IL: Implied consent law not per se unconstitutional under McNeely

Illinois’ implied consent statute is not unconstitutional per se under McNeely. Every case has to be judged on its own facts. This involved a serious accident with injuries requiring hospitalization and defendant consented to the blood draw. People v. Hasselbring, 2014 IL App (4th) 131128, 2014 Ill. App. LEXIS 811 (November 24, 2014).

The government’s CI information was that defendant was traveling in a car with two other cars involving four people on the way to a drug robbery, and it all added up to probable cause for a search under the automobile exception. United States v. Speller, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 164144 (S.D. N.Y. November 24, 2014).*

After defendant’s traffic stop, his excessive nervousness to the point of sweating and hands shaking along with contradictory stories and passengers feigning sleep was reasonable suspicion. United States v. Williamson, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 163803 (E.D. Mich. November 24, 2014).*

This entry was posted in Automobile exception, Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.