ID: Implied consent applied to unconscious DUI suspect

Defense counsel was not ineffective for not objecting to a blood draw while defendant was unconscious from a car wreck. “Here, Sims impliedly consented to be tested for alcohol by driving a motor vehicle in Idaho. At no point did Sims object to or resist the blood draw. His alleged unconsciousness does not effectively operate as a withdrawal of his consent. Therefore, Sims’ statutorily implied consent was effective at the time of the blood draw.” Sims v. State, 2015 Ida. App. LEXIS 74 (August 24, 2015).*

Statute requires that a DUI blood draw be done without using a prep pad that has alcohol in it. A dry one did not violate the statute or the Fourth Amendment and require suppression. The trial court erred in requiring strict compliance. State v. Kleiber, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 12527 (Fla. 5th DCA August 21, 2015).*

Officers had reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop for pimping after developing him as a suspect from the arrest of one of his workers. When officers approached him he admitting having a gun, and that led to handcuffing and a felony arrest which was legal. United States v. Fortenberry, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109583 (D.Nev. July 10, 2015).*

This entry was posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.