Author Archives: Hall

IN: Order compelling owner of iPhone to unlock it violates 5A self-incrimination; the state is seeking to extract information from her mind

Defendant claimed she’d been sexually assaulted by her boyfriend. In investigating that, it turned into a stalking and harassment investigation of her. The state got a search warrant for her phone. When she wouldn’t unlock it, they sought a court … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Privileges | Comments Off on IN: Order compelling owner of iPhone to unlock it violates 5A self-incrimination; the state is seeking to extract information from her mind

D.Conn.: Warrantless CSLI obtained three years before Carpenter would not be excluded under Davis

Warrantless CSLI obtained three years before Carpenter would not be excluded under Davis. United States v. Blake, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 141895 (D. Conn. Aug. 20, 2018). “Here, Rivarola does not explain what, if anything, further investigation by his prior … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Cell site location information, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Warrantless CSLI obtained three years before Carpenter would not be excluded under Davis

techdirt: Researcher Says Police Body Cameras Are An Insecure Mess

techdirt: Researcher Says Police Body Cameras Are An Insecure Mess by Tim Cushing: The promise of transparency and accountability police body cameras represent hasn’t materialized. Far too often, camera footage goes missing or is withheld from the public for extended … Continue reading →

Posted in Body cameras | Comments Off on techdirt: Researcher Says Police Body Cameras Are An Insecure Mess

VT: NCMEC email search not private search (following CA10)

Defendant’s ISP was not acting as a government agent under the Fourth Amendment when it searched the transmissions defendant sent over its network. It monitored them based on its own business interest, not because it was encouraged to or directed … Continue reading →

Posted in Private search | Comments Off on VT: NCMEC email search not private search (following CA10)

N.D.Ind.: Protective sweep doesn’t require actual knowledge somebody else is inside

The officers conducting a protective sweep do not have to know that there’s somebody else inside. The question is whether it is reasonable on the totality. They can rely on their experience in drug cases, defendant’s priors for drugs, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Protective sweep | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Protective sweep doesn’t require actual knowledge somebody else is inside

CA9: Entry in violation of an order of protection denies def standing

A person on premises in violation of an order of protection, even with an invitation, has no standing to challenge police action there. As long ago as 1979, the Ninth Circuit held it was frivolous for a trespasser to argue … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on CA9: Entry in violation of an order of protection denies def standing

W.D.Ark.: When challenging SW, def has burden of pleading to attach the SW and affidavit to the motion to suppress

When challenging a search warrant, the defendant needs to attach the warrant and affidavit to the motion to suppress. The government did instead. Here, the search warrant wasn’t even needed because there was probable cause for a vehicle search under … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Burden of pleading, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on W.D.Ark.: When challenging SW, def has burden of pleading to attach the SW and affidavit to the motion to suppress

CA5: Franks violation states 4A claim with no qualified immunity

Defendant stated a Fourth Amendment claim for false arrest by a false affidavit for arrest, and the statute of limitations started to run on defendant’s acquittal. A Franks violation generally defeats qualified immunity. Winfrey v. Rogers, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA5: Franks violation states 4A claim with no qualified immunity

S.D.Ind. erroneously states there is a “presumption of good faith reliance” on a SW

Assuming there is no probable cause, the court instead decides the question of application of the good faith exception, erroneously putting the burden on the defendant to overcome the good faith exception, not putting on the government to prove the … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on S.D.Ind. erroneously states there is a “presumption of good faith reliance” on a SW

E.D.Tex.: RS for stop was based on listening to wiretap

Listening live to wiretap, one officer contacted another for a stop based on a drug transaction occurring. This was reasonable suspicion even if there was no reasonable suspicion from a traffic stop. United States v. Jenkins, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Tex.: RS for stop was based on listening to wiretap

TN: DUI checkpoint invalid: No advance warning, no bidirectional stopping, bad planning because traffic backed up right away, didn’t follow procedures

“The State has failed to show that the checkpoint was established and operated in accordance with predetermined operational guidelines or with supervisory authority that minimized the risk of arbitrary intrusion on liberty and limited the officers’ discretion at the scene.” … Continue reading →

