Author Archives: Hall

D.Nev.: GPS warrant based on transaction from car three weeks earlier wasn’t stale

A GPS tracking warrant wasn’t stale based on a drug deal out of the car three weeks earlier. That led to probable cause to stop and search the vehicle two weeks later. United States v. Cabrera, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, GPS / Tracking Data, Staleness | Comments Off on D.Nev.: GPS warrant based on transaction from car three weeks earlier wasn’t stale

IL: Heroin overdose victim injected with Narcan is PC to arrest for possession

When the police come upon a heroin overdose and inject Narcan, there is probable cause to arrest the defendant for possession. People v. Teper, 2016 IL App (2d) 160063, 2016 Ill. App. LEXIS 794 (Nov. 17, 2016):

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on IL: Heroin overdose victim injected with Narcan is PC to arrest for possession

CO: Officers had clear indication def had drugs in mouth for body search on exigency

There was a clear indication that defendant had hidden drugs in his mouth, and that was exigency for a search of his mouth. When the state as appellee argues there is probable cause for defendant’s arrest and the opening brief … Continue reading →

Posted in Body searches, Burden of proof | Comments Off on CO: Officers had clear indication def had drugs in mouth for body search on exigency

NJ rejects the state’s prior subjective inadvertence requirement of the plain view doctrine

The prior subjective inadvertence requirement of the plain view doctrine is rejected prospectively only. State v. Gonzales, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 1177 (Nov. 15, 2016) (summary by the court):

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on NJ rejects the state’s prior subjective inadvertence requirement of the plain view doctrine

CA11: Arguable probable cause entitles the officer to qualified immunity

Arguable probable cause entitles the officer to qualified immunity, here for a mental health seizure. May v. City of Nahunta, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 20501 (11th Cir. Nov. 15, 2016), same result on rehearing, May v. City of Nahunta, 2017 … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Qualified immunity, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA11: Arguable probable cause entitles the officer to qualified immunity

WA prescription drug monitoring program doesn’t violate 4A or state const’l rights of physicians

The Washington prescription drug monitoring program records do not violate the Fourth Amendment or state constitutional rights of physicians. Alsager v. Bd. of Osteopathic Med. & Surgery, 2016 Wash. App. LEXIS 2768 (Nov. 15, 2016):

Posted in Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on WA prescription drug monitoring program doesn’t violate 4A or state const’l rights of physicians

MA: Officer’s observation of obvious drug transaction by car pulling up on street was PC

The experienced police officer’s observation of defendant reaching into a car with Maine LPN was consistent with “car meets” for drug sales, and that was probable cause. Commonwealth v. Sanders, 2016 Mass. App. LEXIS 164 (Nov. 15, 2016). Plaintiff complained … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Probable cause | Comments Off on MA: Officer’s observation of obvious drug transaction by car pulling up on street was PC

IN: Seizure of person justified under community caretaking function

A seizure of the person may be justified under the community caretaking function when the person appears so intoxicated or out of it that he’s a danger to himself or others. McNeal v. State, 2016 Ind. App. LEXIS 408 (Nov. … Continue reading →

Posted in Community caretaking function | Comments Off on IN: Seizure of person justified under community caretaking function

Cal.3d: This suspicionless parole search wasn’t unreasonable or harassing

While a suspicionless search condition can be harassing and thus unreasonable, this one wasn’t. People v. Perkins, 2016 Cal. App. LEXIS 980 (3d Dist. Nov. 14, 2016):

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on Cal.3d: This suspicionless parole search wasn’t unreasonable or harassing

W.D.Ark.: Search for electronic evidence can be intense; digital media can be “mere centimeters long”

A search for digital evidence in a Facebook threat case led to a plain view of firearms and drugs, and the search was valid. The digital evidence could have been on flash drives “mere centimeters long” and that permitted an … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Seizure | Comments Off on W.D.Ark.: Search for electronic evidence can be intense; digital media can be “mere centimeters long”

VA ABC agent correctly fired for violating pending licensee’s rights during administrative search

Appellant was an ABC officer terminated for violating the Fourth Amendment rights of a pending licensee by searching in excess of their government’s ability to administratively search or the pending licensee’s consent. The termination decision was affirmed. He argued the … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Standing | Comments Off on VA ABC agent correctly fired for violating pending licensee’s rights during administrative search

FLETC training website link added

Federal Law Enforcement Training Center Resources added to the research materials on the right side Be sure to check your state law enforcement training schedules. In Arkansas, first year training includes 2 hours on search and seizure law. I did … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on FLETC training website link added

OH11: Trial court’s finding of no RS to delay the stop was clearly erroneous

The trial court’s finding that the officer delayed the stop without reasonable suspicion is clearly erroneous because the record does not support the finding. State v. Taylor, 2016-Ohio-7745, 2016 Ohio App. LEXIS 4613 (11th Dist. Nov. 14, 2016):

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review | Comments Off on OH11: Trial court’s finding of no RS to delay the stop was clearly erroneous

CA5: “criminal activity underfoot” was reasonable suspicion

Court seemingly confuses “criminal activity a foot” with “criminal activity underfoot.” Leaving a gun in a stranger’s car here was reasonable suspicion for further action. United States v. Cook, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 20339 (5th Cir. Nov. 11, 2016):

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA5: “criminal activity underfoot” was reasonable suspicion

WSJ: Cellphone Smudges Yield a Trove of Forensic Data

WSJ: Cellphone Smudges Yield a Trove of Forensic Data by Robert Lee Hotz: Researchers say molecules and microbes left on phone, keys, credit cards can linger for months.

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on WSJ: Cellphone Smudges Yield a Trove of Forensic Data

ID: Officer writing ticket providing backup to drug dog abandoned traffic ticket making it a criminal investigation; suppressed

The officer’s delaying of the traffic stop for 2½ minutes while performing a back-up function for a drug dog sweep violated defendant’s rights under the Fourth Amendment, because the seizure, initially valid based on a cracked windshield, became unreasonable after … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on ID: Officer writing ticket providing backup to drug dog abandoned traffic ticket making it a criminal investigation; suppressed

CA6: Rule 41(g) motion for return of property doesn’t lie in federal court when state officers seized, even in a federal prosecution

Rule 41(g) motion for return of property requires that officers of the federal government have seized it. Where state and local authorities seized the property, a 41(g) motion doesn’t lie in federal court. United States v. Price, 2016 U.S. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on CA6: Rule 41(g) motion for return of property doesn’t lie in federal court when state officers seized, even in a federal prosecution

N.D.Ga.: Landlord had apparent authority to consent because of writ of possession

Defendant’s landlord had a writ of possession from a state court and had evicted him from the premises. He called the police and the police saw the writ of possession, and they had no reason to question it. The court … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Landlord had apparent authority to consent because of writ of possession

MD: Dog sniff two months earlier didn’t justify search incident on arrest

Defendant’s car was subjected to a drug dog sniff in March 2014 finding drugs, but he wasn’t arrested. Arrest warrants were issued later, and two months later he was arrested. A search incident for drugs wasn’t valid two months later, … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Probable cause | Comments Off on MD: Dog sniff two months earlier didn’t justify search incident on arrest

N.D.Cal.: Cursory look at cell phone that revealed nothing doesn’t preclude PC for SW

A cursory search of a codefendant’s phone produced nothing and a cursory look at defendant’s phone didn’t either. That does not, however, preclude a finding of probable cause to believe that there was evidence on the phone for a search … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Probable cause | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Cursory look at cell phone that revealed nothing doesn’t preclude PC for SW