Author Archives: Hall

CA4: Choking out and killing a mentally ill man who only vaguely threatened himself was excessive force

“This appeal arises from a tragic incident that led to the death of Joshua Lawhon, an unarmed mentally ill man. Invoking 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Virginia state law, Lawhon’s mother, as administrator of his estate, brought this action against … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA4: Choking out and killing a mentally ill man who only vaguely threatened himself was excessive force

TN: Civil investigative demand in deceptive trade practices case was reasonable

The Attorney General’s request for information (a subpoena) in a deceptive trade practices case was reasonable in scope and reasonably related to the AG’s authority under the statute. In re Investigation of Wall & Assocs., 2021 Tenn. App. LEXIS 449 … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Arrest or entry on arrest, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on TN: Civil investigative demand in deceptive trade practices case was reasonable

CA3: Federal court should abstain from entering state court red-flag proceeding

Federal court should abstain under Younger from a state red-flag law proceeding to remove firearms from the plaintiff. Greco v. Bruck, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 33660 (3d Cir. Nov. 12, 2021). Defendant’s being in an alley known for druggies and … Continue reading →

Posted in Abstention, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on CA3: Federal court should abstain from entering state court red-flag proceeding

D.Kan.: Felon in possession’s intentionally shooting himself and calling 911 led to reasonable entry

Defendant intentionally shot himself in the leg and called 911 for help. Police arrived and seized the gun, and he was a felon. The entry and remaining in the house was reasonable. United States v. Culpepper, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Felon in possession’s intentionally shooting himself and calling 911 led to reasonable entry

E.D.Mo.: One who could freely come and go from the house of another had standing

Defendant had a relationship with the property of another but he didn’t spend the night. He could come and go. That was sufficient for standing. The co-defendant’s case, however, already found probable cause. United States v. Futrell, 2021 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: One who could freely come and go from the house of another had standing

Reason: “The Fourth Amendment Limits of Internet Content Preservation”

Reason: “The Fourth Amendment Limits of Internet Content Preservation” by Orin S. Kerr (“A strong Fourth Amendment claim that criminal defense lawyers should be making.”):

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Social media warrants | Comments Off on Reason: “The Fourth Amendment Limits of Internet Content Preservation”

Politico: FBI raid on Project Veritas founder’s home sparks questions about press freedom

Politico: FBI raid on Project Veritas founder’s home sparks questions about press freedom by Josh Gerstein (“The action against James O’Keefe has prompted concern about the Biden administration’s commitment to the First Amendment.”) Is O’Keefe a “journalist” or not? He … Continue reading →

Posted in Privileges | Comments Off on Politico: FBI raid on Project Veritas founder’s home sparks questions about press freedom

Misc.

There was probable cause for the first and second search warrants for child pornography on defendant’s devices (took ~100 pages to say that). No exclusionary rule; good faith exception applies, too. United States v. Pena, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 218914 … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Good faith exception, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on Misc.

NY4: Minor typos in SW application don’t void the warrant

“We reject defendant’s contention that the search warrant for his cell phones was issued without probable cause. According ‘great deference to the issuing [Justice]’ …, we conclude that Supreme Court properly determined that there was sufficient information in the warrant … Continue reading →

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d), Warrant papers, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on NY4: Minor typos in SW application don’t void the warrant

E.D.Wis.: No hearing required on application of GFE; papers already show it

Defendant does not get a hearing on application of the good faith exception. The papers as a whole establish it for the government. The affidavit for the warrant showed sufficient information from observations for an inference that drugs were being … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: No hearing required on application of GFE; papers already show it

CA6: Individual officer not responsible for process that denied ptf prompt PC hearing under Riverside

While an arrested person has a right to a prompt judicial determination of probable cause for the arrest, it’s not necessarily on the officer to get the person before a magistrate. “[I]t was not objectively unreasonable for Wynkoop to expect … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: Individual officer not responsible for process that denied ptf prompt PC hearing under Riverside

