Author Archives: Hall

NY1: Ptf stated claim for unreasonable strip search at stationhouse for a misdemeanor

Plaintiff states a claim for a visual strip in a stationhouse search forbidden for a misdemeanor. There are fact questions for trial as to what the officers knew about alleged possession of contraband. Beauvoir v City of New York, 2019 … Continue reading →

Posted in Strip search | Comments Off on NY1: Ptf stated claim for unreasonable strip search at stationhouse for a misdemeanor

W.D.Okla.: Def’s on-again off-again relationship with decedent didn’t give him standing in a search of her premises when they were off-again; he had no key

“Though Defendant may have had an ‘ongoing and meaningful connection to [Zotigh’s] home as a social guest’ at certain times prior to the searches, Zotigh’s termination of their relationship, her refusal to allow Defendant to stay in her mobile home … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.Okla.: Def’s on-again off-again relationship with decedent didn’t give him standing in a search of her premises when they were off-again; he had no key

Justice Department takes another run at encryption backdoors with ‘lawful access’

CSO: Justice Department takes another run at encryption backdoors with ‘lawful access’ by Cynthia Brumfield (“Law enforcement officials and experts on the distribution of child pornography gathered on Friday to make the emotional, if not technological, case that tech companies … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Justice Department takes another run at encryption backdoors with ‘lawful access’

ACLU Blog: Rapid DNA Machines in Police Departments Need Regulation

ACLU Blog: Rapid DNA Machines in Police Departments Need Regulation Vera Eidelman & Jay Stanley (“Police departments around the country are beginning to deploy ‘Rapid DNA’ machines, which can take a cheek swab or other genetic sample and automatically generate … Continue reading →

Posted in DNA | Comments Off on ACLU Blog: Rapid DNA Machines in Police Departments Need Regulation

Legal Intelligencer: Commentary: What Is a Reasonable Expectation of Privacy in the Digital World? Part II

Legal Intelligencer: Commentary: What Is a Reasonable Expectation of Privacy in the Digital World? Part II by Leonard Deutchman (“In last week’s article, I discussed the findings of the Pennsylvania Superior Court’s nonprecedential decision in Commonwealth v. Mason, in which … Continue reading →

Posted in Digital privacy, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Legal Intelligencer: Commentary: What Is a Reasonable Expectation of Privacy in the Digital World? Part II

CO: Authentication of SW production from Dropbox not self-authenticating as exhibit

Production of records of documents from a Dropbox account by search warrant is not the same as records from a social media account that are more likely to be self- or nearly self-authenticating. Officers can attempt to authenticate the latter, … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on CO: Authentication of SW production from Dropbox not self-authenticating as exhibit

CA5: USMJ didn’t need to be told in SW application that the computer was small and portable; that’s usually obvious

Six months was not too stale in a child pornography case where the court has approved much longer delays. “The magistrate judge did not need to be told that electronic devices are often small and portable or that they might … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Staleness | Comments Off on CA5: USMJ didn’t need to be told in SW application that the computer was small and portable; that’s usually obvious

Cal.4: Because CA recognizes recreational MJ, possession of a small amount on the person isn’t probable cause to search the car

Because of recreational marijuana in California, hardly any weight can be attached to possession of a small quantity on a person in a car. People v. Lee, 2019 Cal. App. LEXIS 964 (4th Dist. Oct. 3, 2019):

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on Cal.4: Because CA recognizes recreational MJ, possession of a small amount on the person isn’t probable cause to search the car

W.D.N.C.: SWs are against a “place to be searched” and name of occupant not a const’l requirement

Search warrants are against the place not the person, and there is no constitutional requirement that the search warrant also name the occupant to be particular. In addition, the good faith exception applies here. United States v. Martin, 2019 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: SWs are against a “place to be searched” and name of occupant not a const’l requirement

MA: Traffic stop “morphed” into arrest for no DL, inventory, then automobile exception

Driving on a suspended license is an offense for which (1) search incident is valid, and (2) the driver can’t continue and the vehicle would be impounded and subject to a proper inventory. In this case, the inventory was not … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Inventory | Comments Off on MA: Traffic stop “morphed” into arrest for no DL, inventory, then automobile exception

