WA prescription drug monitoring program doesn’t violate 4A or state const’l rights of physicians

The Washington prescription drug monitoring program records do not violate the Fourth Amendment or state constitutional rights of physicians. Alsager v. Bd. of Osteopathic Med. & Surgery, 2016 Wash. App. LEXIS 2768 (Nov. 15, 2016):

¶40 … We hold that prescription records kept under the prescription monitoring program, either by a pharmacist or as part of the state database, are not protected from all governmental examination by the Fourth Amendment or article I, section 7. Records of prescriptions for scheduled controlled substances are subject to legitimate oversight by appropriate agents of the State if reasonably tailored to the enforcement of state law and if effective safeguards against unauthorized further disclosure are present. Acting under these constraints, the Department and the Board did not intrude into a zone of privacy protected by either the state or federal constitutions by the examination of Alsager’s prescription records kept under the prescription monitoring program, whether in the state database or held by a pharmacist. Therefore, the Department and the Board did not violate either constitutional guarantee through this examination.

This entry was posted in Third Party Doctrine. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.