CA9: Def’s 22 minute detention was reasonable because he wouldn’t properly ID himself

Defendant’s 22-minute detention was reasonable because he was lying about who he was, and officers had a right to know. United States v. Thompson, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 18603 (9th Cir. July 9, 2018).

Defendant’s vehicle was outside a house where a high risk warrant was being served. Officers knew the car was connected to the house because an occupant came out to the car twice during pre-raid surveillance. That was at least reasonable suspicion for further inquiry. United States v. Freeman, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 113459 (W.D. Mo. July 9, 2018).

This entry was posted in Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.