Author Archives: Hall

CA7: Unreasonable administrative delay in releasing pretrial detainees entitled to release violates 4A

Unreasonable administrative delay in getting people out of jail that are entitled to it violates the Fourth Amendment under Gerstein and County of Riverside. Williams v. Dart, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 23132 (7th Cir. July 23, 2020):

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA7: Unreasonable administrative delay in releasing pretrial detainees entitled to release violates 4A

CA9: Police following a blood trail onto curtilage after recent crime was exigency

The district court concluded defendant had no standing to challenge a tribal police search of the curtilage of his grandmother’s house where he was an overnight guest. Assuming, without deciding, he has standing, there was clear and obvious exigency for … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Exclusionary rule, Overbreadth | Comments Off on CA9: Police following a blood trail onto curtilage after recent crime was exigency

D.Haw.: 4A IAC requires showing standing, too

Defendant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim for a search issue has to show that he had standing to even make the Fourth Amendment challenge, which he doesn’t. It’s an integral part of the merits claim. United States v. Scher, 2020 … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Ineffective assistance, Standing | Comments Off on D.Haw.: 4A IAC requires showing standing, too

IA: Answering statement officer was coming in with a question was acquiescence

The state conceded that hot pursuit didn’t justify their entry and relied on consent. “Nor could Boley’s act of letting the officers in be construed as consent. When the officer said she would be coming in, Boley responded with a … Continue reading →

Posted in Constitutionally protected area, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on IA: Answering statement officer was coming in with a question was acquiescence

Slate: Customs and Border Protection Can Track Cars Nationwide Via Commercial Database

Slate: Customs and Border Protection Can Track Cars Nationwide Via Commercial Database by Hannah Klein (“It turns out that U.S. Customs and Border Protection could now keep an eye on your car without even getting a warrant. This month, we … Continue reading →

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data | Comments Off on Slate: Customs and Border Protection Can Track Cars Nationwide Via Commercial Database

Law and Crime: Two DHS Officials Apparently Just Admitted Their Troops Have Been Violating the Constitution

Law and Crime: Two DHS Officials Apparently Just Admitted Their Troops Have Been Violating the Constitution by Colin Kalmbacher (“Acting Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Chad Wolf and one of his subordinates appear to have admitted their agents have … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on Law and Crime: Two DHS Officials Apparently Just Admitted Their Troops Have Been Violating the Constitution

VA: 4A claim waived by not getting ruling below

Defendant waived his Fourth Amendment claim by not getting a ruling on the issue in the trial court. Spencer v. Commonwealth, 2020 Va. App. LEXIS 206 (July 21, 2020). Defendant lost his search claim in the district court and on … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Waiver | Comments Off on VA: 4A claim waived by not getting ruling below

CA9: 4A issues in “travel ban” case: expungement of records unconstitutionally obtained is a remedy

“Addressing plaintiffs’ Fourth Amendment search claims, the panel first held that the expungement relief sought by plaintiffs — the expungement of all records unconstitutionally obtained and maintained — was available under the Constitution to remedy the alleged constitutional violations. Because … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens | Comments Off on CA9: 4A issues in “travel ban” case: expungement of records unconstitutionally obtained is a remedy

CA6: Def showed no REP in package with a fake name sent to his house

Defendant showed no reasonable expectation of privacy in a package addressed to a fake name at his address. United States v. James, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 22766 (6th Cir. July 21, 2020). Defendant failed to show that the challenged statements … Continue reading →

Posted in Anticipatory warrant, Automobile exception, Franks doctrine, Mail and packages | Comments Off on CA6: Def showed no REP in package with a fake name sent to his house

CA6: Camera in fake smoke detector outside def’s door in apt building hallway violated no REP

Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in images captured by a camera warrantlessly placed in a fake smoke detector on the ceiling of his apartment building hallway right outside his door. United States v. Trice, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Pole cameras, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA6: Camera in fake smoke detector outside def’s door in apt building hallway violated no REP

