Author Archives: Hall

NYTimes: Have a Search Warrant for Data? Google Wants You to Pay

NYTimes: Have a Search Warrant for Data? Google Wants You to Pay by Gabriel J.X. Dance and Jennifer Valentino-DeVries (“The tech giant has begun charging U.S. law enforcement for responses to search warrants and subpoenas.”): Facing an increasing number of … Continue reading →

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on NYTimes: Have a Search Warrant for Data? Google Wants You to Pay

OH8: Seat belt ordinance permissible under police power

A seat belt ordinance (as well as state law on the subject) is a proper exercise of police power for which a traffic stop may occur when an officer sees an occupant without a seat belt on. City of South … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity | Comments Off on OH8: Seat belt ordinance permissible under police power

CA10: NM metropolitan courts can issue SWs; they’re not governed by Rule 41, just the 4A

The New Mexico metropolitan court had jurisdiction to issue search warrants even though it had no general jurisdiction over felony cases. A state issued search warrant doesn’t need to comply with Rule 41; it only need comply with the Fourth … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on CA10: NM metropolitan courts can issue SWs; they’re not governed by Rule 41, just the 4A

M.D.La.: Merely being a CI doesn’t make the CI a “participant” in the crime for disclosure

Merely being a CI for the police doesn’t make the CI a participant in the crime to make his or her identity subject to disclosure. United States v. Westbrook, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10563 (M.D. La. Jan. 22, 2020). The … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on M.D.La.: Merely being a CI doesn’t make the CI a “participant” in the crime for disclosure

Iowa’s cases from Thursday

There was probable cause based on the dashcam video for defendant’s stop for not having two functioning headlights. “Here, what the video evidence shows is unquestionably open to interpretation as to whether the headlight was inoperable or just dim. Whatever … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Iowa’s cases from Thursday

CA7: Ptf’s suit for arrest for possession and obstruction was barred by arguable PC

Plaintiff was arrested for possession of cocaine and obstructing justice when he allegedly swallowed the baggie of drugs. He was taken to a hospital and drank charcoal and other liquids to pass it and he was x-rayed. Nothing was recovered. … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Collective knowledge, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA7: Ptf’s suit for arrest for possession and obstruction was barred by arguable PC

W.D.Ky.: An open container doesn’t permit a search of an entire car under automobile exception or search incident

An open container in a car doesn’t grant the police the authority to search the entire vehicle for another open container. It is implausible to believe that another would be found outside of the passenger compartment. United States v. Thomas, … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Search incident | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: An open container doesn’t permit a search of an entire car under automobile exception or search incident

CA9: Vacated and dismissed case on post-conviction doesn’t invoke Heck bar

Three men convicted in Alaska state court got their convictions vacated and dismissed when someone else confessed to the crime. The lack of a criminal judgment rendered the Heck bar inapplicable. Roberts v. City of Fairbanks, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Abstention | Comments Off on CA9: Vacated and dismissed case on post-conviction doesn’t invoke Heck bar

D.N.M.: “Brady does not require the United States to disclose impeachment evidence before suppression hearings.”

“Brady does not require the United States to disclose impeachment evidence before suppression hearings.” United States v. Deleon, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9688 (D.N.M. Jan. 21, 2020). Defendant’s motion to suppress for lack of nexus between defendant’s home and possession … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Nexus | Comments Off on D.N.M.: “Brady does not require the United States to disclose impeachment evidence before suppression hearings.”

S.D.W.Va.: Reasonable mistake of fact def’s license was invalid doesn’t void the stop; smell of MJ led to search

The officer’s reasonable mistake of fact defendant’s license was invalid doesn’t void the stop. “In sum, Detective Maniskas was sufficiently diligent in his investigation of Qualls’ licenses. The fact that Qualls’ license was actually valid has no impact on Maniskas’ … Continue reading →

Posted in Qualified immunity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: Reasonable mistake of fact def’s license was invalid doesn’t void the stop; smell of MJ led to search

OH5: Officer’s entry into garage following erratic driver was justified as a welfare check on condition of driver, even though she was helped into the house

