Author Archives: Hall

CA9: Taking too long to get SW for phone violated clearly established law

The officer here violated clearly established law by taking too long to apply for a warrant to search plaintiff’s cell phone. Plaintiff promptly sought its return, but that was denied because the officer hadn’t got a warrant yet. Langham v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA9: Taking too long to get SW for phone violated clearly established law

PA: Officer can’t impound a car just to avoid state automobile exception

Pennsylvania’s automobile exception is more stringent than the Fourth Amendment requiring exigency. The state can’t end run a refusal to consent by impounding a car to get into it. Commonwealth v. Rosario, 2025 PA Super 286 (Dec. 23, 2025). “First, … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on PA: Officer can’t impound a car just to avoid state automobile exception

MN: GFE does not apply to after search changes in law that were obviously coming

“The good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule does not apply to a warrantless vehicle search based solely on the smell of marijuana that occurred before we issued our opinion in State v. Torgerson, 995 N.W.2d 164 (Minn. 2023), which held … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Nexus, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on MN: GFE does not apply to after search changes in law that were obviously coming

SCOTUS: Kavanaugh says immigration stops still require RS

Trump v. Illinois, 2025 U.S. LEXIS 4766 (U.S. Dec. 23, 2025), involving the President calling up the National Guard in Illinois, the government failed to prove an exception to the Posse Comitatus Act. [At first, I elected to omit this, … Continue reading →

Posted in immigration stops, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on SCOTUS: Kavanaugh says immigration stops still require RS

IN: Failure to execute social media warrant in 10 days per statute did not require suppression where PC still existed

The search warrant on defendant’s social media accounts took longer to be executed than the ten days state statute provided for, but that wasn’t reason to exclude the product of the search. Despite the statutory violation, the real question is … Continue reading →

Posted in Social media warrants, Staleness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on IN: Failure to execute social media warrant in 10 days per statute did not require suppression where PC still existed

D.Minn.: No duty for officer to resolve traffic stop questions before safety concerns resolved

“All of these questions lasted fewer than thirty seconds–they did not ‘measurably extend’ the stop. Johnson, 555 U.S. at 333. Ali cites no law that suggests that officers must address the traffic infraction before they may ask questions related to … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Nexus, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.Minn.: No duty for officer to resolve traffic stop questions before safety concerns resolved

D.D.C.: Comey attorney-computer search redux

In the Comey attorney-client privileged search, the government was ordered to return the evidence, not destroy it. Another alternative is to deposit it with the court subject to another search warrant, if the government can get one. Richman v. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Comey attorney-computer search redux

TX2: Taking car keys doesn’t make an investigative detention a custodial arrest

“[A]n officer’s confiscation of a suspect’s keys during an investigative detention does not automatically escalate the stop into a custodial arrest.” Here, it was a DUI stop and taking the keys was for safety reasons. Bwondara v. State, 2025 Tex. … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell site location information | Comments Off on TX2: Taking car keys doesn’t make an investigative detention a custodial arrest

NY Kings Co.: Def had a REP in his space in a homeless shelter

Defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy in his space in a homeless shelter against a warrantless entry. People v. Maquila, 2025 NY Slip Op 25270, 2025 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 9887 (Kings Co. Dec. 17, 2025):

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on NY Kings Co.: Def had a REP in his space in a homeless shelter

CA6: Offer of proof required on missing suppression hearing witness for IAC claim

When claiming a witness wasn’t called at a suppression hearing as an ineffective assistance claim, there has to be an offer of proof as to what the witness would have testified to with a showing of how it would affect … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA6: Offer of proof required on missing suppression hearing witness for IAC claim

CA6: Reference to water emoji 💦with dual meaning not a Franks violation

“Swanagan did not make an adequate preliminary showing that Budde’s interpretation of the water emoji was intentionally or recklessly false, so the district court did not clearly err in finding the affidavit truthful. Swanagan asserts that he ‘provided dictionary support … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on CA6: Reference to water emoji 💦with dual meaning not a Franks violation

WaPo: Your chatbot keeps a file on you. Here’s how to delete it.

WaPo: Your chatbot keeps a file on you. Here’s how to delete it. by Geoffrey A. Fowler (“A clickable guide to fixing the complicated privacy settings from ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot, Gemini and Meta AI. … Try this: Log in to … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Social media warrants | Comments Off on WaPo: Your chatbot keeps a file on you. Here’s how to delete it.

The Sixth Edition is now on Lexis

Books to ship soon, if not already. I just noticed today.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on The Sixth Edition is now on Lexis

Rolling Stone: Trump’s DNA Dragnet: The Law That Turns Us All Into Suspects

Rolling Stone: Trump’s DNA Dragnet: The Law That Turns Us All Into Suspects by Alex Ashley (“A little-used federal law is being activated in ways that could turn immigration screening into the backbone of a far-reaching DNA surveillance system.”)

Posted in DNA | Comments Off on Rolling Stone: Trump’s DNA Dragnet: The Law That Turns Us All Into Suspects

CA6: Student not entitled to warning before school search

The search of this student was reasonable, and the student had no right to be warned before it was going to happen. Halasz v. Cass City Pub. Sch., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 33093 (6th Cir. Dec. 18, 2025). There was … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, School searches | Comments Off on CA6: Student not entitled to warning before school search

OH2: Failure to call first officer in collective knowledge not error where second officer’s own observations sufficient

The state failed to call the first officer reporting defendant to the second under the collective knowledge doctrine, but that didn’t result in a reversible denial of confrontation. The second officer’s own observations supported it. State v. Simon, 2025-Ohio-5660 (2d … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Collective knowledge, Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on OH2: Failure to call first officer in collective knowledge not error where second officer’s own observations sufficient

MA: Overly long GPS monitoring as a condition of probation can be 4A unreasonable

“Whether GPS monitoring as a condition of probation is a reasonable search turns in part on its duration, and the Commonwealth bears the burden of demonstrating that GPS monitoring is reasonable for the entire ordered duration. Notwithstanding the requirement in … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, GPS / Tracking Data, Particularity, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on MA: Overly long GPS monitoring as a condition of probation can be 4A unreasonable

N.-M.Ct.Crim.App.: Joint investigation by Belgium and Navy in NATO forces of murder of service member’s spouse by the service member was not improper

Defendant was in the Navy with NATO forces and questioned by Belgian authorities under their law for murder of his wife. This was not an improper joint investigation because both Belgium and the United States had jurisdiction over his crime. … Continue reading →

Posted in Foreign searches, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.-M.Ct.Crim.App.: Joint investigation by Belgium and Navy in NATO forces of murder of service member’s spouse by the service member was not improper

D.Minn.: Taking 10 minutes to review a SW affidavit doesn’t show magistrate not neutral and detached

The issuing judge taking ten minutes to review an affidavit for warrant does not show that he or she abandoned the role of a neutral and detached magistrate. [I can usually see probable cause in an affidavit in 30-45 seconds. … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Neutral and detached magistrate, Protective sweep, Waiver | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Taking 10 minutes to review a SW affidavit doesn’t show magistrate not neutral and detached

NC: No standing in someone else’s cell phone pinged to find defendant

Defendant used someone else’s cell phone and officers pinged it to find him. He had no standing for the borrowed phone. After arrest, he admitted the shooting in a jail call. “Defendant’s temporary use of the phone does not automatically … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on NC: No standing in someone else’s cell phone pinged to find defendant