Category Archives: Consent

W.D.Pa.: 71 minutes for consent search of car on PA Turnpike didn’t make it unreasonable per se

Defendant consented in writing to a search of his vehicle but it took 71 minutes before any drugs were found. The length of search alone does not make it unreasonable nor violate the terms of the consent. If he had … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonableness | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: 71 minutes for consent search of car on PA Turnpike didn’t make it unreasonable per se

OH3: Where the drug dog arrived at the scene before the traffic ticket was written, the dog sniff did not extend the stop

Where the drug dog arrived at the scene before the traffic ticket was written, the dog sniff did not extend the stop and was valid. State v. Mote, 2015-Ohio-3715, 2015 Ohio App. LEXIS 3616 (3d Dist. September 14, 2015). A … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Dog sniff, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on OH3: Where the drug dog arrived at the scene before the traffic ticket was written, the dog sniff did not extend the stop

WI: No REP in a text message sent to another cell phone

A person has a reasonable expectation of privacy in text messages in his own phone, but not the text messages in another phone that he sent. Once a text message is released, all control over it is lost. State v. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on WI: No REP in a text message sent to another cell phone

N.D.Ill.: Prior limited consent showed this search was by consent

Defendant consented to search of his cell phone. Proof of knowledge of rights comes from the fact he earlier gave a limited consent to search other property. United States v. Thurman, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117893 (N.D. Ill. September 3, … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Prior limited consent showed this search was by consent

TX1: Mere acquiescence can still be consent[!]

While the Texas standard of consent is clear and convincing evidence, “even a finding of ‘“[m]ere acquiescence” may constitute a finding of consent.’ Meekins, 340 S.W.3d at 463-64.” [apparently even though SCOTUS says no]. Hutchins v. State, 2015 Tex. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Pretext, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TX1: Mere acquiescence can still be consent[!]

WA: PC for intoxication is what must be shown, not particularly drug or alcohol

In a felony DUI case under, probable cause to suspect drug intoxication did not have to be identified separately from probable cause to suspect alcohol intoxication, and the affidavit for the warrant was sufficient. The warrant had sufficient particularity to … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on WA: PC for intoxication is what must be shown, not particularly drug or alcohol

CA5: Ptfs’ failure to show lack of PC doomed § 1983 case

There was no effort on the part of plaintiffs to show that their arrest was without probable cause. They submitted city recall petitions, but some of the names were friends and relatives of the persons being recalled. The recallees hired … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: Ptfs’ failure to show lack of PC doomed § 1983 case

D.N.M.: Gov’t fails to show consent for search of person; body recording doesn’t back it up

Defendant did not consent to a search of her person on a stop on a train. Defendant’s alleged “okay” on the body recording made by the officer and shown on the government’s transcript is an incoherent mumble, and not clear … Continue reading

Posted in Body cameras, Consent | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Gov’t fails to show consent for search of person; body recording doesn’t back it up

CA3: Sexual advances in a gov’tal workplace are not a Fourth Amendment search or seizure

“While Fourth Amendment protections may extend to ‘[s]earches and seizures by government employers or supervisors,’ O’Connor v. Ortega, 480 U.S. 709, 715, 107 S. Ct. 1492, 94 L. Ed. 2d 714 (1987), we agree with the District Court that the … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Search, Seizure | Comments Off on CA3: Sexual advances in a gov’tal workplace are not a Fourth Amendment search or seizure

CA6: Handcuffing too tight is excessive force, and it’s well settled

It has been settled in the Sixth Circuit since 1991 that handcuffing a suspect too tight is a constitutitonal violation, so there is no qualified immunity for it. Baynes v. Cleland, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 14824 (6th Cir. August 24, … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Excessive force, Private search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: Handcuffing too tight is excessive force, and it’s well settled

ID: Implied consent applied to unconscious DUI suspect

Defense counsel was not ineffective for not objecting to a blood draw while defendant was unconscious from a car wreck. “Here, Sims impliedly consented to be tested for alcohol by driving a motor vehicle in Idaho. At no point did … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on ID: Implied consent applied to unconscious DUI suspect

NE: The fact defendant in a DUI case has a difficult choice between consenting to BAC search or refusing consent with the attendant possible penalties does not make his consent involuntary

The fact defendant in a DUI case has a difficult choice between consenting to BAC search or refusing consent with the attendant possible penalties does not make his consent involuntary. State v. Modlin, 291 Neb. 660, 2015 Neb. LEXIS 152 … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on NE: The fact defendant in a DUI case has a difficult choice between consenting to BAC search or refusing consent with the attendant possible penalties does not make his consent involuntary

OR: “right result, wrong reason” rule not applied where it denies defense chance to litigate it

After reversal by the state supreme court and on remand, the state argued an alternative basis (“right result, wrong reason”) for affirming, but the court of appeals held that the alternative basis had not been raised before and couldn’t be … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OR: “right result, wrong reason” rule not applied where it denies defense chance to litigate it

D.Colo.: Threat to have CPS take child made consent involuntary

The officers told defendant that if she didn’t consent she’d be arrested, and CPS was on standby to take custody of her child, aside from the fact there were seven officers there. The consent was coerced. United States v. Thorson, … Continue reading

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on D.Colo.: Threat to have CPS take child made consent involuntary

FL3: 3-4 police vehicles blocking def and taking ID and car keys led to consent being involuntary

Defendant did not consent because of a show of authority. “Despite the fact that, in this instance, the police were polite and did not draw their weapons, there was nevertheless the appearance of police authority and the circumstances were coercive … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on FL3: 3-4 police vehicles blocking def and taking ID and car keys led to consent being involuntary

E.D.Mich.: Continuing stop after def proved he wasn’t person police were looking for was unreasonable

Officers stopped defendant thinking he was another. After defendant proved he was not the man they were looking for, they continued to detain him to check for warrants. He refused to consent to a patdown, and the officer then touched … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Continuing stop after def proved he wasn’t person police were looking for was unreasonable

MA: Def was in CODIS four times; first might be illegal but rest were attenuated

Defendant contended that a 2000 blood sample that ended up in CODIS that connected him in a cold case hit was unreasonably obtained. However, he also had three other samples in the system that were not because of his convictions … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Consent, DNA, Exclusionary rule, Racial profiling, Seizure | Comments Off on MA: Def was in CODIS four times; first might be illegal but rest were attenuated

VA: “Assuming the position” when a frisk is requested by an officer is a consent to a frisk

“Assuming the position” when a frisk is requested by an officer is a consent to a frisk. Hawkins v. Commonwealth, 2015 Va. App. LEXIS 237 (August 4, 2015). Defendant was observed doing a hand to hand transaction on a New … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Consent, School searches | Comments Off on VA: “Assuming the position” when a frisk is requested by an officer is a consent to a frisk

CA7: Def lived with grandparents, and they could consent to search of bomb making stuff in basement

Defendant who lived with his grandparents had “mental health issues” and expressed “anti-government sentiment.” They called the police because he was making M-80’s in the basement, and M-80s were classified as explosive devices. They police and ATF came warrantless to … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on CA7: Def lived with grandparents, and they could consent to search of bomb making stuff in basement

N.D.Ga.: Just because one feels he has no choice but to consent, that doesn’t mean it’s involuntary

“Even if Sharp did feel that he had no choice but to consent, under the totality of the circumstances it is clear that he knowingly and voluntarily consented to the search of his laptop and online accounts, and that his … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Probable cause | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Just because one feels he has no choice but to consent, that doesn’t mean it’s involuntary