Author Archives: Hall

NJ: Reliability of CI isn’t a question for a bail hearing

“We do not rule on the validity of the search warrant now. But we note that it supports the informant’s veracity by pointing to past instances of reliability, and expressly details what the informant knew of the criminal activity from … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on NJ: Reliability of CI isn’t a question for a bail hearing

MS: A passenger in car 20 min before stop had no standing

Defendant was in the car that was stopped for 20 minutes and admittedly had no possessory interest in the car. Therefore, he had no standing. Nowell v. State, 2018 Miss. App. LEXIS 210 (May 1, 2018). “Williams argues the search … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity, Standing | Comments Off on MS: A passenger in car 20 min before stop had no standing

M.D.Tenn.: While def’s search under “all persons” clause of SW was unreasonable, he was still subject to Terry detenion

A search of defendant under an “all persons” clause in a warrant was unreasonable. Still, however, the officers had reasonable suspicion to detain him. His admission then was that he had a gun, and that led to a frisk. “Giving … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on M.D.Tenn.: While def’s search under “all persons” clause of SW was unreasonable, he was still subject to Terry detenion

WaPo: Va. Supreme Court revives challenge to police storage of license plate reader data

WaPo: Va. Supreme Court revives challenge to police storage of license plate reader data by Tom Jackman:

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on WaPo: Va. Supreme Court revives challenge to police storage of license plate reader data

D.Colo.: Additional DNA sample and fingerprints despite the fact the govt already has it

The court can order an additional DNA sample and fingerprints despite the fact the government already has it. United States v. Lovato, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71592 (D. Colo. Apr. 30, 2018). Collateral estoppel doesn’t apply to a suppression order … Continue reading →

Posted in DNA | Comments Off on D.Colo.: Additional DNA sample and fingerprints despite the fact the govt already has it

MO: Def’s overly nervous behavior, feigning sleep, hiding something, and admission he had a weapon was certainly RS

“The evidence supported a reasonable and particularized suspicion that Defendant was armed, based upon the following behavior exhibited by Defendant: (1) feigning to be asleep; (2) numerous false statements to police; (3) overly nervous demeanor and sweating; (4) flight-like behavior; … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MO: Def’s overly nervous behavior, feigning sleep, hiding something, and admission he had a weapon was certainly RS

PA: Def consented to recordings of jail calls, and this is an exception to the state wiretap statute

The trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law were completely wrong. Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy concerning his jail calls made over a television monitor and through a computer system. This was a case of consent … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Emergency / exigency, Plain view, feel, smell, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on PA: Def consented to recordings of jail calls, and this is an exception to the state wiretap statute

MN: Seizure of blood sample by SW to a hospital doesn’t violate doctor-patient privielge

“The seizure of a patient’s blood sample pursuant to a search warrant addressed to a hospital does not violate the statutory physician-patient privilege because a blood sample collected by the hospital as part of medical treatment does not constitute ‘information’ … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Drug or alcohol testing, Privileges | Comments Off on MN: Seizure of blood sample by SW to a hospital doesn’t violate doctor-patient privielge

E.D.Wis.: Officers’ threat to get SW was real and justified so consent still voluntary

Defendant was arrested at his house, and his wife later consented to entry to seize a gun. The officers’ threat to get a search warrant if she didn’t consent was genuine and there was probable cause to get a search … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Officers’ threat to get SW was real and justified so consent still voluntary

CA11: There is no adverse inference as a matter of law from failure to maintain audio of stop

Because the exclusionary rule is a “last resort,” on plain error review, defendant cannot claim error for the failure of the district court to determine that his version of the facts is more credible than the governments. There is no … Continue reading →

Posted in Body cameras, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on CA11: There is no adverse inference as a matter of law from failure to maintain audio of stop

Volokh Conspiracy: Suspect Can Be Compelled to Decrypt Devices If Government Proves He Has The Ability To Do So, Court Rules

United States v. Spencer, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70649 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 26, 2018) Volokh Conspiracy: Suspect Can Be Compelled to Decrypt Devices If Government Proves He Has The Ability To Do So, Court Rules by Orin Kerr: The right … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on Volokh Conspiracy: Suspect Can Be Compelled to Decrypt Devices If Government Proves He Has The Ability To Do So, Court Rules

Fortune: Police Body Cameras Could Get Facial Recognition Technology

Fortune: Police Body Cameras Could Get Facial Recognition Technology by Lisa Marie Segarra:

Posted in Body cameras, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Fortune: Police Body Cameras Could Get Facial Recognition Technology

AP: Earlier search for Golden State Killer led to wrong man

AP: Earlier search for Golden State Killer led to wrong man by Michael Balsamo and Jonathan J. Cooper with Frank Stoltze:

Posted in DNA, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on AP: Earlier search for Golden State Killer led to wrong man

D.Md.: After 4A claim affirmed on appeal, 2255 isn’t available to litigate the merits

No, the defendant doesn’t get to continue litigating his Fourth Amendment claim into infinity by going to 2255 after loosing the appeal. White v. United States, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70628 (D. Md. Apr. 26, 2018):

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on D.Md.: After 4A claim affirmed on appeal, 2255 isn’t available to litigate the merits

IN: Def slumped over steering wheel in hospital parking lot justified look in car based on emergency aid exception

A deputy sheriff was doing off-duty security work at a hospital same day surgery parking lot when he saw the defendant slumped over his steering wheel, the door open, and the engine off. When the officer turned on his take … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on IN: Def slumped over steering wheel in hospital parking lot justified look in car based on emergency aid exception

AL: There is no REP in a LPN on a vehicle

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in a license plate, and the Fourth Amendment doesn’t prohibit running the tags for any reason. State v. Abrams, 2018 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 24 (Apr. 27, 2018). The government obtained internet routing … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on AL: There is no REP in a LPN on a vehicle

NY4: Def’s actions supported PC for a body SW

Officers executing a search warrant saw defendant acting like he had something hidden in the back of his pants. Defendant’s squirming and clenching his butt strongly suggested to the officer that he had drugs hidden in his rectum. The search … Continue reading →

Posted in Body searches, Burden of pleading | Comments Off on NY4: Def’s actions supported PC for a body SW

PA: “Reason to believe” in Payton and Steagald means probable cause

“Reason to believe” in Payton and Steagald means probable cause. It cannot constitutionally be less and be faithful to the protection of the home from unreasonable invasions. This case includes a thorough discussion of both cases and their constitutional requirements. … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on PA: “Reason to believe” in Payton and Steagald means probable cause

W.D.Va.: Use of a summons under 19 U.S.C. § 1509 to obtain information to prosecute defendant for CP doesn’t violate 4A

The government used a summons under 19 U.S.C. § 1509 to obtain information to prosecute defendant for child pornography. Use of § 1509 didn’t violate the Fourth Amendment, and there’s no exclusionary rule for violation anyway. Defendant’s claim that the … Continue reading →

Posted in Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on W.D.Va.: Use of a summons under 19 U.S.C. § 1509 to obtain information to prosecute defendant for CP doesn’t violate 4A

E.D.Mich.: No PC for nexus to def’s house, and no GFE

The affidavit failed to show probable cause for nexus to defendant’s house. It was so devoid of probable cause that the good faith exception does not apply. United States v. Myles, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69373 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 25, … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: No PC for nexus to def’s house, and no GFE