Author Archives: Hall

WaPo: Supreme Court to hear Microsoft case: A question of law and borders

WaPo: Supreme Court to hear Microsoft case: A question of law and borders by Ellen Nakashima:

Posted in E-mail, F.R.Crim.P. 41, SCOTUS | Comments Off on WaPo: Supreme Court to hear Microsoft case: A question of law and borders

D.Mass.: Overseizure by retention of unresponsive emails seized under SW doesn’t require suppression of all

Defendant contends that the overseizure and retention of emails obtained by warrant that aren’t relevant to the crime under investigation requires suppression of even that which was validly obtained. No court has gone that far. His creative attempt to extend … Continue reading →

Posted in E-mail, Overseizure | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Overseizure by retention of unresponsive emails seized under SW doesn’t require suppression of all

OR: Def disavowed consent issue in trial court, so he couldn’t argue it on appeal

Defendant disavowed the argument made on appeal in the trial court, and you just can’t do that. “Defendant failed to preserve his argument because he failed to provide the trial court with an objection, let alone ‘an explanation of his … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on OR: Def disavowed consent issue in trial court, so he couldn’t argue it on appeal

InCyberDefense: IMSI Catchers Revive a Heated Debate on Privacy versus Security

InCyberDefense: IMSI Catchers Revive a Heated Debate on Privacy versus Security by Wes O’Donnell. States where used:

Posted in Cell site simulators | Comments Off on InCyberDefense: IMSI Catchers Revive a Heated Debate on Privacy versus Security

The Intercept: Confidential ICE Handbook Lays Out Paths for Investigators to Avoid Constitutional Challenges

The Intercept: Confidential ICE Handbook Lays Out Paths for Investigators to Avoid Constitutional Challenges by Eoin Higgins:

Posted in Immigration arrests | Comments Off on The Intercept: Confidential ICE Handbook Lays Out Paths for Investigators to Avoid Constitutional Challenges

DE: Exclusionary rule does not apply in probation revocation proceedings

Deciding an issue of first impression in the state, the court concludes that the exclusionary rule does not apply in probation revocation proceedings. Surveying law from other states, some recognize a bad faith exception for probation searches, but this case … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Franks doctrine, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on DE: Exclusionary rule does not apply in probation revocation proceedings

M.D.Ala.: Ordering man to crawl out of hotel room before entry was reasonable where officer had arrest warrants for occupant

Defendant was ordered out of a hotel room for officer safety by crawling out. Viewed as a Terry stop, it lacked reasonable suspicion [so why decide it?] but the officers were there with arrest warrants, and that was reasonable under … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Immigration checkpoints | Comments Off on M.D.Ala.: Ordering man to crawl out of hotel room before entry was reasonable where officer had arrest warrants for occupant

E.D.Ky.: Activating a key fob to find the car isn’t a search

Activating a key fob to find the car it belongs to is not a search. “Moreover, the Sixth Circuit has held that ‘[t]he mere insertion of a key into a lock, by an officer who lawfully possesses the key and … Continue reading →

Posted in Search | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Activating a key fob to find the car isn’t a search

E.D.Va.: Arrest at the threshold wasn’t an entry in violation of 4A

Police received a call about drug trafficking, and, when they arrived, they could smell marijuana. That was enough. “Jones unsuccessfully attempts to distinguish between possession of marijuana for commercial activity—i.e., selling it—and possession for personal use.” Officers knocked at the … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Arrest at the threshold wasn’t an entry in violation of 4A

SD: Search incident doctrine doesn’t apply to driver’s urine samples

A urine sample can’t be taken from a suspect incident to an arrest. Nothing about the search incident doctrine of officer safety and destruction of evidence applies to urine samples. State v. Lar, 2018 SD 18, 2018 S.D. LEXIS 26 … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Search incident | Comments Off on SD: Search incident doctrine doesn’t apply to driver’s urine samples

NM: Assuming stop was unconstitutional, def’s giving a false name purged the taint

Surveying the law nationwide, the court concludes that defendant’s giving a false name purged the taint of his unreasonable stop under both the Fourth Amendment and the state constitution. The court declines the invitation to distinguish between violent and non-violent … Continue reading →

Posted in Attenuation | Comments Off on NM: Assuming stop was unconstitutional, def’s giving a false name purged the taint

VA: ABC employee firing for excessive administrative search affirmed

Appellant was a agent of the Virginia ABC who conducted an unreasonable and excessive warrantless search of a licensee’s premises, and he was fired for abuse of authority. He appealed through the state grievance procedure claiming the search was legal, … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on VA: ABC employee firing for excessive administrative search affirmed

LA5: Hearsay on driver’s consent admissible at suppression hearing

The trial court found the stop was reasonable for shooting from a car and driver consented based on the testimony of the stopping officer. Defendant’s claim that the driver’s consent was hearsay and inadmissible was rejected. All other exceptions for … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on LA5: Hearsay on driver’s consent admissible at suppression hearing

GA: Nexus shown where def left house and drove directly to controlled buy

Deleting the detective’s false statement from the affidavit that he had seen a black male with short dreadlocks in an SUV, the affidavit nonetheless provided probable cause to issue the warrant based on a controlled buy from defendant. The remainder … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Nexus, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on GA: Nexus shown where def left house and drove directly to controlled buy

S.D.W.Va.: Post-conviction allegation of inadequate cross examination at suppression hearing didn’t state a sufficient claim

Defendant’s 2255 claim that defense counsel didn’t sufficiently cross-examine the government’s witnesses in the suppression hearing didn’t allege ineffective assistance of counsel. Also, defendant didn’t appeal the denial of the suppression motion and pled guilty instead. Thorne v. United States, … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: Post-conviction allegation of inadequate cross examination at suppression hearing didn’t state a sufficient claim

KS: Waiting to run criminal history check unreasonably extended stop; drug dog used during that time

The stop was unreasonably extended by waiting several minutes to run a criminal history which was not for safety reasons. While the criminal history check was being run, a drug dog was run around the car. The exclusionary rule applies … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on KS: Waiting to run criminal history check unreasonably extended stop; drug dog used during that time

Volokh Conspiracy: Final Pre-Argument Thoughts on the Microsoft Case

Volokh Conspiracy: Final Pre-Argument Thoughts on the Microsoft Case by Orin Kerr: Three thoughts about the briefing in the case ahead of Tuesday’s oral argument.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Volokh Conspiracy: Final Pre-Argument Thoughts on the Microsoft Case

15th anniversary of this blog; 257th anniversary of Otis’ argument in Paxton’s Case

Today is the 15th anniversary of this blog. Today is also the 257th anniversary of James Otis’ 1761 argument at the Boston Old State House against the writs of assistance in Paxton’s Case. Transcripts of the argument are here. (It … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on 15th anniversary of this blog; 257th anniversary of Otis’ argument in Paxton’s Case

Criminal defense lawyers as privacy advocates

Being a criminal defense lawyer is a great privilege and an opportunity. It was obvious to me early in law school 48 years ago that the law of American privacy is made by criminal defense lawyers raising and litigating issues. … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Criminal defense lawyers as privacy advocates

ACLU: New Data Reveals Milwaukee Police Stops Are About Race and Ethnicity

ACLU: New Data Reveals Milwaukee Police Stops Are About Race and Ethnicity by Nusrat Choudhury:

Posted in Pretext | Comments Off on ACLU: New Data Reveals Milwaukee Police Stops Are About Race and Ethnicity