Author Archives: Hall

D.N.M.: A vehicle could be stopped just because there was a warrant on the passenger

A vehicle could be stopped just because there was a warrant on the passenger. Here, ICE made the stop, and it was reasonably related to its justification. United States v. Murillo-Gonzalez, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38494 (D. N.M. Mar. 1, … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.N.M.: A vehicle could be stopped just because there was a warrant on the passenger

D.Kan.: “Frantic” furtive movements as officers approached stopped car justified drawing weapons

Defendant’s “frantic” furtive movements as he stopped during a traffic stop justified officers drawing down on him as they approached the car. “Then during Solis’s temporary detention, other facts arose establishing probable cause to arrest him. The Court therefore concludes … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Kan.: “Frantic” furtive movements as officers approached stopped car justified drawing weapons

CA10: Officer’s questions after completion of stop extended it by consent

The traffic stop evolved into reasonable suspicion of drug trafficking and then a drug dog could be used on the vehicle. After completing the stop, “As Mercado-Gracia walked back to his vehicle, however, Officer Wood invoked ‘the old highway patrol … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA10: Officer’s questions after completion of stop extended it by consent

M.D.Pa.: Tent in an open field might have had REP, but it was open to view inside and plain view applied

Assuming defendant’s tent in an “open field” area had a reasonable expectation of privacy (as the Ninth Circuit would hold), the tent was open and the officer could see in. There was no curtilage to the tent in an open … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Tent in an open field might have had REP, but it was open to view inside and plain view applied

CA2: Even if an administrative search was pretext for a criminal search, there was an independent basis for later SW

Defendants argued that an administrative search was a pretext for a criminal search. A later search warrant was based on independent information from state wiretaps. “Here, assuming arguendo that the administrative search was improper, suppression of the evidence obtained from … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Independent source | Comments Off on CA2: Even if an administrative search was pretext for a criminal search, there was an independent basis for later SW

NY Kings Co.: Exclusionary rule not applied in civil case to end tenancy under rent control statute

Defendant was convicted of surreptitiously recording a tenant in another apartment with planted wireless camera. Some evidence in the criminal proceeding was suppressed. In a civil case to void his tenancy under the rent control laws, the exclusionary rule is … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY Kings Co.: Exclusionary rule not applied in civil case to end tenancy under rent control statute

S.D.Ohio: Nexus shown for SW of business premises for drugs

“Applying this standard, the Field Affidavit is clearly not a bare bones affidavit. Intercepted phone calls, physical surveillance and trash pulls, along with information learned from confidential sources, would allow a reasonable officer ‘employing a healthy dose of common sense’ … Continue reading →

Posted in Nexus | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Nexus shown for SW of business premises for drugs

N.D.Ohio: Alleged ambiguity in whether nighttime search authorized resolved by all the circumstances in favor of it

It wasn’t obvious that the search warrant did not permit a nighttime search, and it was presented to the state judge at night involving a shooting that night. The circumstances were apparent that the search was to happen then. Moreover, … Continue reading →

Posted in Nighttime search | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Alleged ambiguity in whether nighttime search authorized resolved by all the circumstances in favor of it

S.D.Ohio: GFE overcomes lack of nexus; officer unaware of some facts didn’t commit Franks violation

The Franks hearing established that the officer didn’t know that certain things happened during the investigation, so the officer wasn’t withholding information or misleading the court. Probable cause and nexus is [less than] tenuous: “This evidence, standing alone, does not … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Nexus | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: GFE overcomes lack of nexus; officer unaware of some facts didn’t commit Franks violation

S.D.Ohio: Nexus shown to business from alleged drug transactions outside

Nexus was shown to a business where drug transactions outside appeared to have continued inside, or at least the participants went inside right after. In any event, the good faith exception applies. United States v. Scott, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Nexus shown to business from alleged drug transactions outside

MA: No REP in unlocked basement of apt building

After a police foot chase, officers entered an unlocked basement of an apartment building and found a firearm that looked like one they were looking for. Defendant can’t show a reasonable expectation of privacy in the basement because everybody in … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on MA: No REP in unlocked basement of apt building

OH12: State’s “reasonable mistake of fact” justification for stop has to be raised in trial court first

The state didn’t rely on a “reasonable mistake of fact” justification for the stop in the trial court, so it can’t for appeal. State v. Turner, 2021-Ohio-541, 2021 Ohio App. LEXIS 564 (12th Dist. Mar. 1, 2021). Defendant had some … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonableness, Waiver | Comments Off on OH12: State’s “reasonable mistake of fact” justification for stop has to be raised in trial court first

OH12: Officer responding to a mistreated dog call could walk to fence and look through then seize dog on exigency

An officer responded to an animal abuse complaint of a maltreated dog in defendant’s backyard. He parked in the driveway and walked to the door to inquire. No answer. He could see a fence with a missing board from the … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on OH12: Officer responding to a mistreated dog call could walk to fence and look through then seize dog on exigency

NE requires suppression issue be renewed when evidence admitted at trial

Failure to renew a suppression issue decided against you pretrial when the evidence is admitted is waiver in Nebraska. Besides, the issue on appeal would lose on the merits because the officer had reasonable suspicion for the stop and then … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Cell site location information, Good faith exception, Waiver | Comments Off on NE requires suppression issue be renewed when evidence admitted at trial

SD: Local officers called tribal officers and respected tribal authority before arresting def

Defendant was wanted for assault and found at an Indian casino hotel on a reservation. They took him into custody and towed his vehicle. The search of his hotel room and vehicle by search warrants was reasonable and respected tribal … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Community caretaking function, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on SD: Local officers called tribal officers and respected tribal authority before arresting def

OH1: Order to get out of car doesn’t unreasonably extend a traffic stop

An officer’s order to get out of the car during a traffic stop does not expand the stop, and it is reasonable. Agreeing in the trial court that the stop was valid bars litigating it on appeal. State v. Jackson, … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH1: Order to get out of car doesn’t unreasonably extend a traffic stop

D.Minn.: IAC Franks proffer rejected as lacking sworn affidavits or any credibility at all

Defendant’s 2255 claimed that defense counsel was ineffective for not making a Franks challenge. Defendant’s offer of proof is rejected as just without any credibility at all in light of the record previously made. United States v. Petruk, 2021 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.Minn.: IAC Franks proffer rejected as lacking sworn affidavits or any credibility at all

E.D.N.Y.: Def gets access to SW materials, but govt can redact informant’s info

The target of a search warrant long ago served is entitled to unsealing the affidavit, but the government can redact the affiant’s name and identifying information. United States v. Storage Room Numbers, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35977 (E.D. N.Y. Feb. … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, Prison and jail searches, Strip search | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Def gets access to SW materials, but govt can redact informant’s info

FL2: There was suspicion for the stop, but it wasn’t reasonable suspicion

There may have been suspicion for defendant’s stop, but it wasn’t reasonable suspicion. He was potentially dumpster driving at a closed business at night, and he left when he saw the police officer. Vonlydick v. State, 2021 Fla. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Search incident, Standing | Comments Off on FL2: There was suspicion for the stop, but it wasn’t reasonable suspicion

CA2: Three judges approved of these SWs, there was PC and GF

“Here, the state judge who issued the warrant interviewed the cooperating witness in camera. Two federal judges reviewed the state judge’s notes and also found probable cause for the issuance of the warrant. Hence, three judges independently found there was … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA2: Three judges approved of these SWs, there was PC and GF