laptop in a child pornography case included a full forensic review

On plain error review, consent to search a laptop in a child pornography case included a full forensic review. United States v. Price\, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 22996 (7th Cir. December 5, 2014). There was no evidence defense counsel didn’t … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, Ineffective assistance, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA7: Consent to search a laptop in a child pornography case included a full forensic review

CA11: SW was not bare bones and a reasonable officer could rely on it; therefore, qualified immunity

A search warrant issued for plaintiffs’ place based on a “13 year” drug investigation that led to trace evidence of drug usage in the basement. The charges filed were ultimately dismissed. The officers were qualifiedly immune because of the issuance … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Automobile exception, Drug or alcohol testing, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: SW was not bare bones and a reasonable officer could rely on it; therefore, qualified immunity

IL: Implied consent law not per se unconstitutional under McNeely

Illinois’ implied consent statute is not unconstitutional per se under McNeely. Every case has to be judged on its own facts. This involved a serious accident with injuries requiring hospitalization and defendant consented to the blood draw. People v. Hasselbring, … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IL: Implied consent law not per se unconstitutional under McNeely

MO: Entry to talk to defendant about stolen car was without exigency and suppressed

Officers got word that a man was trying to sell a stolen car, and they gave defendant’s address. One drove by defendant’s house five times before finding the car there, so he called for back up, doing a knock-and-talk over … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Automobile exception, Emergency / exigency, Knock and talk | Comments Off on MO: Entry to talk to defendant about stolen car was without exigency and suppressed

IL: Search under the automobile exception can occur after the car is moved to police station

The police had detailed probable cause from a CI there would be heroin in a hidden compartment in defendant’s car. The automobile exception permits the car to be moved to the police station for a search for the hidden compartment. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent | Comments Off on IL: Search under the automobile exception can occur after the car is moved to police station

E.D.Mich.: Generally, absent owner of a car loaned to somebody else doesn’t have standing to challenge the stop and then search of the car

Generally, the absent owner of a car loaned to somebody else doesn’t have standing to challenge the stop and then search of the car. United States v. Gonzalez, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 162121 (E.D. Mich. November 19, 2014). Because of … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Plain view, feel, smell, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Generally, absent owner of a car loaned to somebody else doesn’t have standing to challenge the stop and then search of the car

CA11: Warrantless search of cell phone cured by later warrant on independent PC

The warrantless search of defendant’s cell phone had plenty of independent probable cause for later issuance of state and federal search warrants for it. “Additionally, the evidence relayed above was not obtained via any police misconduct but, rather, was obtained … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Independent source, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on CA11: Warrantless search of cell phone cured by later warrant on independent PC

TX13: Neither automobile exception nor search incident permit warrantless blood draw for DUI

Exigent circumstances didn’t justify the warrantless blood draw. Neither the automobile exception nor the search incident doctrine can be used to search a person’s blood. Smith v. State, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 12372 (Tex. App.– Corpus Christi-Edinburg November 13, 2014):

Posted in Automobile exception, Drug or alcohol testing, Search incident | Comments Off on TX13: Neither automobile exception nor search incident permit warrantless blood draw for DUI

OH3: Slightly pulling out bra by bottom elastic exposed nothing and wasn’t a strip search

Pulling defendant’s bra out slightly by the bottom elastic not exposing her breasts was not a strip search in violation of state statute or the Fourth Amendment. State v. Murphy, 2014-Ohio-5002, 2014 Ohio App. LEXIS 4861 (3d Dist. November 10, … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Seizure, Strip search | Comments Off on OH3: Slightly pulling out bra by bottom elastic exposed nothing and wasn’t a strip search

AR: Def’s rear door shown as door where knock always answered, so curtilage not violated

Defendant’s house had a circle drive and a front door and a back door. The back door was found a normal place of entry. At the suppression hearing, the officer testified that he’d been there before on official business and … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, Curtilage, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on AR: Def’s rear door shown as door where knock always answered, so curtilage not violated

W.D.N.Y.: Cell phone found in automobile exception search could be seized for SW

Defendant’s cell phone found in a car searched under the automobile exception could be seized pending getting a search warrant for it. There was probable cause to believe evidence of the crime would be found there. United States v. Palermo, … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Cell phones, Nexus | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Cell phone found in automobile exception search could be seized for SW

E.D.Ky.: With smell of MJ in car and it couldn’t be found, officer could look under hood and into air cleaner

In a traffic stop, the officer could smell marijuana and that gave probable cause to search. He couldn’t find it in the passenger compartment, so he could look in the engine compartment. United States v. Hollis, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Reasonable suspicion, Roadblocks | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: With smell of MJ in car and it couldn’t be found, officer could look under hood and into air cleaner

AR: Locked safe in car could be searched without warrant under automobile exception

Where the automobile exception applies to a car, the state does not need a search warrant to search a locked safe found in it. State v. Crane, 2014 Ark. 443, 2014 Ark. LEXIS 586 (October 30, 2014). The government did … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Informant hearsay, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on AR: Locked safe in car could be searched without warrant under automobile exception

TX10: Consent to cell phone password was limited to seeing who was calling, and it was not a general consent to search

Defendant was stopped for erratic driving. While in the patrol car, defendant’s cell phone rang, and the officer asked for the password to see who was calling. Defendant gave it. That was not a consent to search the whole phone. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Cell phones, Consent | Comments Off on TX10: Consent to cell phone password was limited to seeing who was calling, and it was not a general consent to search

CA9: Def chose not to deal with police, so he didn’t reject consent for Randolph purposes

Randolph requires an express refusal of consent. Defendant here refused to come to the door when the police arrived, and he let his girlfriend talk to them, and she consented to a search. He didn’t have to be asked. United … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Automobile exception, Consent, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on CA9: Def chose not to deal with police, so he didn’t reject consent for Randolph purposes

CA7: Search of car was valid both under SI and automobile exception

Defendant had an argument with his girlfriend and took her unlicensed car and drove off. She called the police. The responding officer knew the couple and saw the car immediately. The stop for driving a potentially stolen car was valid … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA7: Search of car was valid both under SI and automobile exception

CA4: Officers didn’t force their way in, but the exceptions to knock-and-announce applied

The officer hit defendant’s door hard to announce his presence under the knock-and-announce requirement and the door swung open on its own. That was technically a “breaking” under § 3109, but it was reasonable to enter without announcement because of … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Arrest or entry on arrest, Automobile exception, Consent, Knock and announce, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA4: Officers didn’t force their way in, but the exceptions to knock-and-announce applied

M.D.Tenn.: Def agreed to suspicionless probation searches

Defendant agreed to suspicionless probation searches, and this one is sustained under Samson. United States v. Tessier, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 137301 (M.D. Tenn. September 29, 2014).* A dog alert on a motorhome for drugs justified a search of it. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on M.D.Tenn.: Def agreed to suspicionless probation searches

N.D.Ill.: Apartment was searched with a warrant; def’s car down street was searched under automobile exception

Officers had probable cause to search defendant’s car for drugs under the automobile exception. They had a search warrant for his apartment but it didn’t include the car which was parked down the street. They had, however, plenty of information … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Curtilage, Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Apartment was searched with a warrant; def’s car down street was searched under automobile exception

CA6: Exigency supported seizure of animals from pet store, but not its records

Animal control officers seized animals and records from a pet store in Chattanooga for lack of water, food, and proper care. The animal seizure was valid and did not violate any clearly established right. The business record seizure, however, could … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Emergency / exigency, Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Scope of search | Comments Off on CA6: Exigency supported seizure of animals from pet store, but not its records