Author Archives: Hall

N.D.W.Va.: Traffic stop was valid and led to plain view of drugs on passenger seat

The headings tell us the case: “A. Lieutenant Kennedy had the requisite reasonable, articulable suspicion of unlawful conduct to initiate a traffic stop on Defendant’s vehicle based upon traffic violations and erratic driving consistent with that of an impaired driver.” … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.W.Va.: Traffic stop was valid and led to plain view of drugs on passenger seat

W.D.N.Y.: Def lacked standing in apts he owned and rented to relatives

Defendant lacked standing to contest the search of an apartment building he owned but rented the units out to relatives. The CI, however, puts the defendant in one of the apartments with cocaine and a firearm ten days before the … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Def lacked standing in apts he owned and rented to relatives

ME: Statute requiring blood draw in fatal accident without PC violates 4A; but GFE applied here

Maine’s statute that requires a blood draw of the driver in a fatal or near fatal accident without probable cause violates the Fourth Amendment. Thus, the 2007 case upholding the statute is overruled. It cannot be categorized under the special … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Exclusionary rule, Special needs | Comments Off on ME: Statute requiring blood draw in fatal accident without PC violates 4A; but GFE applied here

EFF: U.K. Police Will Soon be able to Search Through U.S. Data Without Asking a Judge

EFF: U.K. Police Will Soon be able to Search Through U.S. Data Without Asking a Judge by Joe Mullin:

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on EFF: U.K. Police Will Soon be able to Search Through U.S. Data Without Asking a Judge

CA9: Tasering a man in his own bed not cooperating in being arrested could be found excessive

A jury could reasonably conclude that using a Taser on plaintiff lying on his own bed, on his cell phone trying to call his lawyer, who didn’t violently resist but just pulled his arm away, was an unreasonable use of … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Seizure | Comments Off on CA9: Tasering a man in his own bed not cooperating in being arrested could be found excessive

TN: Def consented to a full patdown and admitted he had a crackpipe

The officer could tell the driver to get out of the car in a traffic stop. Defendant then consented to a full patdown that produced a crack pipe. When the officer touched it and asked what it was, defendant freely … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent | Comments Off on TN: Def consented to a full patdown and admitted he had a crackpipe

N.D.Tex.: Three SWs not part of case were not subject to judicial notice

In a civil case, the court refuses to take judicial notice of the facts alleged in three search warrants that are not part of the case. Aubrey v. D Magazine Partners, L.P., 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12304 (N.D. Tex. Jan. … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on N.D.Tex.: Three SWs not part of case were not subject to judicial notice

WaPo: Perspective: Facebook will now show you exactly how it stalks you — even when you’re not using Facebook

WaPo: Perspective: Facebook will now show you exactly how it stalks you — even when you’re not using Facebook by Geoffrey A. Fowler (“The new ‘Off-Facebook Activity’ tool reminds us we’re living in a reality TV program where the cameras … Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WaPo: Perspective: Facebook will now show you exactly how it stalks you — even when you’re not using Facebook

The Intercept: The Rise of Smart Camera Networks, and Why We Should Ban Them

The Intercept: The Rise of Smart Camera Networks, and Why We Should Ban Them by Michael Kwet (“The rise of all-seeing smart camera networks is an alarming development that threatens civil rights and liberties throughout the world. Law enforcement agencies … Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on The Intercept: The Rise of Smart Camera Networks, and Why We Should Ban Them

techdirt: Supreme Court Asked To Tell Cops That Consenting To A Search Is Not Consenting To Having Your Home Destroyed

techdirt: Supreme Court Asked To Tell Cops That Consenting To A Search Is Not Consenting To Having Your Home Destroyed by Tim Cushing:

Posted in Reasonableness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on techdirt: Supreme Court Asked To Tell Cops That Consenting To A Search Is Not Consenting To Having Your Home Destroyed

