W.D.N.Y.: No due process right to adversarial hearing before issuance of a DNA warrant

Officers had a search warrant for defendant’s DNA. He had no due process right to contest it before issuance. United States v. Ibrahim, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 260838 (W.D.N.Y. Nov. 13, 2026).

“Indeed, Officer Selleny’s unrebutted testimony, which the trial court found credible, is bolstered by the explanation El himself provided for his presence. Assuming El was being truthful with the officers, this precise location – immediately adjacent to a fenced-off, decommissioned public building – was so prone to mischief that R-CAP was contracted to provide late-night armed security there. It would be illogical to conclude that patrol officers lacked reasonable suspicion to investigate when they observed, at nearly midnight, an unmarked vehicle of a type typically stolen parked in exactly that spot.” State v. El, 2026-Ohio-4489 (8th Dist. Nov. 12, 2026).*

Defendant consented to officers entering his hotel room to look for people, and that supported their plain view of drugs. United States v. Kimble, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 259528 (N.D. Tex. Nov. 12, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Consent, DNA, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.