S.D.N.Y.: Emailing SW materials subject to protective order results in contempt conviction

Defendant’s emailing a reporter search warrant materials subject to a protective order results in his conviction for contempt. Defendant understood the order, and only defense counsel was able to use the materials, not him. He was later pro se but … Continue reading →

Posted in Pretext, Probable cause, Warrant papers | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Emailing SW materials subject to protective order results in contempt conviction

TX10: Def’s invitation to look in vehicle console for receipt for allegedly stolen property led to plain view of drugs

Defendant was suspected of leaving a Lowes with a stolen shop vac. He was seen at a nearby McDonalds and officers came up to him. He volunteered that the receipt was in his console and they could look for it. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Issue preclusion, Plain view, feel, smell, Private search | Comments Off on TX10: Def’s invitation to look in vehicle console for receipt for allegedly stolen property led to plain view of drugs

MS: Judicial notice proper that SW execution at 11 pm is not during daylight hours

A court can take judicial notice that execution of a search warrant at 11 pm is not during daylight hours in Mississippi. Doe v. Doe, 2021 Miss. App. LEXIS 473 (Nov. 9, 2021) (only recognizing rule; this is not a … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Nighttime search, Seizure, Warrant execution | Comments Off on MS: Judicial notice proper that SW execution at 11 pm is not during daylight hours

Intercept: School Officials Welcome Homeland Security Surveillance After Student Fights

Intercept: School Officials Welcome Homeland Security Surveillance After Student Fights (“Administrators in Prince George’s County say they wanted help monitoring school safety — but sweeping surveillance could land kids in gang databases and families in deportation proceedings.”)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Intercept: School Officials Welcome Homeland Security Surveillance After Student Fights

techdirt: Institute For Justice Survey Shows How Philadelphia’s Forfeiture Program Preyed On Poor Minorities

techdirt: Institute For Justice Survey Shows How Philadelphia’s Forfeiture Program Preyed On Poor Minorities (“The Institute for Justice managed to kill off most of Philadelphia’s severely abused civil forfeiture program in 2018. Litigation resulted in a consent decree that banned law enforcement from seizing … Continue reading →

Posted in Forfeiture | Comments Off on techdirt: Institute For Justice Survey Shows How Philadelphia’s Forfeiture Program Preyed On Poor Minorities

Reason: SCOTUS Has Made It Practically Impossible To Sue a Rights-Violating Federal Officer

Reason: SCOTUS Has Made It Practically Impossible To Sue a Rights-Violating Federal Officer by Damon Root (“Several recent Supreme Court decisions have made it practically impossible to sue a federal officer over alleged violations of constitutional rights. Now the Court … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force | Comments Off on Reason: SCOTUS Has Made It Practically Impossible To Sue a Rights-Violating Federal Officer

IN: Knock-and-talk not barred by Jardines

DNA from a cold case murder was sent to a DNA genealogy company who tentatively matched defendant to the crime. Police did a trash pull and got more of a DNA match. Then they got a search warrant for his … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Curtilage, Knock and talk, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on IN: Knock-and-talk not barred by Jardines

WA: HIPAA violation in seizing medical records by SW required their return

The trial court’s order denying return of patient records taken by search warrant from the petitioner youth services provider failed to comply with HIPAA requirements should have been granted. While the records have been returned and the case is otherwise … Continue reading →

Posted in Privileges, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Standing, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d) | Comments Off on WA: HIPAA violation in seizing medical records by SW required their return

D.N.M.: Modified civil investigative demand wasn’t shown to be unreasonable

The petitioner doesn’t show that the civil investigative demand in a fraud case was unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment or that it could not reach accommodation with the government. In re Civil Investigative Demand No. 21mc24 WJ/SCY, 2021 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Excessive force, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Modified civil investigative demand wasn’t shown to be unreasonable