W.D.N.Y.: Possibility of co-conspirators in mass murder justified emergency disclosure request to Apple, Verizon, and Facebook

In the Buffalo Tops Grocery mass shooting, the emergency disclosure request to Apple, Facebook, and Verizon was based on the possibility there were coconspirators. Even though defendant’s manifesto said he was acting alone, investigators didn’t have to take that at face value. CSLI was also validly obtained for the period of his planning, and that showed nexus. Defendant’s claims of “unknowns” about how the Verizon warrant was executed didn’t merit a hearing on alleged defects in execution defendant hoped to find. United States v. Gendron, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109541 (W.D.N.Y. May 18, 2026). See § 25.21 (Sirhan Sirhan case arising in 1968 involved a warrantless search of his house because of the possibility of co-conspirators.).

There was reasonable suspicion defendant wasn’t driving in his lane, and that supported the stop. Then, drugs were in plain view in the vehicle. State v. Alberts, 2026 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 374 (June 25, 2026).*

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in a prison cell. Gregory v. State, 2026 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 88 (June 26, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Cell phones, Emergency / exigency, Plain view, feel, smell, Prison and jail searches, Social media warrants. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.