Author Archives: Hall

CA6: Police called to ER for shooting victim can make plain view

When the police are called to the ER for a shooting victim, the bloody clothes can be in plain view. United States v. Clancy, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 35567 (6th Cir. Nov. 12, 2020):

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on CA6: Police called to ER for shooting victim can make plain view

NY2: Failure to call officer involved at suppression hearing was waiver here

Defendant’s claim of his statement being in violation of the Fourth Amendment isn’t preserved for appeal by lack of testimony of the officer involved. People v. Molina, 2020 NY Slip Op 06553. 2020 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6651 (2d Dept. … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Suppression hearings, Waiver | Comments Off on NY2: Failure to call officer involved at suppression hearing was waiver here

CA5: No standing or REP in the CSLI of another

Defendant didn’t have a reasonable expectation of privacy (standing) in the movements of a cell phone of another. Still, it was with a warrant, and there is no defect in the warrant process. United States v. Beaudion, 2020 U.S. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on CA5: No standing or REP in the CSLI of another

N.D.Cal.: Failure to mention denial of a TRO in civil litigation over similar issue material enough to get Franks hearing

The fact a TRO had been denied in a civil case involving some of the same facts was potentially material under Franks, and he gets a Franks hearing. Also, defendants have no standing in the search of a co-conspirator’s home. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Failure to mention denial of a TRO in civil litigation over similar issue material enough to get Franks hearing

W.D.N.Y.: Likelihood of suppression isn’t a factor at detention hearing

Defendant’s assertion at a detention hearing that there is some “likelihood” he may win suppression of evidence isn’t a factor in the decision to release. He’s still entitled to the presumption of innocence, but, essentially, exclusion isn’t ever likely enough … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Likelihood of suppression isn’t a factor at detention hearing

Filter: DEA Pursues Vast Expansion of Patient Surveillance

Filter: DEA Pursues Vast Expansion of Patient Surveillance by Sessi Kuwabara Blanchard (“The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) is looking to expand its anti-diversion surveillance infrastructure by being able to search and analyze myriad patient behaviors for the vast majority of … Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on Filter: DEA Pursues Vast Expansion of Patient Surveillance

D.C.Cir.: IAC claim presented first in court of appeals decided without remand; claim fails on its face

Defendant raised his ineffective assistance claim first in the Court of Appeals. Usually, the court says it would remand for an evidentiary hearing. Here, however, his allegation is facially insufficient and the issue is decided without a remand. The challenge … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Automobile exception, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.C.Cir.: IAC claim presented first in court of appeals decided without remand; claim fails on its face

E.D.Pa.: Prior flight from an officer adds nothing to RS calculus

Prior flight from an officer adds nothing to the reasonable suspicion calculus, but the remainder here does. United States v. Foushee, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 209986 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 10, 2020):

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Prior flight from an officer adds nothing to RS calculus

TX13: Legibility of issuing magistrate’s signature on SW is subject to GFE

The legibility of the signature of the issuing magistrate for a search warrant is an issue subject to the good faith exception. This court first held the illegibility was reason to suppress, but the Court of Criminal Appeals reversed. State … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on TX13: Legibility of issuing magistrate’s signature on SW is subject to GFE

NJ: Occupants of car leaving area of a robbery not responding to light in the eyes as it passed by is not RS

The officer on his way to a robbery call used the spotlight on his patrol car to illuminate the interior of cars passing by him in the other lane. When the occupants of defendant’s car didn’t respond the same as … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NJ: Occupants of car leaving area of a robbery not responding to light in the eyes as it passed by is not RS

OH12: Drug dog’s alert to residual odor of drugs is not a lack of PC

A drug dog’s alert to the residual odor of drugs isn’t a lack of probable cause. “Accordingly, the fact that Mox [the drug dog] could have alerted to a residual odor of drugs does not mean that there was not … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Dog sniff, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH12: Drug dog’s alert to residual odor of drugs is not a lack of PC

IL: There are no degrees of illegality in 4A cases with differing standards

There are no degrees of illegality in Fourth Amendment cases with differing standards. People v. Massamillo, 2020 IL App (3d) 190765, 2020 Ill. App. LEXIS 754 (Nov. 9, 2020):

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on IL: There are no degrees of illegality in 4A cases with differing standards

W.D.Tex.: “Laundry list” argument of a lack of particularity rejected

The officer affiant corroborated the CI’s information and there was substantial evidence of probable cause. The affidavit was not bare bones. Even if the affidavit lacked probable cause, the good faith exception applies. Defendant’s “laundry list” argument of a lack … Continue reading →

Posted in General warrant, Particularity | Comments Off on W.D.Tex.: “Laundry list” argument of a lack of particularity rejected

Reason: SCOTUS Considers Whether James King Has Any Recourse Against the Cops Who Choked and Beat Him for No Good Reason

Reason: SCOTUS Considers Whether James King Has Any Recourse Against the Cops Who Choked and Beat Him for No Good Reason by Jacob Sullum:

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on Reason: SCOTUS Considers Whether James King Has Any Recourse Against the Cops Who Choked and Beat Him for No Good Reason

KS: Officer’s delay by seeking backup for safety reasons during nighttime stop where he was outnumbered was reasonable

“From the initiation of the traffic stop at 3:23 a.m. until the moment when Officer Trout observed drug paraphernalia in plain view next to Lutz, the stop was not measurably extended beyond its basic objective of processing the observed traffic … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonableness, Standing | Comments Off on KS: Officer’s delay by seeking backup for safety reasons during nighttime stop where he was outnumbered was reasonable

M.D.Pa.: Trash pull alone didn’t add up to PC, but GFE applies

The affidavit didn’t have enough information to corroborate the trash pull, but the evidence is apparent that the officer relied on it in good faith. United States v. Ray, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 207885 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 6, 2020):

Posted in Good faith exception, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Trash pull alone didn’t add up to PC, but GFE applies

IN: Officers had sufficient suspicion of contraband on the person for a booking strip search

Officers had the requisite degree of suspicion for a strip search at the jail for a misdemeanor. He had suspicions there was something amiss with defendant’s unusual small talk, but, coupled with the facts, added up. Reagan v. State, 2020 … Continue reading →

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Strip search | Comments Off on IN: Officers had sufficient suspicion of contraband on the person for a booking strip search

Vice: Police Are Tapping Into Ring Cameras to Expand Surveillance Network In Mississippi

Vice: Police Are Tapping Into Ring Cameras to Expand Surveillance Network In Mississippi by Edward Ongweso Jr (“The police department in Jackson, Mississippi is partnering with two companies to stream surveillance footage from Ring cameras in a 45-day pilot program.”)

Posted in Digital privacy, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Vice: Police Are Tapping Into Ring Cameras to Expand Surveillance Network In Mississippi

CA6: State officer assisting a federal search is the subject of assault under 18 U.S.C. § 1114

A state officer assisting federal officers in a search can be the subject of assault while executing a warrant under 18 U.S.C. § 1114. United States v. Scurry, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 35068 (6th Cir. Nov. 5, 2020). Defendant officers … Continue reading →

Posted in Qualified immunity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA6: State officer assisting a federal search is the subject of assault under 18 U.S.C. § 1114

CA4: Baltimore’s aerial surveillance program doesn’t violate 4A

Baltimore PD’s Aerial Investigative Research program (AIR) does not violate the reasonable expectation of privacy of Baltimore residents, and denial of the preliminary injunction is affirmed on appeal. Leaders of a Beautiful Struggle v. Baltimore Police Dep’t, 2020 U.S. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Open fields, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA4: Baltimore’s aerial surveillance program doesn’t violate 4A