Author Archives: Hall

The Verge: Privacy advocate held at gunpoint after license plate reader mistake, lawsuit alleges

The Verge: Privacy advocate held at gunpoint after license plate reader mistake, lawsuit alleges by Colin Lecher:

Posted in Surveillance technology, Uncategorized | Comments Off on The Verge: Privacy advocate held at gunpoint after license plate reader mistake, lawsuit alleges

CA11: When information in a SW affidavit comes from an illegal source, it is purged; here, PC remains

Excising that which was allegedly illegally obtained from the affidavit for this search warrant, probable cause still remains. United States v. Fleur, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 4899 (11th Cir. Feb. 20, 2019). There was no independent probable cause for the … Continue reading →

Posted in Independent source, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA11: When information in a SW affidavit comes from an illegal source, it is purged; here, PC remains

Not too bright to use one’s military work computer to plan domestic terrorism

NYTimes: Coast Guard Officer Plotted to Kill Democrats and Journalists, Prosecutors Say:

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on Not too bright to use one’s military work computer to plan domestic terrorism

D.D.C.: SEC subpoena aiding Israel securities dept is overbroad and must be narrowed

Waymack is a doctor in the U.S. who also has business in Israel. Israel sought assistance from the SEC under an international MOU for a securities investigation there. Waymack has a Fifth Amendment privilege to not provide information in the … Continue reading →

Posted in Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on D.D.C.: SEC subpoena aiding Israel securities dept is overbroad and must be narrowed

N.D.Ga.: No nexus shown for Facebook SW, but GFE applied

The District Court disagrees with the USMJ that there was probable cause and nexus for a search warrant for defendant’s Facebook page. But, reasonable judges disagree, and that is enough for the court to conclude that the good faith exception … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus, Social media warrants | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: No nexus shown for Facebook SW, but GFE applied

W.D.Wash.: 14 month delay in searching seized cell phone was reasonable because it wouldn’t have been returned anyway

A 14 month delay between seizure and search of defendant’s cell phone was not unreasonable because the phone would not have been returned to defendant in any event. Plus, he was in jail and couldn’t possess it. United States v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Informant hearsay, Motion to suppress, Reasonableness | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: 14 month delay in searching seized cell phone was reasonable because it wouldn’t have been returned anyway

SCOTUS: The excessive fines clause of the 8A applies to the states via 14A as to in rem forfeitures

Timbs v. Indiana, 2019 U.S. LEXIS 1350 (Feb. 20, 2019). Syllabus:

Posted in Forfeiture | Comments Off on SCOTUS: The excessive fines clause of the 8A applies to the states via 14A as to in rem forfeitures

Reason.com: How the Feds Are Using Civil Asset Forfeiture to Threaten Free Speech

Reason.com: How the Feds Are Using Civil Asset Forfeiture to Threaten Free Speech by Elizabeth Nolan Brown: Sex, publishing, and quasi-legal theft collide in the Backpage prosecution. Prosecutors are ignoring the Constitution and legal precedent in their zeal to punish … Continue reading →

Posted in Forfeiture | Comments Off on Reason.com: How the Feds Are Using Civil Asset Forfeiture to Threaten Free Speech

W.D.La.: USPS website usage records are third-party records, and def had no REP in them

The government had digital evidence that defendant tracked a package on the USPS. His motion to suppress this third-party evidence is denied. First, anybody could track a package on the USPS website if they had the tracking number, and, second, … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on W.D.La.: USPS website usage records are third-party records, and def had no REP in them

D.Neb.: Initial entry into hotel room was unlawful, but affidavit for SW showed PC before that happened, and SW not suppressed

Even though the officer’s entry into the hotel room was unlawful, the officer had probable cause before that. So, even ignoring the observations in the room, the warrant will not be suppressed. United States v. Sandoval, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Independent source | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Initial entry into hotel room was unlawful, but affidavit for SW showed PC before that happened, and SW not suppressed

Three on ineffective assistance claims

There’s no reasonable probability defense counsel was ineffective for not filing a motion to suppress defendant’s BAC because it wouldn’t have been granted. State v. Olsen, 2019-Ohio-568, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 588 (2d Dist. Feb. 15, 2019),* Petitioner’s ineffective assistance … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on Three on ineffective assistance claims

GA: State privilege against self-incrimination prevents the state from using refusal to submit to a BAC test at trial

Under the Georgia constitution, the state privilege against self-incrimination prevents the state from using refusal to submit to a BAC test against the accused in a DUI trial. Elliott v. State, 2019 Ga. LEXIS 112 (Feb, 18, 2019). This search … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Privileges | Comments Off on GA: State privilege against self-incrimination prevents the state from using refusal to submit to a BAC test at trial

CA5: Ptf’s indictment by a Texas grand jury cuts off his malicious prosecution claim

Plaintiff’s indictment by a Texas grand jury cuts off his malicious prosecution claim. There was no evidence the grand jury was misled. Curtis v. Sowell, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 4666 (5th Cir. Feb. 15, 2019). Defendant was encountered by police … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA5: Ptf’s indictment by a Texas grand jury cuts off his malicious prosecution claim

D.D.C.: Knotted plastic bag of drugs in waistband was in plain view

Defendant was stopped for a traffic offense, and his tinted windows were way too dark and the officer couldn’t see inside. Defendant was told to lower the window, and he did. The officer could immediately see a knotted plastic bag … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Knotted plastic bag of drugs in waistband was in plain view

CA6: Knock-and-talk on curtilage was permitted

Officers came to plaintiff’s home for a knock-and-talk, and he went out the back with a gun in hand. One officer pursued him, and he ended up racking and pointing the gun and getting shot. The officers get qualified immunity … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Knock and talk, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: Knock-and-talk on curtilage was permitted

OH7: Def’s one phone call from station house was on a recorded phone with a sign it was; no REP

Defendant was just arrested, and he was given his one phone call before going to jail. The call was recorded, and the sign on the wall said it was. He had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the call. State … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on OH7: Def’s one phone call from station house was on a recorded phone with a sign it was; no REP

D.Conn.: No REP in airplane and contents by absent co-conspirator who claimed ownership

There was a “ramp check” authorized by FAA regulation of a private plane at an airport in Connecticut, essentially a traffic stop. It was admitted that a small quantity of marijuana was on the plane. The automobile exception applies to … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on D.Conn.: No REP in airplane and contents by absent co-conspirator who claimed ownership

CA6: No successor 2255 for Carpenter

Petitioner seeks a 2255 successor habeas petition based on Carpenter. It’s denied because: It’s not newly discovered, and it wouldn’t even apply because of the good faith exception. In re Gipson, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 4457 (6th Cir. Feb. 14, … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA6: No successor 2255 for Carpenter

S.D.N.Y.: Protective sweep was invalid, and SW predicated on it is suppressed

The government’s assertion of need for protective sweep was belied by the delay in getting around to conducting it. The product of the protective sweep made it into the search warrant application, and the product of the warrant is suppressed. … Continue reading →

Posted in Protective sweep | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Protective sweep was invalid, and SW predicated on it is suppressed

WA: Breath test was valid as search incident

A breath test conducted under the implied consent law is a valid search incident to arrest. The state constitution does not impose a higher standard. State v. Nelson, 2019 Wash. App. LEXIS 354 (Feb. 14, 2019). Defendant didn’t raise a … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Drug or alcohol testing, Good faith exception | Comments Off on WA: Breath test was valid as search incident