W.D.Mo.: Def’s arrest at door in underwear permitted protective sweep before getting his clothes

Defendant was arrested in his house on a cold and dreary day. He answered the door in his underwear. Officers were permitted to conduct a protective sweep before getting his clothing for transport because at least one other person expected to be there wasn’t accounted for. Guns were lawfully found under the bed. United States v. Rodriguez, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126980 (W.D. Mo. June 8, 2020)

“Officers Bak and Chawla each had probable cause to search the Chevy since they observed ammunition and a handgun magazine in the backseat, and overheard Richardson state that he is a felon. Those facts, taken together, created a reasonable belief that Richardson was a felon in possession of ammunition and potentially a firearm in violation of law, and that the Chevy contained evidence of that crime (i.e., the ammunition and the magazine). The officers were accordingly permitted to search the Chevy for the weapon associated with the ammunition and magazine, and seize the ammunition and magazine as evidence.” United States v. Richardson, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 127364 (C.D. Cal. July 20, 2020).*

This entry was posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Plain view, feel, smell, Protective sweep. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.