Author Archives: Hall

OH2: Motion to suppress not proper to challenge authentication of a record for trial

A motion to suppress doesn’t lie just because the defense thinks that a record can be authenticated under Rule 901. State v. Wolfe, 2025-Ohio-866 (2d Dist. Mar. 14, 2025). “Because Phillips did not make a contemporaneous objection to either the … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Ineffective assistance, Motion to suppress, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on OH2: Motion to suppress not proper to challenge authentication of a record for trial

IN: Greyhound bus subject to automobile exception because dog alerted on luggage compartment

If you’re riding a bus and drugs are found on one, are all subject to search. The answer can’t be yes, but it is here: Defendant was a passenger on a Greyhound bus on I-80. The bus crossed the centerline … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception | Comments Off on IN: Greyhound bus subject to automobile exception because dog alerted on luggage compartment

D.P.R.: Motion to dismiss for an alleged illegal search is not the proper way to raise the issue

A motion to dismiss for an alleged illegal search is not the proper way to raise the issue. United States v. Ruiz-Ruiz, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47357 (D.P.R. Mar. 12, 2025):

Posted in Motion to suppress | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Motion to dismiss for an alleged illegal search is not the proper way to raise the issue

55 years ago today: NPR: On This Day In 1970: Hruska Links Judge To ‘Mediocre’

NPR: On This Day In 1970: Hruska Links Judge To ‘Mediocre’ by Ken Rudin:

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on 55 years ago today: NPR: On This Day In 1970: Hruska Links Judge To ‘Mediocre’

MD: A search warrant for a car’s GPS system

A search warrant for a car’s GPS system: “Officers also executed a ‘Berla warrant’2 to extract navigation data from the car’s GPS system. The navigation data showed that, on the morning of the shooting, the Maserati left Oak Haven Circle … Continue reading →

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data | Comments Off on MD: A search warrant for a car’s GPS system

CA2: Exigency of potential destruction of evidence has to be “in real time”

This pro se plaintiff was the subject of a sexual assault investigation that led to officers warrantlessly entering and seizing his home for 12½ hours before getting a warrant. Summary judgment was granted the officers. Exigent circumstances didn’t justify the … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on CA2: Exigency of potential destruction of evidence has to be “in real time”

D.Minn.: Probable cause for evidence of tax evasion in the home where records would be

Probable cause for evidence of tax evasion in the home where records would be: “Here, the affidavit sought to establish probable cause to believe Mr. Erickson took part in an ongoing scheme to evade paying taxes. Toward that end, the … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Nexus, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Probable cause for evidence of tax evasion in the home where records would be

E.D.Tenn.: Ammunition on the person is PC for firearm in the home

Possession on the person of a significant amount of ammunition was probable cause and nexus to defendant’s house for the firearm. United States v. Partin, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47025 (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 14, 2025). Probable cause for evidence of … Continue reading →

Posted in Nexus, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Ammunition on the person is PC for firearm in the home

D.N.J.: OSHA site inspection was on a neutral plan and particular

OSHA sought an inspection warrant for a cannabis producer in New Jersey. It was based on a neutral inspection plan [no complaints] and was particular in scope and therefore reasonable under the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Inspection Warrant, 2025 … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Ineffective assistance, Waiver | Comments Off on D.N.J.: OSHA site inspection was on a neutral plan and particular

IN: Crossing the curtilage to get to defendant’s front door at 11:30 pm violated the Indiana Const.

Crossing the curtilage to get to defendant’s front door at 11:30 pm violated the Indiana Constitution under its Litchfield case. State v. Hendricks, 2025 Ind. App. LEXIS 71 (Mar. 12, 2025). Defendant parked in a “no parking” zone at the … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Curtilage, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution | Comments Off on IN: Crossing the curtilage to get to defendant’s front door at 11:30 pm violated the Indiana Const.

