CA10: NM metropolitan courts can issue SWs; they’re not governed by Rule 41, just the 4A

The New Mexico metropolitan court had jurisdiction to issue search warrants even though it had no general jurisdiction over felony cases. A state issued search warrant doesn’t need to comply with Rule 41; it only need comply with the Fourth Amendment. It was based on probable cause, and defendant’s Franks claim is rejected for lack of a proper showing. United States v. Sadlowski, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 2072 (10th Cir. Jan. 23, 2020).

Defendant’s claim he was moving from Las Vegas to Minnesota and was in a hurry was belied by his travel plans. “The district court identified those factors [of reasonable suspicion] as: (1) Berg was traveling in a rental car; (2) Berg had trouble expressing whether he lived in Las Vegas and what he did there; (3) Berg was nervous because his breathing was shallow and quick throughout the encounter; (4) Berg took an indirect route of travel; and (5) Berg said he was in a rush to get home, but his statements about his travel timeline, rental agreement, and travel route made that assertion implausible. We agree that Trooper Seiler had reasonable suspicion to prolong the stop while he waited for the drug dog.” United States v. Berg, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 2071 (10th Cir. Jan. 23, 2020).*

This entry was posted in Reasonable suspicion, Warrant requirement. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.