Posted in Roadblocks | Comments Off on TN: DUI checkpoint invalid: No advance warning, no bidirectional stopping, bad planning because traffic backed up right away, didn’t follow procedures

Crime Report: Militarized Policing Harms Police Reputation: Study

Crime Report: Militarized Policing Harms Police Reputation: Study by Megan Hadley: The use of Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) teams and other forms of ‘militarized policing’ doesn’t deter violent crime or provide the safety benefits (either to the public or … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on Crime Report: Militarized Policing Harms Police Reputation: Study

CA11: Use of a “sniffer” to locate CP on a computer not mentioned in the SW not unreasonable search

Use of a sniffer device to search defendant’s computers at Emory University was not unreasonable just because the search warrant didn’t mention using it. United States v. Sullivan, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 23315 (11th Cir. Aug. 21, 2018).* Defendant was … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on CA11: Use of a “sniffer” to locate CP on a computer not mentioned in the SW not unreasonable search

CA2: 2011 CSLI seizure by SCA order valid under GFE

Defendant was convicted of international parental kidnapping. CSLI was obtained in 2011 by an order under the SCA without probable cause. The good faith exception applies. United States v. Zodhiates, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 23278 (2d Cir. Aug. 21, 2018):

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA2: 2011 CSLI seizure by SCA order valid under GFE

VT reaffirms state const’l REP in posted open fields

Vermont’s state constitution grants a reasonable expectation of privacy to open fields posted with no trespassing signs. A game warden (vested by state law with all law enforcement powers) violated defendant’s reasonable expectation of privacy by entering upon his posted … Continue reading →

Posted in Open fields, State constitution | Comments Off on VT reaffirms state const’l REP in posted open fields

OH6: Traffic stop led to finding outstanding warrants and led to valid search of car, without even trying to tell us how

Defendant was lawfully stopped for a lane violation. Running his DL led to finding outstanding warrants. “Having ascertained appellant’s identity and outstanding felony warrants, a lawful search led to the discovery of appellant’s unlawful drugs and firearm.” [What was the … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on OH6: Traffic stop led to finding outstanding warrants and led to valid search of car, without even trying to tell us how

KY: SW not invalid because the color of door was wrong; finding gun during search for drugs not unreasonable

“Appellant specifically argues that the warrant was defective because it incorrectly described the front door to his residence as black when, in fact, the door was brown. Appellant’s first name was also misspelled in the warrant. However, neither of these … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity, Plain view, feel, smell, Warrant execution | Comments Off on KY: SW not invalid because the color of door was wrong; finding gun during search for drugs not unreasonable

CA7: Searching wrong apt on ambiguous SW (apt 1 where there were 1A & 1B) gets qualified immunity here

When the officer arrived at plaintiff’s address with a search warrant for apartment 1, he instead found apartments 1A and 1B. The officers attempted to clear up the ambiguity before the search, and they searched 1A finding nothing, and the … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Particularity, Qualified immunity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA7: Searching wrong apt on ambiguous SW (apt 1 where there were 1A & 1B) gets qualified immunity here

N.D.W.Va.: A motion to suppress isn’t moot just because the govt says it won’t use the evidence in its case-in-chief; if it will to impeach, then the issue has to be resolved

Government’s agreeing it wouldn’t use the product of a search in its case in chief does not make it moot unless the government also says it won’t use it in impeachment. Then, it can only be used against the defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Franks doctrine, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on N.D.W.Va.: A motion to suppress isn’t moot just because the govt says it won’t use the evidence in its case-in-chief; if it will to impeach, then the issue has to be resolved

N.D.Cal.: The fact California has legalized recreational marijuana does not make the smell of marijuana in a car no longer PC

The fact California has legalized recreational marijuana for small amounts does not make the smell of marijuana no longer probable cause. Here, there was a strong odor and defendant admitting he was carrying. An ounce or more would be an … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: The fact California has legalized recreational marijuana does not make the smell of marijuana in a car no longer PC