Author Archives: Hall

D.Conn.: Handcuffing a concealed carry permit holder was without RS and unreasonable

“In light of the uncontested fact that Plaintiff presented his pistol permit to Defendant before or at the time he disclosed that he was in possession of a pistol and the absence of any other indicia that Plaintiff was otherwise … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Handcuffing a concealed carry permit holder was without RS and unreasonable

D.Minn.: Particularity in social media SWs is still evolving, and reliance on SW here was reasonable

Here, a Facebook warrant that allegedly lacked particularity was still close enough for the good faith exception. The law of particularity in social media warrants is still evolving, and it was reasonable for the officer to rely on the issuing … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity, Social media warrants | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Particularity in social media SWs is still evolving, and reliance on SW here was reasonable

CA1: Collective knowledge isn’t required of all officers, just those involved

Collective knowledge is not required of all the officers involved in the case, just the one with knowledge telling the one making the stop. Here there was reasonable suspicion for the stop. United States v. Cruz-Rivera, 19-1465 & 19-1509 (1st … Continue reading →

Posted in Collective knowledge, Probable cause, Seizure | Comments Off on CA1: Collective knowledge isn’t required of all officers, just those involved

CA3: Carpenter just doesn’t apply to jail call recordings

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in jail calls admitted to prove a conspiracy, and Carpenter doesn’t apply. “While we need not decide how far Carpenter extends to other technologies, it does not apply to prison phone calls. Unlike … Continue reading →

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA3: Carpenter just doesn’t apply to jail call recordings

CA1: Exigencies of dealing with a DUI crash and death made it reasonable to dispense with SW for BAC

Defendant was charged with DUI deaths in a national park. The exigencies of dealing with the crash and its aftermath justified the delay in BAC testing and getting it without a warrant. United States v. Manubolu, 20-1871 (1st Cir. Sept. … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on CA1: Exigencies of dealing with a DUI crash and death made it reasonable to dispense with SW for BAC

NE: Consent during unreasonable extension of stop not voluntary

The traffic stop was reasonable, but it was unreasonably extended. Defendant’s consent during that period was not attenuated. State v. Thompson, 30 Neb.App. 135 (Sept. 14, 2021):

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NE: Consent during unreasonable extension of stop not voluntary

Bloomberg: Robbery Poses Legal Test for Police Use of Google Location Data

Bloomberg: Robbery Poses Legal Test for Police Use of Google Location Data by Andrea Vittorio:

Posted in geofence | Comments Off on Bloomberg: Robbery Poses Legal Test for Police Use of Google Location Data

CA9: Dismissal of indictment for 4A extremely rare remedy; here, district court suppressed

Dismissal of the indictment for violations of the Fourth Amendment are strongly disfavored. Here, the district court suppressed the search, and the government dismissed counts. That’s remedy enough. United States v. Cano, 19-50240 (9th Cir. Aug. 31, 2021). Where the … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on CA9: Dismissal of indictment for 4A extremely rare remedy; here, district court suppressed

OH12: Second patdown in crotch area by male officer wasn’t unreasonable

A female officer patted this male defendant down, but she did not go around the crotch area. For officer safety, a male officer followed up and did. This was reasonable, and the contraband was found by plain feel. State v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Qualified immunity, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Stop and frisk, Waiver | Comments Off on OH12: Second patdown in crotch area by male officer wasn’t unreasonable

Ocala Post: Biden wants IRS to snoop into your bank account, know when you have $600 or more; some bankers say it violates the 4A (but it doesn’t)

Ocala Post: Biden wants IRS to snoop into your bank account, know when you have $600 or more (“Outraged citizens and banks alike want to know why President Joe Biden plans to allow the IRS to snoop into bank accounts, … Continue reading →

Posted in Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on Ocala Post: Biden wants IRS to snoop into your bank account, know when you have $600 or more; some bankers say it violates the 4A (but it doesn’t)

