Two on Franks on post-conviction failing for no proper showing

Defendant on 2255 can’t show that defense counsel was ineffective for not filing a Franks challenge. He can’t make either a “substantial preliminary showing” or show prejudice because it would fail on the merits if made. Vanderbeck v. United States, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 171347 (D. N.J. Oct. 1, 2019).*

Defendant failed to show defense counsel was ineffective for not challenging the search warrant for his BAC because he doesn’t show what was false or that the conviction depended solely on that. State v. Sow, 2019-Ohio-4028, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 4134 (1st Dist. Oct. 1, 2019).*

This entry was posted in Franks doctrine. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.