E.D.Mo.: Single image that officer opined was CP is PC

“Under Supreme Court and Eighth Circuit law, Detective Erwin’s professional opinion [based on her experience] that the file contained child pornography was sufficient to establish probable case for the issuance of the search warrant. See Ornelas, 517 U.S. at 700; … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Staleness | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Single image that officer opined was CP is PC

M.D.Fla.: Not IAC to not call private searcher at suppression hearing where it wouldn’t have changed the outcome

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not calling a “hotel maid” who found defendant’s gun at the suppression hearing that led to his ACCA sentence. He doesn’t show that she would have changed the outcome. The private search issue was litigated … Continue reading →

Posted in Forfeiture, Ineffective assistance, Knock and announce | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Not IAC to not call private searcher at suppression hearing where it wouldn’t have changed the outcome

CA9: Jury verdict that officer violated clearly established rights and precluded qualified immunity

One defendant was not entitled to qualified immunity on the merits because the jury found that he violated plaintiff’s clearly established Fourth Amendment right to be free from excessive force by using deadly force when he posed no immediate threat. … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: Jury verdict that officer violated clearly established rights and precluded qualified immunity

WA: There was an objective basis for this stop even if with pretext

There was an objective basis for defendant’s stop, even if the officer had subjective motives. State v. Olson, 2025 Wash. App. LEXIS 423 (Mar. 11, 2025).* Defendant was in prison for about 20 years and there were phone calls between … Continue reading →

Posted in Pretext, Reasonableness, Standing | Comments Off on WA: There was an objective basis for this stop even if with pretext

CA5: Stay of § 1983 shooting case was properly denied pending state criminal case

Plaintiff was charged in state court and sued under § 1983 in federal court over his shooting by the police. The federal court refused a stay and plaintiff ended up taking the Fifth. The denial of the stay of the … Continue reading →

Posted in Privileges | Comments Off on CA5: Stay of § 1983 shooting case was properly denied pending state criminal case

NPR: A little-known law is in the spotlight: What to know about the Privacy Act of 1974

NPR: A little-known law is in the spotlight: What to know about the Privacy Act of 1974 by Kathryn Fink, Ailsa Chang & Jeanette Woods (“The Privacy Act of 1974 protects personal information collected across federal agencies. Privacy groups and … Continue reading →

Posted in Informational privacy | Comments Off on NPR: A little-known law is in the spotlight: What to know about the Privacy Act of 1974

CA8: Dog sniff at apt door was reasonable under existing precedent

A drug dog sniff at defendant’s apartment door was reasonable under well-established circuit precedent. There’s no evidence the dog’s nose went under the door. United States v. Peck, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 5710 (8th Cir. Mar. 12, 2025). Plaintiff’s condition … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Dog sniff, Excessive force, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA8: Dog sniff at apt door was reasonable under existing precedent

OR: Petr’s post-conviction 4A denied for lack of specifics and context

Defendant’s post-conviction Fourth Amendment claim was properly denied for not telling the court what evidence was improperly admitted, where it appears in the record, and how it affected the outcome. Zyst v. Kelly, 338 Or App 597 (Mar. 12, 2025). … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Ineffective assistance, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on OR: Petr’s post-conviction 4A denied for lack of specifics and context

D.Mass.: SnapChat warrant didn’t go stale after six months [would it ever?]

SnapChat warrant wasn’t stale: “The passage of more than six months between Cardoso’s messages to Pyrtle and issuance of the October 2021 warrant did not undermine probable cause to believe that data from Pyrtle’s Snapchat account would provide evidence of … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Social media warrants, Staleness | Comments Off on D.Mass.: SnapChat warrant didn’t go stale after six months [would it ever?]

D.D.C.: Under Grubbs, a geofence de-anonymizer SW can’t be challenged before execution

Google responded to a series of search warrants for information and finally objected to a warrant to de-anonymize the information it previously provided. It can’t challenge the warrant before execution under Grubbs. Google LLC v. United States, 2025 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Motion to suppress, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Under Grubbs, a geofence de-anonymizer SW can’t be challenged before execution