Author Archives: Hall

E.D.Pa.: Can’t relitigate denial of motion to suppress in motion for new trial

A motion for new trial is not the place to relitigate denial of a motion to suppress. United States v. Mack, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14024 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 16, 2021). There was reasonable suspicion on the totality for defendant’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Can’t relitigate denial of motion to suppress in motion for new trial

N.D.Ga.: “Any and all” in a SW is severable to maintain particularity

Catch-all language, like “any and all” in a list of things to be seized, is severable to narrow the warrant. United States v. Qadri, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13975 (N.D. Ga. Jan. 26, 2021). “Based on the totality of the … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: “Any and all” in a SW is severable to maintain particularity

Reason: Cops Must Destroy Illegal Surveillance Videos From Spa Visited by Robert Kraft

Reason: Cops Must Destroy Illegal Surveillance Videos From Spa Visited by Robert Kraft by Elizabeth Nolan Brown (“Authorities ‘shall destroy the videos unlawfully obtained through the surveillance of the Orchids of Asia Day Spa,’ a federal judge says.”)

Posted in Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on Reason: Cops Must Destroy Illegal Surveillance Videos From Spa Visited by Robert Kraft

CA9: When the 4A question isn’t settled, the alleged 4A violation can’t be egregious in immigration cases

“In immigration proceedings, the exclusionary rule applies to evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment only when the violation is egregious. … Petitioners bear the burden of making a prima facie showing of an egregious Fourth Amendment violation. … … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Immigration arrests | Comments Off on CA9: When the 4A question isn’t settled, the alleged 4A violation can’t be egregious in immigration cases

CA4: When lower court decides both PC and GFE, on appeal either one can be decided

When the district court decides both probable cause for issuance of the warrant and the good faith exception applies, the court of appeals need only decide one; here good faith. “Because our review of the record demonstrates that the affidavit … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA4: When lower court decides both PC and GFE, on appeal either one can be decided

A.F.: Particularity and avoiding general warrants in electronic searches

“In charting how to apply the Fourth Amendment to searches of electronic devices, we glean from our reading of the case law a zone in which such searches are expansive enough to allow investigators access to places where incriminating materials … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Particularity, Probable cause | Comments Off on A.F.: Particularity and avoiding general warrants in electronic searches

LA: RS was “close question,” and evidence supports conclusion

The trial court found the reasonable suspicion close, and it concluded there was. “The testimony and evidence support the trial’s court’s finding that Zimmerman had reasonable suspicion of possible criminal activity to extend the stop to allow a canine to … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on LA: RS was “close question,” and evidence supports conclusion

D.Mont.: State trooper’s alleged violation of a tribal agreement with state wasn’t sufficient for exclusionary rule

A Montana state trooper’s alleged violations of a cross deputization agreement with a tribe wasn’t justification for exclusion of evidence from his stop of defendant. “The Court fails to make the connection between any constitutional violation whose remedy is suppression … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on D.Mont.: State trooper’s alleged violation of a tribal agreement with state wasn’t sufficient for exclusionary rule

E.D.Tenn.: Guilty plea in state court precludes claim that arrest lacked PC

Having pled guilty in state court, plaintiff can’t complain that the arrest leading to the plea lacked probable cause. Moser v. Davis, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13308 (E.D. Tenn. Jan. 25, 2021). Petitioner had a “full and fair” opportunity to … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Guilty plea in state court precludes claim that arrest lacked PC

S.D.Ill.: Rule 41(g) doesn’t permit return of property held by state officers

“As this Court has tried to explain several times, the property Turner seeks is held by the Illinois State Police–not the Federal Government. The Court cannot order the Government to return something that it does not have. For these reasons, … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on S.D.Ill.: Rule 41(g) doesn’t permit return of property held by state officers

N.D.W.Va.: No REP in readily visible interior of car

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in the interior of a car visible through the window. United States v. Swartz, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 248194 (N.D. W.Va. Dec. 11, 2020),* adopted, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10918 (N.D. W.Va. Jan. … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Private search | Comments Off on N.D.W.Va.: No REP in readily visible interior of car

N.D.Ohio: Vaguely matching description except for race and wearing a hoodie wasn’t RS

“The Court finds that the articulable justification presented for initially stopping Defendant was that he was a black male wearing a black hoodie in the vicinity of Washington Park. Based on the totality of the circumstances, and considering the information … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Vaguely matching description except for race and wearing a hoodie wasn’t RS

Nothing online is completely private: Parler data dump of “ethically hacked posts”

NYTimes: How Parler Reveals the Alarming Trajectory of Political Violence by Candace Rondeaux and Heather Hurlburt:

Posted in Digital privacy, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on Nothing online is completely private: Parler data dump of “ethically hacked posts”

D.Md.: Despite recreational MJ use in state, smell of MJ before that was PC

At the time of the encounter with the Maryland police, the smell of marijuana on the person was probable cause. That changed later, but the search of the person was valid when it happened. Moreover, possession of marijuana is still … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Md.: Despite recreational MJ use in state, smell of MJ before that was PC

NBC: Swiping alt-right: How catfishing for democracy helped users flag Capitol rioters to FBI

NBC News: Swiping alt-right: How catfishing for democracy helped users flag Capitol rioters to FBI with Ali Vitali

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on NBC: Swiping alt-right: How catfishing for democracy helped users flag Capitol rioters to FBI

WUSA9: DC residents get visits from FBI as agents track cell phones that pinged near the Capitol

WUSA9: DC residents get visits from FBI as agents track cell phones that pinged near the Capitol by Bruce Lashon (“A DC woman said an FBI agent contacted her and said investigators were reaching out to the owner of every … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, geofence, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WUSA9: DC residents get visits from FBI as agents track cell phones that pinged near the Capitol

IA: Trash container in the grass on the alley within easy reach was searchable

In a trash search case, the trash cans faced an alley but were on defendant’s grass. The officers could open the trash cans without stepping on the property. This was a valid trash search, and, having credited the officers’ testimony, … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on IA: Trash container in the grass on the alley within easy reach was searchable

IA: De novo review (apparently) means looking at the dashcam video

De novo review (apparently) means looking at the dashcam video: “Upon our review of the video, we find, as did the district court, Hales’s vehicle was ‘drifting left and traveling over the dividing line of the lanes’ at 12:30 in … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Standards of review | Comments Off on IA: De novo review (apparently) means looking at the dashcam video

D.Me.: No PC shown for SW in 33 year old rape and murder case, but GFE still applies (because two judges approved of it)

Defendant was the target of a 2019 search warrant for trophies (jewelry and clothing) from and ligatures used in sexual assaults and murders committed in 1986-88. Defendant did four stints in prison in between. A search warrant was issued for … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on D.Me.: No PC shown for SW in 33 year old rape and murder case, but GFE still applies (because two judges approved of it)

DE: “Surveilling” def by following him looking for discarded DNA wasn’t an unreasonable search or seizure

Defendant lived in Pennsylvania and was accused of unlawful sex in Delaware. A search warrant was obtained in Pennsylvania for his house, and there was probable cause for it and it was narrow and specific. His DNA had been obtained … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Search, Seizure, State constitution | Comments Off on DE: “Surveilling” def by following him looking for discarded DNA wasn’t an unreasonable search or seizure