N.D.Ill.: Apartment was searched with a warrant; def’s car down street was searched under automobile exception

Officers had probable cause to search defendant’s car for drugs under the automobile exception. They had a search warrant for his apartment but it didn’t include the car which was parked down the street. They had, however, plenty of information about him dealing drugs from the car, and then a dog alerted on the car parked on the street. United States v. Smith, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 136697 (N.D. Ill. September 26, 2014).*

Police received a domestic disturbance call from 11th Ave. and 10th St. and responded. At one house the officer approached, and the occupant, looking at him, hastily shut the door. The officer went to the door and knocked and got no answer. Going around to the side was by exigent circumstances. “By this point, the officers knew that at least one occupant was present in the home and that the address was associated with the telephone number of a caller who had just reported being assaulted in that geographic location. Again, it would have been unthinkable for the officers to simply return to their vehicles and drive away. One can only imagine the justifiable criticism they would have faced had it turned out that Chiesa was being harmed and/or held against her will inside the home.” Search of a duffle bag without a warrant was suppressed, however. United States v. Mosley, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 136911 (N.D. Iowa September 26, 2014),* adopted 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 151619 (N.D. Iowa October 27, 2014).*

The USMJ’s factual finding that the registration sticker was unreadable is binding, and that was a proper basis for the stop. United States v. Cade-Gilson, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 136824 (N.D. Iowa September 29, 2014).*

This entry was posted in Automobile exception, Curtilage, Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.