W.D.N.Y.: Cell phone found in automobile exception search could be seized for SW

Defendant’s cell phone found in a car searched under the automobile exception could be seized pending getting a search warrant for it. There was probable cause to believe evidence of the crime would be found there. United States v. Palermo, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 157619 (W.D. N.Y. November 6, 2014).*

The affidavit for the search warrant for child pornography by having taken nude pictures of a juvenile showed probable cause based on her statement to the police. Staleness wasn’t a viable issue either. United States v. Johnson, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 156491 (D. Minn. September 18, 2014),* adopted 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 156734 (D. Minn. November 4, 2014).*

Defendant argued that evidence of prostitution would not be found in her home so nexus was lacking. The court disagrees because the charge is sex trafficking, and one of the girls involved lived in her home. Also, the warrant was not stale. United States v. Willis, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 157021 (W.D. N.Y. November 5, 2014).*

This entry was posted in Automobile exception, Cell phones, Nexus. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.