D.Mont.: “he’s not fucking here—go fucking look” was consent to enter

The government met its burden of proof that defendants consented to entry into their house to look for a wanted man by their saying “he’s not fucking here—go fucking look” and “he’s not fucking in there—go ahead.” United States v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Search incident | Comments Off on D.Mont.: “he’s not fucking here—go fucking look” was consent to enter

Bloomberg Law: INSIGHT: State Investigations—50 Takes on Subpoena, Privilege, Document Rules

Bloomberg Law: INSIGHT: State Investigations—50 Takes on Subpoena, Privilege, Document Rules by Brendan Parets:

Posted in Privileges, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on Bloomberg Law: INSIGHT: State Investigations—50 Takes on Subpoena, Privilege, Document Rules

OR: Car owner had no REP from GPS installed by his company before he got the car from them

Plaintiff worked for Toyota Motor Credit and Toyota Financial Services. When he severed his employment with them, he was allowed to keep the vehicle he used for them. Unbeknownst to him, Toyota Financial Services had a GPS device on the … Continue reading →

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on OR: Car owner had no REP from GPS installed by his company before he got the car from them

FL5: Appellate counsel in direct appeal was ineffective for not arguing automobile exception wasn’t applicable; if it had been argued, court would have reversed

In defendant’s original appeal, appellate counsel argued only that the search incident doctrine applied and he failed on that issue. On post-conviction, however, new counsel argued that the automobile exception should have been argued and that it did not apply … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on FL5: Appellate counsel in direct appeal was ineffective for not arguing automobile exception wasn’t applicable; if it had been argued, court would have reversed

CA1: Franks offer of proof didn’t show materiality or undermine PC

Defendant’s appeal is based on his claim that the district court erred in not holding a Franks hearing. Defendant didn’t show enough in his allegations to show that the omissions were material to the showing of probable cause. United States … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Pole cameras | Comments Off on CA1: Franks offer of proof didn’t show materiality or undermine PC

D.Mont.: Def was arrested for DUI; so, already detained, a dog sniff wasn’t unreasonable

Defendant was arrested for DUI, and the court finds, based on United States v. Hunnicutt, 135 F.3d 1345, 1350 (10th Cir. 1998), that “detention of the driver at the scene to accomplish a canine sniff is generally reasonable where the … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonableness, Search incident | Comments Off on D.Mont.: Def was arrested for DUI; so, already detained, a dog sniff wasn’t unreasonable

WHYY: The Pa. State Police was warned about possible racial bias in car searches. The agency’s answer? End the research.

WHYY: The Pa. State Police was warned about possible racial bias in car searches. The agency’s answer? End the research. By Daniel Simmons-Ritchie and Angela Couloumbis, Spotlight PA (“Last fall, under scrutiny for its decision years earlier to stop tracking … Continue reading →

Posted in Pretext | Comments Off on WHYY: The Pa. State Police was warned about possible racial bias in car searches. The agency’s answer? End the research.

PA: Realtime CSLI also subject to Carpenter; orders here under state wiretap act complied with 4A

The state obtained realtime CSLI with court orders under the state wiretapping statute, and these orders were sufficiently like search warrants under Dalia v. United States. (Carpenter was decided while his case was on appeal.) The court finds that the … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information | Comments Off on PA: Realtime CSLI also subject to Carpenter; orders here under state wiretap act complied with 4A

OH6: Checking DMV records involves no 4A intrustion

“[T]he law is clear that a police officer’s check of a person’s Bureau of Motor Vehicles records does not implicate Fourth Amendment rights, as it does not constitute an invasion as it involves no intrusion.” State v. Price, 2020-Ohio-220, 2020 … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on OH6: Checking DMV records involves no 4A intrustion

D.R.I.: Carpenter procedural and not substantive and not a “new rule” under Teague

Carpenter is not entitled to retroactive application to post-conviction cases under Teague. It is procedural, not substantive. United States v. Sandoval, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11281 (D.R.I. Jan. 23, 2020):

Posted in Cell site location information | Comments Off on D.R.I.: Carpenter procedural and not substantive and not a “new rule” under Teague