Author Archives: Hall

W.D.N.C.: Franks does include a right to a hearing without making a prima facie showing

Defendant doesn’t get an opportunity to test the truth of the affidavit under Franks in a hearing without making a prima facie case of materiality and wilful falsity. United States v. Payne, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 127287 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 9, … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: Franks does include a right to a hearing without making a prima facie showing

W.D.Tenn.: Nothing of exterior of building suggested separate living units inside; officers found def’s door open and unlocked inside

Nothing of the outward appearance of the dwelling that was subject to the search warrant suggested that there were multiple units inside. Thus, officers could not have known until after entry seeing some of the doors with keyed locks, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Scope of search | Comments Off on W.D.Tenn.: Nothing of exterior of building suggested separate living units inside; officers found def’s door open and unlocked inside

AK: State court judgment not “void” for habeas purposes because evidence illegally seized

A state court judgment is not “void” for state habeas purposes because it relies on evidence allegedly obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment. Olson v. State, 2016 Alas. App. LEXIS 172 (Sept. 23, 2016). Defendant saw an unmarked police … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on AK: State court judgment not “void” for habeas purposes because evidence illegally seized

TN: The host had common authority over the guest’s part of the premises; he was only there every other night

Defendant had been staying every other night with his brother who stayed in the property leased by Ms. Bryant. She had common authority over that room and went in it all the time. The trial court did not err in … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Protective sweep | Comments Off on TN: The host had common authority over the guest’s part of the premises; he was only there every other night

NE: A DRE expert isn’t required to make stop have PC for a DWI arrest

It isn’t required that the state have a DRE specialist make an arrest to determine whether there is probable cause for defendant’s arrest. It is required that the officers exclude other possibilities for the appearance of intoxication. State v. Rothenberger, … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Probable cause | Comments Off on NE: A DRE expert isn’t required to make stop have PC for a DWI arrest

E.D.Mich.: Def provided a cell phone to a minor he was trafficking for sex, and he had no REP in it even though he paid for it

Defendant was accused of sex trafficking a minor and provided her a cell phone. She had apparent authority to consent to search of the phone, and it was voluntarily given. United States v. Gardner, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 128480 (E.D.Mich. … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, E-mail, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Def provided a cell phone to a minor he was trafficking for sex, and he had no REP in it even though he paid for it

E.D.Ky.: Even if dog unlawfully came on curtilage, officers’ plain smell of MJ from the street was PC

Officers went to defendant’s house suspecting a grow operation. On the sidewalk in front of his house, they could smell raw marijuana. They went to the door and window air conditioning unit and could smell it. They brought a drug … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Even if dog unlawfully came on curtilage, officers’ plain smell of MJ from the street was PC

NYTimes: Court Leader or Leading Dissenter? Chief Justice’s Fate Tied to Election

NYTimes: Court Leader or Leading Dissenter? Chief Justice’s Fate Tied to Election by Adam Liptak: WASHINGTON — In Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr.’s 11 years on the Supreme Court, his unfolding legacy has been marked by a debate over … Continue reading →

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on NYTimes: Court Leader or Leading Dissenter? Chief Justice’s Fate Tied to Election

D.Del.: Where records examination is voluntary, no 4A claim stated where ptf refuses

The Delaware State Escheater sought an examination of records of Marathon Petroleum, and it refused to comply. The state could not force plaintiff to comply, so there is no search if plaintiff refuses. Marathon Petroleum Corp. v. Cook, 2016 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Search | Comments Off on D.Del.: Where records examination is voluntary, no 4A claim stated where ptf refuses

WaPo: Meet the judge who just released 200 secret government surveillance requests

WaPo: Meet the judge who just released 200 secret government surveillance requests by Spencer Hsu: In ordering the first-ever release by a full federal district court of a year’s worth of secret government surveillance requests, U.S. District Chief Judge Beryl … Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WaPo: Meet the judge who just released 200 secret government surveillance requests

OH10: Leaving house to go to drug deal and returning there was nexus to house

Nexus to defendant’s house for a drug search warrant is shown by the fact that he returned to the house immediately after a drug transaction [what does that prove? Most people go home after work] and left the house to … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Nexus | Comments Off on OH10: Leaving house to go to drug deal and returning there was nexus to house

CA7: Family computer that everybody knew password to gives common authority to all

The computer in the house belonged to defendant but it was a family computer and everybody knew the password. That being the case, any one of them had common authority over the computer to consent to its search. The fact … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Inventory | Comments Off on CA7: Family computer that everybody knew password to gives common authority to all

AR: Just because officer says on video “He’s been arrested for dope, dope, and dope … carrying a weapon” doesn’t mean it still wasn’t a valid inventory

The 4 on the year on the LPN expiration sticker looked funny, so the Trooper ran the LPN and it came back expired in 2011. It had been altered with a marker. Defendant said he borrowed his friend’s pickup. Defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on AR: Just because officer says on video “He’s been arrested for dope, dope, and dope … carrying a weapon” doesn’t mean it still wasn’t a valid inventory

OR: Search of Altoids tin during search of backpack for drugs was reasonable

When searching defendant’s backpack incident to arrest for drugs, the further search of an Altoids tin wasn’t unreasonable because it was a place where drugs would be held. State v. Krause, 281 Ore. App. 143, 2016 Ore. App. LEXIS 1142 … Continue reading →

Posted in Search incident | Comments Off on OR: Search of Altoids tin during search of backpack for drugs was reasonable

CA5: Warning potential victim of a hit on him overheard on a wiretap didn’t dissipate the exigency to try to stop it

The FBI learned through a wiretap that a person had a hit out on him by defendant, and succeeded in finding him and warning him. The mere fact he was warned didn’t dissipate the exigency because, until defendant was rounded … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on CA5: Warning potential victim of a hit on him overheard on a wiretap didn’t dissipate the exigency to try to stop it

Esquire: The Bill of Rights Is Hanging by a Thread

Esquire: The Bill of Rights Is Hanging by a Thread by Charles P. Pierce: The law is supposed to be our protector, not our enemy.

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on Esquire: The Bill of Rights Is Hanging by a Thread

TN: Blood on def’s sock supported PC for automobile exception

Based on blood on defendant’s sock, on the totality there was probable cause to believe that more possible blood evidence would be found in his car. That was sufficient for the automobile exception to apply. State v. Peden, 2016 Tenn. … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TN: Blood on def’s sock supported PC for automobile exception

S.D.Iowa finds Playpen NIT warrant violation of Rule 41 and Fourth Amendment

S.D.Iowa joins minority and finds Playpen NIT warrant violation of Rule 41 also a Fourth Amendment violation. United States v. Croghan, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 127479 (S.D.Iowa Sept. 19, 2016):

Posted in F.R.Crim.P. 41 | Comments Off on S.D.Iowa finds Playpen NIT warrant violation of Rule 41 and Fourth Amendment

IL: Stop for failure to signal lane movement was not unreasonable where no case said officer couldn’t make stop

The officer’s stop of defendant for not using his turn signal when the signal lane became two lanes was at least a mistake of law under Heien, already recognized in Illinois. No state case addresses these facts, and it’s not … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on IL: Stop for failure to signal lane movement was not unreasonable where no case said officer couldn’t make stop

E.D.Va.: Def claimed on post-conviction defense counsel promised win on motion to suppress; hearing has to be held

Defendant in his 2255 claimed defense counsel promised that he could win a motion to suppress. Defense counsel denied it, saying he reviewed the file and told defendant it was a hopeless motion. A hearing has to be held. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Def claimed on post-conviction defense counsel promised win on motion to suppress; hearing has to be held