Author Archives: Hall

NY3: No exigency justified this entry; exclusionary rule applies in NY probation revo proceedings

There was no emergency basis for entry into defendant’s apartment, a probationer. The police understood that another person might be there who they were curious about. Still, there was no justification for the warrantless entry with gun drawn at midnight. … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Exclusionary rule, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on NY3: No exigency justified this entry; exclusionary rule applies in NY probation revo proceedings

CA5: Mass suspicionless strip search of a class of 6th grade girls was clearly unreasonable with a failure to train on policy that would have prevented it

“During a sixth-grade choir class, an assistant principal allegedly ordered a mass, suspicionless strip search of the underwear of twenty-two preteen girls. All agree the search violated the girls’ constitutional rights under Texas and federal law. Even so, the district … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity, Strip search | Comments Off on CA5: Mass suspicionless strip search of a class of 6th grade girls was clearly unreasonable with a failure to train on policy that would have prevented it

D.Md.: Credibility question shown on whether def counsel failed to call material witness at suppression hearing; hearing ordered

Petitioner alleged enough to get a hearing on his 2255 that defense counsel didn’t call a material witness at the suppression hearing that would have created a credibility dispute with the officers as to the nature of the entry. Defense … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.Md.: Credibility question shown on whether def counsel failed to call material witness at suppression hearing; hearing ordered

NYT: How Smart TVs in Millions of U.S. Homes Track More Than What’s on Tonight

NYT: How Smart TVs in Millions of U.S. Homes Track More Than What’s on Tonight by Sapna Maheshwari:

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NYT: How Smart TVs in Millions of U.S. Homes Track More Than What’s on Tonight

E.D.Mich.: By following def and causing him to slow down, the officer created the alleged violation of driving under the minimum speed; stop unreasonable

The DEA asked the Michigan State Police to stop defendant. A trooper followed him and he was driving the speed limit and violating no laws. The officer pulled up next to him to get a look, then slowed to pull … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: By following def and causing him to slow down, the officer created the alleged violation of driving under the minimum speed; stop unreasonable

D.Conn.: Knock-and-announce was complied with, but def also well knew they were there and what for

First, knock and announce was complied with. The officers testified credibly they announced repeatedly as they approached. Second, even if they didn’t, exigency or futility would be an exception–futile because defendant was well aware of their presence. There was also … Continue reading →

Posted in Knock and announce | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Knock-and-announce was complied with, but def also well knew they were there and what for

D.Ariz.: Def on a shuttle bus stopped at I-19 immigration checkpoint consented to search

Defendant was on a shuttle bus referred for secondary inspection at the I-19 immigration checkpoint in Arizona. About 50 come through there a day, and all are stopped and the occupants ordered off. Defendant slipped away and wouldn’t make eye … Continue reading →

Posted in Immigration checkpoints | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: Def on a shuttle bus stopped at I-19 immigration checkpoint consented to search

CA10: A KS child welfare pick-up order was valid on its face in CO and didn’t need to be registered to satisfy 4A

A Kansas court issued a pick-up order for ten children from one family for various allegations. At the time the family was found, they were in Colorado, and the order was executed there. There was no statutory or constitutional duty … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA10: A KS child welfare pick-up order was valid on its face in CO and didn’t need to be registered to satisfy 4A

OH9: ER’s blood draw for medical diagnosis didn’t require compliance with statute on DWI blood draws

Defendant was in a fatal accident and taken to the ER. The state trooper there tried to get him to consent to a blood test, and he declined. While the officer went to get a search warrant for this blood, … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, GPS / Tracking Data | Comments Off on OH9: ER’s blood draw for medical diagnosis didn’t require compliance with statute on DWI blood draws

WI: Drinking and driving until unconsciousness obviates def’s chance to withdraw implied consent

“We conclude that Mitchell voluntarily consented to a blood draw by his conduct of driving on Wisconsin’s roads and drinking to a point evidencing probable cause of intoxication. Further, through drinking to the point of unconsciousness, Mitchell forfeited all opportunity, … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on WI: Drinking and driving until unconsciousness obviates def’s chance to withdraw implied consent