CO: Warrantless three month pole camera surveillance violated 4A

Warrantless three month pole camera surveillance violated the Fourth Amendment. People v. Tafoya, 2021 CO 62, 2021 Colo. LEXIS 882 (Sept. 13, 2021):

Posted in Pole cameras | Comments Off on CO: Warrantless three month pole camera surveillance violated 4A

NY Times: How the N.Y.P.D. Is Using Post-9/11 Tools on Everyday New Yorkers

NY Times: How the N.Y.P.D. Is Using Post-9/11 Tools on Everyday New Yorkers by Ali Watkins (“Two decades after the attack on New York City, the Police Department is using counterterrorism tools and tactics to combat routine street crime.”)

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NY Times: How the N.Y.P.D. Is Using Post-9/11 Tools on Everyday New Yorkers

NY Times: If the Police Lie, Should They Be Held Liable? Often the Answer Is No.

NY Times: If the Police Lie, Should They Be Held Liable? Often the Answer Is No. by Shaila Dewan (“Federal agents and police officers who work with them are often immune from lawsuits, even for serious rights violations. The Supreme … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on NY Times: If the Police Lie, Should They Be Held Liable? Often the Answer Is No.

NY Times: Hear That? It’s Your Voice Being Taken for Profit.

NY Times: Hear That? It’s Your Voice Being Taken for Profit. by Joseph Turow (“Based on voice signatures, patented Google circuitry infers gender and age. A parent can program the system to turn electronic devices on or off as a … Continue reading →

Posted in Digital privacy, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NY Times: Hear That? It’s Your Voice Being Taken for Profit.

CA11: Officer’s interpretation of obstructed LPN statute was objectively reasonable under Heien

Defendant’s argument that an Alabama statute on obstructed license plates could not apply to nonresident license plates was subject to reasonable mistake of fact or law under Heien. United States v. Braddy, 19-12823 (11th Cir. Aug. 31, 2021). The Los … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA11: Officer’s interpretation of obstructed LPN statute was objectively reasonable under Heien

CA11: Ga. Ct. App. case on point not “clearly established law”

“Orr argues, nevertheless, that it was clearly established that the Deputies could not search him and seize his property pursuant to the order, citing State v. Burgess, 826 S.E.2d 352 (Ga. App. 2019). We disagree. For starters, Burgess is an … Continue reading →

Posted in Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Ga. Ct. App. case on point not “clearly established law”

CA8: Usually no REP in car carried by car hauler even to owner, and here there was nothing showing REP

“During a safety inspection of a semi transporting three vehicles, an officer found about 40 pounds of meth in a Ford Explorer. Sierra-Serrano wants to suppress those drugs, arguing that the search violated the Fourth Amendment. But because Sierra did … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonableness, Standing | Comments Off on CA8: Usually no REP in car carried by car hauler even to owner, and here there was nothing showing REP

CA11: Two on deadly force in shooting at cars: one reasonable, one a fact dispute

Officer shooting at a car driving toward him acted reasonably. “Officer Brown reasonably perceived that his life was in danger when the Pontiac shifted into reverse. Redwine had led the police on a high-speed chase through commercial and residential areas … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA11: Two on deadly force in shooting at cars: one reasonable, one a fact dispute

CA6: Arrest was reasonable based on reasonable mistake of law or fact

The officers here had a reasonable basis for arresting plaintiff for obstruction of an officer, whether it was based on a reasonable mistake of fact or of law. And that plays into qualified immunity. Barrera v. City of Mount Pleasant, … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on CA6: Arrest was reasonable based on reasonable mistake of law or fact

AL: Suspicious noises inside from knock-and-talk was exigency

Police knock and talk led to them hearing noises of someone rushing around inside. They could also smell marijuana from outside, and they had information of buys from inside the house. Exigency established. Hall v. State, CR-20-0394 (Ala. Crim. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Knock and talk, Seizure | Comments Off on AL: Suspicious noises inside from knock-and-talk was exigency