CA8: Mistake of name in SW affidavit deleted by district court wasn’t material

The affidavit for search warrant here originally used the name “Aaren” but the officer found “Taylor” could be the last name, and the affidavit was changed for that. It turned out that there were two people. The district court properly … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA8: Mistake of name in SW affidavit deleted by district court wasn’t material

PA: State waived challenge to def’s reliance on state constitution

The state waived its challenge to the defendant’s reliance on the state constitution by failure to litigate it below. Waiver claims have to be applied evenhandedly between the state and defendants. Commonwealth v. Wolfel, 2020 Pa. LEXIS 3797 (July 21, … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Nexus, State constitution, Waiver | Comments Off on PA: State waived challenge to def’s reliance on state constitution

W.D.Mo.: Def’s arrest at door in underwear permitted protective sweep before getting his clothes

Defendant was arrested in his house on a cold and dreary day. He answered the door in his underwear. Officers were permitted to conduct a protective sweep before getting his clothing for transport because at least one other person expected … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Plain view, feel, smell, Protective sweep | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Def’s arrest at door in underwear permitted protective sweep before getting his clothes

Rolling Stone: How Oregon Is Pushing Back Against ‘Kidnap and False Arrest’ by Trump’s Agents

Rolling Stone: How Oregon Is Pushing Back Against ‘Kidnap and False Arrest’ by Trump’s Agents by Tim Dickinson (“As state decries constitutional abuses by federal officers, Trump threatens to impose tactics nationally”)

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on Rolling Stone: How Oregon Is Pushing Back Against ‘Kidnap and False Arrest’ by Trump’s Agents

N.D.Fla.: Drug officers with PC can use patrol officers to make a stop on a traffic offense

Drug officers had probable cause but used patrol officers to make a stop based on a traffic offense, which there also was. The initial probable cause controls here. United States v. Green, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126663 (N.D. Fla. July … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on N.D.Fla.: Drug officers with PC can use patrol officers to make a stop on a traffic offense

CA7: “The Fourth Amendment does not require best practices in criminal investigations.” Just PC

“The Fourth Amendment does not require best practices in criminal investigations.” That a controlled buy could have been done better doesn’t mean there wasn’t probable cause. United States v. Glenn, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 22544 (7th Cir. July 20, 2020):

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on CA7: “The Fourth Amendment does not require best practices in criminal investigations.” Just PC

CA10: USDC isn’t obligated to draw same Franks inferences the def does

When a defendant makes a Franks challenge, the court is not obliged to make the same inference he makes in determining whether he gets a hearing. Franks requires a “substantial preliminary showing” of recklessness or acting intentionally along with materiality. … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on CA10: USDC isn’t obligated to draw same Franks inferences the def does

E.D.N.C.: Tower dump order different than long term CSLI; § 2703 order suffices under Carpenter

“In light of the significant differences between a tower dump CLSI and long term CSLI targeted at the whole of an individual’s movements, as highlighted by the court’s decision in Carpenter, the court finds no basis for attaching a Fourth … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: Tower dump order different than long term CSLI; § 2703 order suffices under Carpenter

D.Idaho: Broad email warrants are not per se unreasonable

Broad email search warrants were not unreasonable just because they were broad. The breadth of the financial crime under investigation justifies it. In addition, the good faith exception applies and it’s too early to tell if any has to be … Continue reading →

Posted in E-mail, Particularity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Idaho: Broad email warrants are not per se unreasonable

techdirt: The FBI Is Abusing The All Writs Act To Gain Access To Millions Of Travel Records

techdirt: The FBI Is Abusing The All Writs Act To Gain Access To Millions Of Travel Records by Tim Cushing:

Posted in Surveillance technology, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on techdirt: The FBI Is Abusing The All Writs Act To Gain Access To Millions Of Travel Records