Category Archives: Franks doctrine

M.D.Fla.: “[T]here is no constitutional right to be free from arrest on the basis of illegally obtained evidence.”

“[T]here is no constitutional right to be free from arrest on the basis of illegally obtained evidence.” Santiago v. Swain, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 194607 (M.D. Fla. Oct. 31, 2023).* Plaintiff’s civil Franks claim fails because there was probable cause … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Collective knowledge, Franks doctrine, Waiver | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: “[T]here is no constitutional right to be free from arrest on the basis of illegally obtained evidence.”

KY: State could refer at trial to SW for DNA, but it couldn’t say def refused consent

It was not error to permit the state to inquire that a search warrant was used to get defendant’s DNA, as long as there was no reference to his refusal of consent. Finch v. Commonwealth, 2023 Ky. LEXIS 302 (Oct. … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Consent, Franks doctrine, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on KY: State could refer at trial to SW for DNA, but it couldn’t say def refused consent

D.Neb.: Open container violation justifies a search of the passenger compartment

An open container violation justifies a search of the passenger compartment. United States v. Smith, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 192108 (D. Neb. Oct. 24, 2023). The warrant affidavit’s discussion of the silver truck was a reasonable inference and not a … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Franks doctrine, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Open container violation justifies a search of the passenger compartment

TX5: A safe removed from a car under the automobile exception was subject to search without a warrant

A safe removed from a car that was otherwise subject to search under the automobile exception was still subject to a warrantless search after it was removed and taken to the police station. Defendant’s effort to compare it to a … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Automobile exception, Cell phones, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on TX5: A safe removed from a car under the automobile exception was subject to search without a warrant

NY Suffolk Co.: Entry under Extreme Risk Protection Order statute for potential suicide was exigent

“The Court finds that the search conducted pursuant to the E[xtreme] R[isk] P[rotection] O[rder] statute was reasonable. P.O. Keenan provided sworn testimony as to the basis for his belief that defendant was expressing suicidal ideations (defendant’s text messages), and recounted … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY Suffolk Co.: Entry under Extreme Risk Protection Order statute for potential suicide was exigent

S.D.N.Y.: Def doesn’t show Colombia wiretap was U.S. instigated

Defendants produced nothing to show that U.S. officers enlisted Colombian officers to wiretap their phones there. United States v. Ruiz, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 186612 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 16, 2023).* Just because there were discrepancies between the testimony at the suppression … Continue reading

Posted in Foreign searches, Franks doctrine, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Def doesn’t show Colombia wiretap was U.S. instigated

CA11: Officer gets QI for ordering passenger to produce ID

The officer in a Florida traffic stop could get the driver out of the vehicle as a matter of course under Mimms. Under Maryland v. Wilson, he could order the passenger out, too. It was not clearly established law that … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Plain view, feel, smell, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Officer gets QI for ordering passenger to produce ID

ID: Inventory as pretext for investigatory searches unreasonble

An inventory search that is a pretext for an investigatory search is unreasonable. Remanded for reconsideration of this issue. State v. Ramos, 2023 Ida. LEXIS 123 (Sep. 29, 2023). techdirt: The Casual Cruelty Of Cops: Inventory Search Edition by Tim … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Franks doctrine, Inventory, Waiver | Comments Off on ID: Inventory as pretext for investigatory searches unreasonble

W.D.La.: Failure to make a timely return of SW papers is not a const’l error

Failure to make a timely return of the warrant to the issuing court is not a constitutional error, and there is no showing of prejudice. United States v. Warren, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176014 (W.D. La. Aug. 18, 2023), adopted, … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity, Warrant papers | Comments Off on W.D.La.: Failure to make a timely return of SW papers is not a const’l error

W.D.Va.: No objective REP in hospital room against police entry to question about shooting

Plaintiff did not have an objective reasonable expectation of privacy in preventing entry into his hospital room by law enforcement officers investing his shooting. Stoots v. Sparti, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175529 (W.D. Va. Sep. 29, 2023). “Nor does the … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Pretext, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on W.D.Va.: No objective REP in hospital room against police entry to question about shooting

PA: LPR systems don’t violate motorists REP

“Whether use of a License Plate Reader (‘LPR’) system to track Appellant’s movements is a search under the Fourth Amendment is a question of first impression before this Court. The purpose a license plate attached to a vehicle is to … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on PA: LPR systems don’t violate motorists REP

GA: Unjustified protective sweep suppressed

The “security sweep” of defendant’s dwelling violated the Fourth Amendment. No justification for the entry and no exigent circumstances were shown. Defendant’s alleged consent came after the unlawful entry. Denial of suppression reversed. Thompson v. State, 2023 Ga. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Protective sweep | Comments Off on GA: Unjustified protective sweep suppressed

WV: When asked for consent to search his house, def said ‘F*** it. Come on.’ That was consent.

“After some discussion of his choice to voluntarily agree to a search or wait until a search warrant was obtained, petitioner left the trooper’s vehicle, saying words to the effect of ‘F*** it. Come on.’ He walked toward his house … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on WV: When asked for consent to search his house, def said ‘F*** it. Come on.’ That was consent.

NE: Franks challenge that included allegations that alternative suspects weren’t identified fails

Defendant’s Franks challenge that included allegations that alternative suspects weren’t identified fails. State v. Garcia, 315 Neb. 74 (Sep. 7, 2023). There was no reasonable suspicion to detain defendant for a dog sniff. He answered all the officer’s questions, and … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NE: Franks challenge that included allegations that alternative suspects weren’t identified fails

D.Nev.: Ability to manage day-to-day operations doesn’t give standing over whole business space

(1) “Accordingly, although Defendant had the discretion to manage the day-to-day operation of LLB, the Court finds he did not actually manage the day-to-day operations of the business.” “In this context, ownership of premises alone does not automatically confer standing. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Neutral and detached magistrate, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Ability to manage day-to-day operations doesn’t give standing over whole business space

D.Mass.: SW affidavit based on CI’s tale gets a Franks hearing

Defendant made his “substantial preliminary showing” for a possible Franks violation on the credibility of a CI to at least get a hearing. (And it sounds like he’d prevail at the hearing because the affidavit depended entirely on the CI’s … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on D.Mass.: SW affidavit based on CI’s tale gets a Franks hearing

S.D.W.Va.: Failure to update a prior SW affidavit was careless but not intentionally misleading

The failure to update the original search warrant affidavit with information from an intervening search showed “multiple careless errors, [and the court] could not say that these errors establish recklessness or materiality. There is simply no evidence upon which the … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: Failure to update a prior SW affidavit was careless but not intentionally misleading

D.Minn.: Govt’s learning of another potential crime from “sneak and peak” SW wasn’t entrapment

The government suspected defendant of acquiring a pill press and got a sneak and peak warrant to look around and photograph inside his place. Later, they got a search warrant for the place and seized drugs. The government’s knowledge of … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Sneak and Peek | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Govt’s learning of another potential crime from “sneak and peak” SW wasn’t entrapment

CA9: Franks challenge has to include showing lack of PC

On a Franks challenge, “Defendant failed to establish that, if additional information about the informant’s credibility had been included, the affidavit would have been insufficient to establish probable cause.” United States v. Carter, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 22478 (9th Cir. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of proof, Franks doctrine, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA9: Franks challenge has to include showing lack of PC

CA7: PC can exist even if officer doesn’t believe “putative victim”

“But Garcia has a high hurdle to combat a probable-cause determination because G.C., the putative victim, identified him as responsible. … An officer need not even believe that a witness is reliable to determine that her statement supports probable cause … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on CA7: PC can exist even if officer doesn’t believe “putative victim”