Category Archives: Emergency / exigency

M.D.La.: Leaving one’s garage door open is not a waiver of REP or standing

Defendant’s garage door was left open, and that reduced his reasonable expectation of privacy in it, but that didn’t mean he had no standing. By leaving open the garage, defendant didn’t invite the police in, and exigent circumstances or a … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Standing | Comments Off on M.D.La.: Leaving one’s garage door open is not a waiver of REP or standing

LA5: Knock-and-talk cannot be used to create exigency

Officers came to defendant’s house because a couple of drug suspects had visited him. The officers’ knock-and-talk didn’t gain them entry into the house, and a knock-and-talk can’t be used to create exigent circumstances. A protective sweep was unjustified because … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Independent source, Knock and talk | Comments Off on LA5: Knock-and-talk cannot be used to create exigency

NY3: No exigency justified this entry; exclusionary rule applies in NY probation revo proceedings

There was no emergency basis for entry into defendant’s apartment, a probationer. The police understood that another person might be there who they were curious about. Still, there was no justification for the warrantless entry with gun drawn at midnight. … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Exclusionary rule, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on NY3: No exigency justified this entry; exclusionary rule applies in NY probation revo proceedings

GA: Trial judge’s order of defense counsel to be drug tested violated 4A; ADA’s SW for blood test next day was valid, however

Defense counsel appeared to the trial judge to be under the influence of something, and the judge ordered a recess. Defense counsel came back to finish the trial after a few hours, and the condition still existed. The court ordered … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on GA: Trial judge’s order of defense counsel to be drug tested violated 4A; ADA’s SW for blood test next day was valid, however

N.D.W.Va.: No standing in car where permission to borrow had been revoked

Defendant had permission to possess and drive a car for a while, but it had been rescinded by the time of the search. Therefore, he lacked standing in the car. United States v. Leclear, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106550 (N.D. … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Probation / Parole search, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.W.Va.: No standing in car where permission to borrow had been revoked

W.D.Mo.: Unaccounted for gun and likely presence of another inside was exigency for entry to look for it

Defendant was arrested outside his house, and a firearm expected to be on him was not found during his search incident. There was expected to be another person in the house, and that, coupled with the unaccounted for gun, was … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Unaccounted for gun and likely presence of another inside was exigency for entry to look for it

MO erroneously suggests bad faith for exclusionary rule requires pattern and practice evidence

The question of consent from a disturbed and hallucinating man is moot–the state relies on exigent circumstances. In the process, however, the court suggests that defendant’s argument the police acted with bad faith might require pattern and practice evidence of … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on MO erroneously suggests bad faith for exclusionary rule requires pattern and practice evidence

TX: Even if suppression motion is made in trial, state bears burden on a warrantless search

Whether a motion to suppress is filed pretrial or during trial, if the search is shown to be warrantless, the burden shifts to the state to prove the legality of the warrantless search. White v. State, 2018 Tex. Crim. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Emergency / exigency, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on TX: Even if suppression motion is made in trial, state bears burden on a warrantless search

LA3: Ping order for def’s cell phone was based on exigency

The police ping request to locate defendant’s phone to locate him was based on clear exigent circumstances. Thus, it did not violate the Stored Communications Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2702(c)(4). State v. Malveaux, 2018 La. App. LEXIS 1082 (La. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Emergency / exigency, Standing | Comments Off on LA3: Ping order for def’s cell phone was based on exigency

D.Mont.: No SW needed for non-tribal officer to enter a reservation

The search here was in a remote area on the Crow Nation. First, officers had exigency because it was cold, raining, and getting dark, and evidence might be lost. Also, defendant was abandoned there by his assault victim, and he … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on D.Mont.: No SW needed for non-tribal officer to enter a reservation

NY3: Smell and smoke from working meth lab in garage was exigency

The officer pulled into defendant’s driveway and defendant came out and was really nervous. Smoke was coming out a window in the garage that smelled like a meth cook. There was exigency for entry without a warrant. People v. Alberts, … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY3: Smell and smoke from working meth lab in garage was exigency

CA11: Interrupted residential burglary is exigency for police entry and search

“Police officers interrupt what they reasonably believe to be a residential burglary and detain two suspects just outside the house. Having done so, can the officers thereafter lawfully enter the home—without a warrant, and without further suspicion of wrongdoing—to briefly … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA11: Interrupted residential burglary is exigency for police entry and search

PA: Def consented to recordings of jail calls, and this is an exception to the state wiretap statute

The trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law were completely wrong. Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy concerning his jail calls made over a television monitor and through a computer system. This was a case of consent … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Emergency / exigency, Plain view, feel, smell, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on PA: Def consented to recordings of jail calls, and this is an exception to the state wiretap statute

IN: Def slumped over steering wheel in hospital parking lot justified look in car based on emergency aid exception

A deputy sheriff was doing off-duty security work at a hospital same day surgery parking lot when he saw the defendant slumped over his steering wheel, the door open, and the engine off. When the officer turned on his take … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on IN: Def slumped over steering wheel in hospital parking lot justified look in car based on emergency aid exception

E.D.Mich.: A 16 year old girl, over the age of consent, was in a hotel room with a 45 year old man; that alone was not exigency

A 16 year old girl, over the age of consent, was in a hotel room with a 45 year old man. That alone did not create exigent circumstances. Certainly the parents would be concerned, but there was no evidence that … Continue reading →

Posted in Community caretaking function, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: A 16 year old girl, over the age of consent, was in a hotel room with a 45 year old man; that alone was not exigency

W.D.Okla.: DOJ subpoena issued under the Right to Financial Privacy Act was “relevant to [a] law enforcement inquiry”

A DOJ subpoena issued under the Right to Financial Privacy Act of 1978, 12 U.S.C. §§ 3401-3422 (“RFPA”). “Having carefully reviewed the United States’ detailed response, the Court finds that there is a reasonable belief that the records sought are … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on W.D.Okla.: DOJ subpoena issued under the Right to Financial Privacy Act was “relevant to [a] law enforcement inquiry”

M.D.Ala.: Emergency aid exception doesn’t apply to justify entry where victims are accounted for outside

The government didn’t meet its burden of showing the emergency aid exception applied where all the purported victims were accounted for and outside the apartment they wanted to search. The protective sweep doctrine as an alternative doesn’t apply here because … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Protective sweep | Comments Off on M.D.Ala.: Emergency aid exception doesn’t apply to justify entry where victims are accounted for outside

NV: Even if PBT was a 4A violation, SW was moot because there was both PC and exigency for warrantless search

The trial court erred in suppressing the telephonic search warrant for defendant’s blood. Even if the PBT was unconstitutional, there was both probable cause and exigent circumstances without even considering it. State v. Sample, 134 Nev. Adv. Op. 23, 2018 … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on NV: Even if PBT was a 4A violation, SW was moot because there was both PC and exigency for warrantless search

D.Neb.: Def’s Franks IAC claim fails for lack of any allegations of fact

“Lloyd makes four claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. Those claims border on the ridiculous.” As to his Fourth Amendment IAC claim for not making a Franks challenge, he alleges nothing was false. United States v. Lloyd, 2018 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Def’s Franks IAC claim fails for lack of any allegations of fact

CA9: Shell casings in front of house corroborated shooting call police received then def “blatantly lied” about somebody else in house

Police received a call about an emergency at defendant’s house. Once there, defendant came outside and promptly lied about anybody else being inside because they’d seen somebody just enter, and there were shell casings in the front yard corroborating that … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA9: Shell casings in front of house corroborated shooting call police received then def “blatantly lied” about somebody else in house