D.Minn.: The gov’t cites a three-way circuit split on standing in a rental car; the circuit authority controls

Defendant was driving a rental car with permission of the renter, and that gives him standing in this circuit. There is a three way circuit split, and this court can’t resolve that. United States v. Bettis, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125294 (D. Minn. June 19, 2017),* adopted, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124451 (D. Minn. Aug. 7, 2017).*

Defendant’s refusal to take a breath test was admissible and subject to comment. Szopinski v. State, 2017 Ga. App. LEXIS 373 (Aug. 9, 2017).*

At this Arizona immigration checkpoint, “Even though Agent Renteria’s brief questioning regarding citizenship revealed that Sam is a member of the Tohono O’odham Nation, Sam’s suspicious demeanor justified further detention.” United States v. Sam, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121310 (D.Ariz. Aug. 2, 2017).*

This entry was posted in Immigration checkpoints, Standing. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.