Author Archives: Hall

CA11: 4A IAC claim fails on merits of search issue

Petitioner’s IAC claim against defense counsel for not pursuing a Fourth Amendment claim was properly denied for lack of standing on the merits. Virgil v. Sec’y, Dept. of Corrections, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 23777 (11th Cir. Aug. 8, 2019).* Defendant’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA11: 4A IAC claim fails on merits of search issue

MD: Def’s alleged furtive movement while sitting in car wasn’t significant enough to show he was concealing a gun

Defendant’s “furtive movement” in the car while talking to the police officer outside the car wasn’t significant enough in the testimony to show that he was secreting something or moving around a weapon. There thus was no objective basis for … Continue reading →

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on MD: Def’s alleged furtive movement while sitting in car wasn’t significant enough to show he was concealing a gun

CA9: Standing shown to sue Facebook under Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act

Plaintiffs stated Art. III standing to bring a class action against Facebook for violation of the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act. Patel v. Facebook, Inc., 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 23673 (9th Cir. Aug. 8, 2019).* Summary by the court:

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on CA9: Standing shown to sue Facebook under Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act

CA11: No REP in last four digits of SSN voluntarily disclosed to agency

“The district court did not err in dismissing Hollis’s right to privacy claims. Because Hollis voluntarily provided Defendants with the last four digits of his SSN, he abandoned a reasonable expectation of privacy in those digits. Miller, 425 U.S. at … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA11: No REP in last four digits of SSN voluntarily disclosed to agency

WA: Pre-Carpenter subpoena for CSLI fails with no PC showing

Defendant’s CSLI records were obtained by subpoena without a search warrant pre-Carpenter, and the record was preserved. The Fourth Amendment and the state constitution were violated. The state just can’t use a subpoena for something this intrusive that tracks one’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information | Comments Off on WA: Pre-Carpenter subpoena for CSLI fails with no PC showing

IN: Failure to prove dept’l inventory policy fatal to inventory search; officer calling search one thing but DA not arguing it is waiver

The state didn’t support the departmental inventory policy at trial, and that was error. Also, what the officer calls a search (here “search incident”) the prosecutor didn’t, and that argument was waived for appeal. Smith v. State, 2019 Ind. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Inventory | Comments Off on IN: Failure to prove dept’l inventory policy fatal to inventory search; officer calling search one thing but DA not arguing it is waiver

WA: EMTs would be medicating and intubating def in transit after car wreck, and that’s exigency for warrantless blood draw

Defendant was in a bad wreck and the first responders could smell alcohol. He was going to be medicated and intubated for transport to the ER. A warrantless blood draw was reasonable for exigent circumstances because the sample would have … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on WA: EMTs would be medicating and intubating def in transit after car wreck, and that’s exigency for warrantless blood draw

D.D.C.: Evidence at the detention hearing supports PC for a DNA test for defendant

Defendant was indicted and then the government sought a DNA test to connect him to the case. Based on the detention hearing, evidence showed “(1) links the defendant’s gun to the murder weapon; (2) connects scented oil vials found at … Continue reading →

Posted in DNA | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Evidence at the detention hearing supports PC for a DNA test for defendant

NYT: Opinion: How Bodycams Distort Real Life

NYT: Opinion: How Bodycams Distort Real Life by Albert Fox Cahn: New technologies have side effects that aren’t fully understood until the technology is in wide use.

Posted in Body cameras | Comments Off on NYT: Opinion: How Bodycams Distort Real Life

VT: Flagging down def in driveway while officer on welfare check call was consensual stop; led to DUI arrest

A state trooper went to defendant’s house for a welfare check on a person, and pulled in the driveway and started toward the house. A car was coming down the driveway and he waved for the car to stop so … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on VT: Flagging down def in driveway while officer on welfare check call was consensual stop; led to DUI arrest

S.D.Ga.: Suspicionless probation search condition doesn’t need to be part of the sentencing order to be valid

Defendant was properly subject to a suspicionless state probation condition. He had no right to have it announced in court as a part of the sentence. It occurs by operation of law. United States v. Linder, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: Suspicionless probation search condition doesn’t need to be part of the sentencing order to be valid

M.D.Pa.: Dog alert satisfied CA3 standards because it was to specific place

The search of defendant’s U-Haul truck was justified by a dog alert. “Assuming arguendo that Third Circuit precedent supported defendants’ more taxing standard for what constitutes a positive and reliable alert, Trooper Hoy still had probable cause to search the … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, GPS / Tracking Data | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Dog alert satisfied CA3 standards because it was to specific place

VA: 4A claim waived for failure to fully brief it

Defendant’s Fourth Amendment claim on appeal was waived by failure to fully argue it, as in “Fourth Amendment rights were violated because ….” Ducharme v. Commonwealth, 2019 Va. App. LEXIS 187 (Aug. 6, 2019):

Posted in Standards of review | Comments Off on VA: 4A claim waived for failure to fully brief it

OH10: Def’s stop turned from consensual to a seizure when the officer saw a baggie of drugs in his hand

Defendant and another were encountered by police after coming out of a drug house. The encounter was consensual until defendant tried to walk away, but the officer had already seen a baggie of drugs in his hand by plain view. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Plain view, feel, smell, Standing | Comments Off on OH10: Def’s stop turned from consensual to a seizure when the officer saw a baggie of drugs in his hand

CA11: Second successor 2255 denied as already decided or having no merit

Defendant attempts a second successor 2255 raising essentially the same issues, including a Fourth Amendment claim, which has already been litigated. He can’t show that this claim has any potential merit for a successor petition or wasn’t already decided. In … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA11: Second successor 2255 denied as already decided or having no merit

N.D.Ala.: Court describes a protective sweep as a search incident to arrest and leaves confusion

Defendant was arrested on his porch, but one could see the bedroom from there. Officers did not have a search warrant. He requested an officer to turn off the stove. A protective sweep of the bedroom was valid. “Deputy Thomas … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Protective sweep, Search incident | Comments Off on N.D.Ala.: Court describes a protective sweep as a search incident to arrest and leaves confusion

OH9: Citizen informant’s 911 call properly admitted at suppression hearing even though hearsay

A 911 call from a citizen informant was properly admitted into evidence becuase hearsay is admissible in suppression hearings. There was a factual basis for defendant’s stop on reasonable suspicion for DUI. The CI’s report was that he was too … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on OH9: Citizen informant’s 911 call properly admitted at suppression hearing even though hearsay

Motherboard: Ring doorbell cameras and the police

Motherboard (Vice): Revealed: The Secret Scripts Amazon Give to Cops to Promote Ring Surveillance Cameras by Caroline Haskins:

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Motherboard: Ring doorbell cameras and the police

E.D.N.Y.: Violation of NYC bicycle ordinance and evasiveness justified arrest and search incident

Violation of the NYC bicycle use ordinance justifies arrest if necessary, and defendant was riding his bike on the sidewalk. “Here, the officers’ search of Defendant was incident to the lawful stop of Defendant for a bicycle traffic infraction, that … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Search incident | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Violation of NYC bicycle ordinance and evasiveness justified arrest and search incident

W.D.Wash.: Photographing the naked body of unconscious Taser victim in the hospital stated a claim and overcame QI

Plaintiff was unconscious in the hospital when the defendants manipulated her naked body to photograph Taser marks. She stated a claim under a 1963 Ninth Circuit case that overcame qualified immunity. Young v. Pena, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 131641 (W.D. … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Body searches, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: Photographing the naked body of unconscious Taser victim in the hospital stated a claim and overcame QI