Category Archives: Standing

D.Haw.: Using three people to mask defendant’s alleged ownership of a package was a lack of standing in the package

“Here, Defendant Notyce was neither the sender nor the addressee of the package. The parcel was not addressed to him or a physical location associated with him. Defendant Notyce did not retrieve the parcel from the post office box or … Continue reading →

Posted in Mail and packages, Standing | Comments Off on D.Haw.: Using three people to mask defendant’s alleged ownership of a package was a lack of standing in the package

N.D.Cal.: Suspicionless probation search condition not shown to be on defendant; motion to suppress granted

Defendant did not have a suspicionless search condition on him. “This Court now joins the other courts in this district that have held that an officer must have reasonable suspicion to conduct a search of a probationer, unless the probationer … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Suspicionless probation search condition not shown to be on defendant; motion to suppress granted

D.Nev.: Def had standing in a car he was loaned

Defendant had standing to challenge GPS tracking of a car he was loaned by the owner. The search wasn’t a pretext from inventory: there was probable cause for the automobile exception. “A warrantless search can occur even after the automobile … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Def had standing in a car he was loaned

DE: Probation absconder didn’t have standing in another person’s property; alternatively, probation absconding is exigency

Defendant was a probation absconder, and he did not have standing to contest a search of another probationer’s camper. Even if defendant did have standing, the probation officers substantially complied with departmental guidelines. Defendant’s presence as an absconder from probation … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Probation / Parole search, Standing | Comments Off on DE: Probation absconder didn’t have standing in another person’s property; alternatively, probation absconding is exigency

S.D.Fla.: Def’s having keys and free access to girlfriend’s apt gives him standing, but the protective sweep was clearly justified

Defendant has standing to challenge the search of his girlfriend’s apartment because he has keys and stays there when he wants to without limitation. “Therefore, the Defendant argues that the Defendant has at least as much of a privacy interest … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: Def’s having keys and free access to girlfriend’s apt gives him standing, but the protective sweep was clearly justified

CA11: Parolee has no REP where he stays

Officers had cause for a protective sweep as well as consent from defendant’s girlfriend to search her apartment where he often stayed. A shotgun was in plain view. Defendant also had no standing because he was a parolee. United States … Continue reading →

Posted in Knock and talk, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on CA11: Parolee has no REP where he stays

OH12: SW for text messages on a cell phone was not overbroad where it was limited to messages from one person

Defendant was a police officer who was suspected of sexual battery of a student ride along. There were text messages, and a search warrant was obtained for his cell phone. The lack of a time frame for the text messages … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Cell phones, Overbreadth, Standing | Comments Off on OH12: SW for text messages on a cell phone was not overbroad where it was limited to messages from one person

TX14: Def had no standing in cell phone he gave to his girlfriend

Defendant had no standing in a cell phone that he gave to his girlfriend and referred to as her cell phone. It was stolen from her and searched to locate the possible owner, and the phone had video of defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Standing | Comments Off on TX14: Def had no standing in cell phone he gave to his girlfriend

D.Minn.: No standing where car rental company did not authorize def to drive

“Defendant’s argument as to standing to challenge the search of the van is foreclosed by the recent decision of the Eighth Circuit in United States v. Long, ___ F.3d ___, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 16740, 2017 WL 3741873 at *3 … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on D.Minn.: No standing where car rental company did not authorize def to drive

SD: Being a close friend and regular social guest of the homeowner still doesn’t give standing

Being a close friend and regular social guest of the homeowner still doesn’t give standing; it just isn’t a strong enough connection to the premises. He cared for the homeowner’s cat on occasion, but that wasn’t explained. State v. Gaters, … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on SD: Being a close friend and regular social guest of the homeowner still doesn’t give standing

CA3: Def lacked standing to challenge search of co-def cell phone

Defendant lacked standing to challenge the search of a cell phone taken off a co-defendant that didn’t belong him. Besides, the search of that cell phone was valid. United States v. Brewer, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 18003 (3d Cir. Sept. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Standing | Comments Off on CA3: Def lacked standing to challenge search of co-def cell phone

CA9: Guest of evicted tenant has no REP in premises

Plaintiff claimed to be the guest of the alleged tenant who had been evicted from the premises and he knew it. Thus, they were trespassers, and there was no reasonable expectation of privacy to complain of the officers’ entry. Plaintiff … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on CA9: Guest of evicted tenant has no REP in premises

M.D.La.: Def claims an illegal search led to his arrest; his admissions on jail phone calls are attenuated from that

Defendant’s calls from jail to his girlfriend about destroying evidence were attenuated from any prior illegality. “The Court finds that the nexus between the original unlawful search and the challenged evidence was attenuated by the intervening phone calls, an independent … Continue reading →

Posted in Attenuation, Standing | Comments Off on M.D.La.: Def claims an illegal search led to his arrest; his admissions on jail phone calls are attenuated from that

OH: Def has no standing in place of another that he was arrested in, so Steagald provides him no relief

Defendant could not show he had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the premises of a third person, although he was the person being looked for. The court discusses Steagald and the Ninth Circuit’s en banc Underwood (1983, Treatise §§ … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of pleading, Standing | Comments Off on OH: Def has no standing in place of another that he was arrested in, so Steagald provides him no relief

E.D.Mo.: Def stayed often enough with his mother that he had standing in her place

Defendant was given standing in his mother’s home, even though he did not live there full time. His uncle also lived there, and he had apparent authority and “free agency” to consent to a search of the premises. United States … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Def stayed often enough with his mother that he had standing in her place

N.D.W.Va.: GFE generally doesn’t apply to warrantless searches

Defendant’s wife did not voluntarily consent to the police entry into the basement of her bar. First, they detained defendant behind the bar. Then police came to the bar in great numbers (6-15, depending on the witness) while the bar … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.W.Va.: GFE generally doesn’t apply to warrantless searches

E.D.Ky.: Basis for traffic stop doesn’t need to be decided where there was independent RS

There’s no point in quibbling here over the basis of the traffic stop because the officer had reasonable suspicion of drug trafficking, too. United States v. Mejia-Palacio, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 128922 (E.D. Ky. July 25, 2017), adopted, 2017 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Basis for traffic stop doesn’t need to be decided where there was independent RS

M.D.La.: No standing in a stolen car

The stop was justified by a seatbelt violation, but defendant didn’t have standing because the car was stolen. United States v. Joseph, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123893 (M.D. La. Aug. 7, 2017). The landing in front of an apartment is … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Emergency / exigency, Standing | Comments Off on M.D.La.: No standing in a stolen car

MI: Leaving backpack in car def was ordered out of was a lack of standing when the car got searched

Defendant lacked standing in his own backpack in a vehicle that was subject to search for impoundment for having no valid LPN under People v. LaBelle, 478 Mich. 891, 732 N.W.2d 114 (2007). The motion to suppress was properly denied. … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on MI: Leaving backpack in car def was ordered out of was a lack of standing when the car got searched

D.Minn.: The gov’t cites a three-way circuit split on standing in a rental car; the circuit authority controls

Defendant was driving a rental car with permission of the renter, and that gives him standing in this circuit. There is a three way circuit split, and this court can’t resolve that. United States v. Bettis, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Immigration checkpoints, Standing | Comments Off on D.Minn.: The gov’t cites a three-way circuit split on standing in a rental car; the circuit authority controls