E.D.Mich.: Continuing stop after def proved he wasn’t person police were looking for was unreasonable

Officers stopped defendant thinking he was another. After defendant proved he was not the man they were looking for, they continued to detain him to check for warrants. He refused to consent to a patdown, and the officer then touched his arm, and he fled. After he was captured, he was found to be a FIPF. The detention was unreasonable after he showed he was not who they thought he was. United States v. Fuller, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105000 (E.D.Mich. August 11, 2015), R&R 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21551 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 24, 2015).

Trial court’s finding that defendant’s consent was involuntary was supported by the evidence and it was affirmed. He consented to the search after an officer implied that he might be taken to jail that night, and the officer engaged defendant in conversation while he was surrounded by three officers, with another there, and the patrol car lights on. State v. Deemer, 2015-Ohio-3199, 2015 Ohio App. LEXIS 3110 (5th Dist. August 7, 2015).

When a city employee has taken sick leave, the city’s home visits under city policy to verify are not a violation of the Fourth Amendment. Taylor v. City of Shreveport, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 14217 (5th Cir. August 13, 2015).

This entry was posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.