Author Archives: Hall

OH & MO: Erratic driving justifies stop

Defendant’s stop was justified, and, during the stop, probable cause developed that he was operating under the influence. State v. Dallman, 2018-Ohio-2670, 2018 Ohio App. LEXIS 2890 (12th Dist. July 9, 2018).* Defendant’s erratic driving of swerving within his lane … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH & MO: Erratic driving justifies stop

OH11: Arrest warrant and knowing def home authorized entry to arrest

Officers had an arrest warrant for the defendant and they knew he was home. That was justification to enter. State v. Weaver, 2018-Ohio-2675, 2018 Ohio App. LEXIS 2898 (11th Dist. July 9, 2018). Defendant doesn’t allege any facts that his … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on OH11: Arrest warrant and knowing def home authorized entry to arrest

N.D.Fla.: Def consented to providing pass code to his phone when police seized his phone pending getting SW

“The defendant delivered a package to a post office for mailing. A postal inspector caused the package to be held overnight and then, with the defendant’s consent, opened it. Finding cash and pills that appeared to be illicit, the postal … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Consent | Comments Off on N.D.Fla.: Def consented to providing pass code to his phone when police seized his phone pending getting SW

PA: Def called police about a burglary then consented to entry to investigate

Calling police to a suspected burglary in your own house tells the police to investigate, and then defendant consented to an entry to investigate. Commonwealth v. McCleary, 2018 PA Super 201 (July 10, 2018). Defendant insisted his medical marijuana grow … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on PA: Def called police about a burglary then consented to entry to investigate

TPM: Manafort Loses Fight Over Storage Unit Search In Virginia Case

TPM: Manafort Loses Fight Over Storage Unit Search In Virginia Case by Tierney Sneed (opinion in story):

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent | Comments Off on TPM: Manafort Loses Fight Over Storage Unit Search In Virginia Case

CA9: Def’s 22 minute detention was reasonable because he wouldn’t properly ID himself

Defendant’s 22-minute detention was reasonable because he was lying about who he was, and officers had a right to know. United States v. Thompson, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 18603 (9th Cir. July 9, 2018). Defendant’s vehicle was outside a house … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA9: Def’s 22 minute detention was reasonable because he wouldn’t properly ID himself

CA3: NJ bail reform act doesn’t violate 4A or 8A

New Jersey’s bail reform act which shifts emphasis away from money bail to other restraints and conditions to assure release and return to court does not violate the Fourth Amendment. Not all restraints are unreasonable, given a probable cause finding … Continue reading →

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA3: NJ bail reform act doesn’t violate 4A or 8A

Bloomberg Law: INSIGHT: Cracking Open a Can of Worms: Why Carpenter v. United States May Not Be the Privacy Decision That Was Needed … or Wanted

Bloomberg Law: INSIGHT: Cracking Open a Can of Worms: Why Carpenter v. United States May Not Be the Privacy Decision That Was Needed … or Wanted by Chris Ott

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on Bloomberg Law: INSIGHT: Cracking Open a Can of Worms: Why Carpenter v. United States May Not Be the Privacy Decision That Was Needed … or Wanted

OR: State can’t be compelled to issue SW to Google to help defense case

Defendant was accused of the rape of J. The defense learned that she kept a journal on Google, and the defense sought to get it by subpoena from Google under the Stored Communications Act. There were hearings and the state … Continue reading →

Posted in Stored Communications Act | Comments Off on OR: State can’t be compelled to issue SW to Google to help defense case

D.Minn.: USMJ’s order to disclose all CIs is overbroad; not if they aren’t trial witnesses

The USMJ’s order to disclose all information about the informants was overbroad because it included informant’s who are not trial witnesses. It is limited to those who are trial witnesses. United States v. Bias, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112605 (D. … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Minn.: USMJ’s order to disclose all CIs is overbroad; not if they aren’t trial witnesses

N.D.Cal.: Cell-site simulator requires SW; state law doesn’t permit federal officers to execute state SW

(1) The government’s disclaiming a critical fact in the affidavit for search warrant undermines the probable cause vitiating the warrant. (2) “Use of a cell-site simulator requires a warrant. See United States v. Ellis, 270 F. Supp. 3d 1134, 1141-46 … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site simulators, Warrant execution | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Cell-site simulator requires SW; state law doesn’t permit federal officers to execute state SW

D.Nev.: While def’s firearm was suppressed, it can come in by impeachment if he opens the door at trial

Defendant’s firearm was previously suppressed. If at trial he opens the door to the gun, it can be referred to by proper impeachment. United States v. Casarez, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112536 (D. Nev. July 6, 2018). Defendant was granted … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on D.Nev.: While def’s firearm was suppressed, it can come in by impeachment if he opens the door at trial

WI: SI to arrest warrant issued in error but relied on in good faith would not be suppressed

Police were dispatched to a 911 call, and, on the way, discovered an arrest warrant for the subject of the call. By the time they got there, the 911 call was off, but they arrested on the warrant. It turned … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception | Comments Off on WI: SI to arrest warrant issued in error but relied on in good faith would not be suppressed

NH: CP search warrant for defendant’s phone and laptop completely lacked PC

Defendant was found asleep in his car in a Walmart parking lot with his pants down after having apparently masturbated to adult porn images on his computer or phone. The discussion with the officers gave no reason to believe defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in Private search, Probable cause | Comments Off on NH: CP search warrant for defendant’s phone and laptop completely lacked PC

LA5: Knock-and-talk cannot be used to create exigency

Officers came to defendant’s house because a couple of drug suspects had visited him. The officers’ knock-and-talk didn’t gain them entry into the house, and a knock-and-talk can’t be used to create exigent circumstances. A protective sweep was unjustified because … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Independent source, Knock and talk | Comments Off on LA5: Knock-and-talk cannot be used to create exigency

S.D.N.Y.: Realtime cell phone tracking SW issued with PC

The USPS developed probable cause that defendant was shipping drugs by mail with his own mini mailing service, creating his own mailing labels and having acquired plenty of USPS envelopes and postage to do it. When another suspicious package came … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Mail and packages, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Realtime cell phone tracking SW issued with PC

KS: Guest standing doesn’t require overnight stays to be substantial enough

To have standing to challenge a home search, a guest must show a degree of acceptance into the household or an ongoing and meaningful connection to the host’s residence so that the guest has a reasonable expectation of privacy in … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on KS: Guest standing doesn’t require overnight stays to be substantial enough

D.Ore.: Even if ptf’s 4A violated in stop at Portland airport, exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in § 1983 case

“First, even assuming that Flinn had no lawful basis to stop and talk to Plaintiff in the first place, Plaintiff’s argument is not viable in a § 1983 claim. In a 2016 Ninth Circuit case, the court noted that the … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on D.Ore.: Even if ptf’s 4A violated in stop at Portland airport, exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in § 1983 case

CA9: PC is a close question, and that’s good enough for GFE

“In this case, it is a close question whether the warrant was supported by probable cause. Although a close call, we need not resolve this issue because even if the warrant lacked probable cause, the good faith exception to the … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA9: PC is a close question, and that’s good enough for GFE

Lawfare: When Does a Carpenter Search Start—and When Does It Stop?

Important, thoughtful piece: Lawfare: When Does a Carpenter Search Start—and When Does It Stop? by Orin Kerr:

Posted in Cell site location information, SCOTUS | Comments Off on Lawfare: When Does a Carpenter Search Start—and When Does It Stop?