Gizmodo: These Academics Spent the Last Year Testing Whether Your Phone Is Secretly Listening to You

Gizmodo: These Academics Spent the Last Year Testing Whether Your Phone Is Secretly Listening to You by Kashmir Hill (it’s not but apps tracking what you see and seek may make it seem that way):

Posted in Cell phones, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Gizmodo: These Academics Spent the Last Year Testing Whether Your Phone Is Secretly Listening to You

WSJ: How to Protect Your Email Inbox From Snoopers

WSJ (sub. req.): How to Protect Your Email Inbox From Snoopers by Douglas MacMillan: An email inbox is a vault of secrets. In recent years, millions of users have been giving out the combination.

Posted in E-mail | Comments Off on WSJ: How to Protect Your Email Inbox From Snoopers

The Hill: Lawmakers should accept reality that digital communication can never be ‘too secure’

The Hill: Lawmakers should accept reality that digital communication can never be ‘too secure’ by Chris Howell:

Posted in Surveillance technology, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on The Hill: Lawmakers should accept reality that digital communication can never be ‘too secure’

CA4: Carpenter didn’t apply under Davis GFE where circuit law didn’t require warrant before

Carpenter doesn’t apply under Davis good faith exception where circuit law didn’t require a warrant before. Besides, here it was harmless at best. United States v. Chavez, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 18022 (4th Cir. July 2, 2018):

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA4: Carpenter didn’t apply under Davis GFE where circuit law didn’t require warrant before

CA7: Drug court staffers’ making arrests outside courthouse may have violated state law but were reasonable under 4A

In claims against a drug court out of control involving multi-month detentions for really short term ordered incarcerations, there was also a Fourth Amendment claim: Two drug court staffers, one a bailiff with no authority outside the courthouse, undertook to … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA7: Drug court staffers’ making arrests outside courthouse may have violated state law but were reasonable under 4A

CA9: Prior illegal entry into home doesn’t void subsequent SW if observations removed from SW affidavit

Assuming, without deciding, the warrantless entry into defendant’s home was invalid, there still was probable cause for issuance of the search warrant based on the remainder of the affidavit, excising the product of the prior entry. Inclusion of information from … Continue reading →

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Independent source | Comments Off on CA9: Prior illegal entry into home doesn’t void subsequent SW if observations removed from SW affidavit

CA2: A request to Italy to search a computer under MLAT wasn’t governed by 4A

Defendant was accused of computer hacking from Italy, and Italian police conducted a search of his computers there. “Beyond alleging that the search was conducted at the request of the U.S. government, however, Gasperini does not argue that Italian officials … Continue reading →

Posted in Foreign searches | Comments Off on CA2: A request to Italy to search a computer under MLAT wasn’t governed by 4A

D.S.D.: Pole camera surveillance was troubling, but for def being on supervised release with a reduced REP

Pole camera surveillance of defendant may have been intrusive, and the court is sensitive to the ability of a pole camera to invade on privacy, but this case turns on defendant being on supervised release with a lower expectation of … Continue reading →

Posted in Pole cameras, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.S.D.: Pole camera surveillance was troubling, but for def being on supervised release with a reduced REP

MA: There was PC for strip search; alleged violation of strip search policy wasn’t enough to suppress

There was probable cause for defendant’s strip search because everything indicated he had drugs on his person. His “animated” response to the strip search request only added to it, and the officers testified that the crotch area is where suspects … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Strip search | Comments Off on MA: There was PC for strip search; alleged violation of strip search policy wasn’t enough to suppress

M.D.N.C.: Calling def a “suspect” in the affidavit for SW for his house, without more, isn’t PC and the GFE doesn’t apply

Defendant was identified as a “suspect” in a shooting, but the police provided nothing to the issuing magistrate that even suggested how. The affidavit for the search warrant of defendant’s home was “bare bones,” and the good faith exception can’t … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on M.D.N.C.: Calling def a “suspect” in the affidavit for SW for his house, without more, isn’t PC and the GFE doesn’t apply