N.D.Ala.: Court describes a protective sweep as a search incident to arrest and leaves confusion

Defendant was arrested on his porch, but one could see the bedroom from there. Officers did not have a search warrant. He requested an officer to turn off the stove. A protective sweep of the bedroom was valid. “Deputy Thomas observed a weapon in plain view in an open closet area in the bedroom.” The search was valid, and it is described as incident to the arrest. United States v. Whitehead, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 131349 (N.D. Ala. Aug. 6, 2019).* [If the closet was searched, it is invalid as a search incident to arrest. If the gun were visible in a walk through looking for people, then seizure of the gun would be valid in the protective sweep. The opinion is confusing, uses “search incident” and doesn’t tell us exactly what happened.]

This entry was posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Protective sweep, Search incident. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.