Two on Franks on post-conviction failing for no proper showing

Defendant on 2255 can’t show that defense counsel was ineffective for not filing a Franks challenge. He can’t make either a “substantial preliminary showing” or show prejudice because it would fail on the merits if made. Vanderbeck v. United States, … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on Two on Franks on post-conviction failing for no proper showing

techdirt: Documents Show The FBI Is Targeting Financial Institutions, Credit Reporting Agencies, And Universities With NSLs

techdirt: Documents Show The FBI Is Targeting Financial Institutions, Credit Reporting Agencies, And Universities With NSLs by Tim Cushing (“We’ve written several times before about the FBI and its unnatural love for National Security Letters. NSLs make the FBI tick. … Continue reading →

Posted in Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on techdirt: Documents Show The FBI Is Targeting Financial Institutions, Credit Reporting Agencies, And Universities With NSLs

Forbes: Facial Recognition: A Force For Good … Or Government?

Forbes: Facial Recognition: A Force For Good … Or Government? by Jon Markman (“The world is on the cusp of a massive $12.3 trillion 5G explosion. Former Verizon CEO, Lowell McAdam, says 5G ‘will usher in the Fourth Industrial Revolution … Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Forbes: Facial Recognition: A Force For Good … Or Government?

E.D.Mich.: Giving password to computer and Facebook account waived REP as to that person

Defendant gave his passwords to his computer and Facebook to his victim. Her searches are not Fourth Amendment violations. United States v. Johnson, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 169622 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 1, 2019). The state’s admission on appeal that they … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Social media warrants | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Giving password to computer and Facebook account waived REP as to that person

D.Neb.: Violation of an ATF regulation during administrative search of an FFL doesn’t justify suppression without a 4A violation

Defendant had a federal firearms dealer license and he was subjected to an inspection. Firearms dealers, of course, are closely regulated businesses. After the motion to suppress was denied, he decided that ATF regulations were violated. The court concludes, based … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Cell phones, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Violation of an ATF regulation during administrative search of an FFL doesn’t justify suppression without a 4A violation

D.Nev.: Govt’s stated intent to forfeit requires motion for return of property be denied

Motion for return of property seized five weeks ago is denied. The government will image electronics and return them. That which is subject to forfeiture has to await it. United States v. Wells, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168017 (D. Nev. … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Govt’s stated intent to forfeit requires motion for return of property be denied

D.Conn.: Def counsel’s memo to his own file regarding why 4A claim wasn’t further pursued was admissible in 2255 to show strategic basis

Defense counsel’s memo to his own file about his choice not to further pursue a GPS tracking issue that was fully litigated in a hearing was admissible in the 2255 to show the reasonable strategic basis for the decision. Corbett … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Def counsel’s memo to his own file regarding why 4A claim wasn’t further pursued was admissible in 2255 to show strategic basis

E.D.La.: Alleged mistreatment during SW execution doesn’t overcome overwhelming facts of guilt

Defendant’s alleged mistreatment during the execution of the search warrant, which was only vaguely described in the opinion, even if provable, wouldn’t overcome the overwhelming proof of guilt. Here it was raised as an IAC claim. United States v. Puente, … Continue reading →

Posted in Collective knowledge, Ineffective assistance, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.La.: Alleged mistreatment during SW execution doesn’t overcome overwhelming facts of guilt

W.D.Pa.: 4A doesn’t require closer questioning of one claiming a serious emergency that proved to be false

Officers responded to a 911 call that six shotgun toting men broke into a house. They talked to the caller at the scene. The front door was open. They knocked and announced and entered. Doing a protective sweep of the … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Protective sweep | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: 4A doesn’t require closer questioning of one claiming a serious emergency that proved to be false

CA2 applies GFE even though not litigated below because the findings on PC show it

A second search warrant was issued for defendant’s cell phone. He argued lack of probable cause and the government responded. The government didn’t raise the good faith exception in the district court. The court assumes lack of probable cause and … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA2 applies GFE even though not litigated below because the findings on PC show it