M.D.La.: No standing in a stolen car

The stop was justified by a seatbelt violation, but defendant didn’t have standing because the car was stolen. United States v. Joseph, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123893 (M.D. La. Aug. 7, 2017).

The landing in front of an apartment is the same as curtilage. The officer’s presence there was justified by the emergency doctrine because of an alleged domestic dispute. United States v. Pelayo, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124146 (D. Nev. June 13, 2017),* reconsideration denied, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123488 (D. Nev. July 25, 2017).*

This entry was posted in Curtilage, Emergency / exigency, Standing. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.