The officer’s entry into defendant’s garage after the car was parked askew and the door left open justified a welfare check at the door of the house. The officer responded to a 911 call about an erratic driver, and he … Continue reading →

Posted in Community caretaking function | Comments Off on OH5: Officer’s entry into garage following erratic driver was justified as a welfare check on condition of driver, even though she was helped into the house

CA11: No justification is needed for a jail booking strip search

No justification is needed for a jail booking strip search. [The court alludes to what might possibly be some factual justification but doesn’t say that it was.] Watkins v. Pinnock, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 1881 (11th Cir. Jan. 22, 2020). … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Prison and jail searches, Strip search | Comments Off on CA11: No justification is needed for a jail booking strip search

PA: Officer retaining ID means citizen not free to leave and is seized

Retaining a motorist’s identification to run a warrant check was a seizure of the person. No one would feel free to leave under those circumstances. Commonwealth v. Cost, 2020 Pa. LEXIS 315 (Jan. 22, 2020):

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on PA: Officer retaining ID means citizen not free to leave and is seized

MT: If only car color doesn’t match registration and everything else is correct, no RS

The car’s color not matching the registration information is not reasonable suspicion if everything else matches. City of Billings v. Rodriguez, 2020 MT 9 (Jan. 21, 2020). Plaintiff appeals dismissal of his § 1983 case for the officer pulling a … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MT: If only car color doesn’t match registration and everything else is correct, no RS

WaPo: Editorial: A scary new facial recognition tool underlines the urgent need for privacy laws

WaPo: Editorial: A scary new facial recognition tool underlines the urgent need for privacy laws (“Privacy Doomsayers have always said the failure to regulate surveillance technology would result in the end of anonymity. But we didn’t realize doom might come … Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WaPo: Editorial: A scary new facial recognition tool underlines the urgent need for privacy laws

NYTimes: Opinion: DNA Collection at the Border Threatens the Privacy of All Americans

NYTimes: Opinion: DNA Collection at the Border Threatens the Privacy of All Americans by Daniel I. Morales, Natalie Ram and Jessica L. Roberts (“We’re one step closer to the ‘genetic panopticon’ that Antonin Scalia warned us about.”)

Posted in Body searches, DNA | Comments Off on NYTimes: Opinion: DNA Collection at the Border Threatens the Privacy of All Americans

Legal Intelligencer: Commentary: Password Protection and the Foregone Conclusion Exception

Legal Intelligencer: Commentary: Password Protection and the Foregone Conclusion Exception by Leonard Deutchman (“In this month’s article, I will review Davis and discuss its reasoning and what the foregone conclusion exception, in the age of computer passwords, tells us about … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Privileges | Comments Off on Legal Intelligencer: Commentary: Password Protection and the Foregone Conclusion Exception

The Recorder: Analysis: Why Is the Justice Department Knocking Harder at Apple’s Backdoor?

The Recorder: Analysis: Why Is the Justice Department Knocking Harder at Apple’s Backdoor? by Frank Ready (“Apple once again finds itself in the crosshairs of another encryption debate, but placing constant pressure on the company and other tech giants may … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Privileges | Comments Off on The Recorder: Analysis: Why Is the Justice Department Knocking Harder at Apple’s Backdoor?

NJLJ: ‘Private Enclave’? Supreme Court Deciding Whether Cellphone Passcodes Are Protected

NJLJ: ‘Private Enclave’? Supreme Court Deciding Whether Cellphone Passcodes Are Protected by Suzette Parmley (“The case ‘could cause the court to diverge on constitutional amendments’ and have a seminal impact, Justice Barry Albin said during the arguments at the Richard … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Privileges | Comments Off on NJLJ: ‘Private Enclave’? Supreme Court Deciding Whether Cellphone Passcodes Are Protected

NYTimes: You Are Now Remotely Controlled

NYTimes: You Are Now Remotely Controlled (“Surveillance capitalists control the science and the scientists, the secrets and the truth.”):

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NYTimes: You Are Now Remotely Controlled