Author Archives: Hall

CA2: SW said “electronics” and “passwords” to access them, but it did not say “computers”; those words mean computers

The search warrant used the word “electronics” and “passwords” to access them, but it did not say “computers.” “Because the warrant specifically permitted seizure of “electronics,” a category into which computers and tablets would fall under the plain text, not … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, School searches, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA2: SW said “electronics” and “passwords” to access them, but it did not say “computers”; those words mean computers

W.D.Ky.: Female prison guard seeing ptf on toilet during count didn’t violate 4A

The fact a female prison guard saw the male plaintiff inmate sitting on a toilet during count didn’t violate his Fourth Amendment rights. Sublett v. Hall, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 241273 (W.D.Ky. Dec. 17, 2021).* No reasonable jury could conclude … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Female prison guard seeing ptf on toilet during count didn’t violate 4A

KY: Seeking consent to search car by threatening to use drug dog unreasonably extended stop

Defendant was stopped for a traffic offense, but the officer readily abandoned it by seeking consent and “repeatedly threatened the use of a dog sniff” if he didn’t. Commonwealth v. Conner, 2021 Ky. LEXIS 419 (Dec. 16, 2021):

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on KY: Seeking consent to search car by threatening to use drug dog unreasonably extended stop

D.Del.: 4A child seizure claim requires the child be a party

A Fourth Amendment child seizure claim requires the child be a party, even if the parents assert the child’s rights. Spahr v. Collins, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 241127 (D.Del. Dec. 17, 2021). Defendant in his 2255 cannot show defense counsel … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Franks doctrine, Seizure, Standing | Comments Off on D.Del.: 4A child seizure claim requires the child be a party

CA4: When POs knocked for a probation visit, sounds from inside gave RS for probation search

“Wimer contends that the probation officers who visited his home lacked reasonable suspicion to search his person. We find that, based on the totality of the circumstances, the officers had reasonable suspicion to search him. At the outset of the … Continue reading →

Posted in Private search, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA4: When POs knocked for a probation visit, sounds from inside gave RS for probation search

CA1: Visitor’s backpack could be searched during a drug raid with SW

Appellant was a visitor with a backpack on the premises when a search warrant was executed, and the backpack was searched. The search was valid. “That Congo was not identified in the warrant as a co-conspirator is simply not relevant … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion, Scope of search | Comments Off on CA1: Visitor’s backpack could be searched during a drug raid with SW

NY Queens: Cell phone SW with no time restriction overbroad

The search warrant for defendant’s cell phone sought everything on it when a limited time period was at issue. The law is settled in New York. “Here, the search warrant issued allows for an essentially unrestrained search of defendant’s cell … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on NY Queens: Cell phone SW with no time restriction overbroad

Cal.3: Smell of burnt MJ from car not PC in California

The smell of burnt marijuana coming from a car in California isn’t probable cause. Blakes v. Superior Court, 2021 Cal. App. LEXIS 1057 (3d Dist. Nov. 24, 2021) (published Dec. 16, 2021). Officers had probable cause for the automobile exception … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Excessive force, Probable cause | Comments Off on Cal.3: Smell of burnt MJ from car not PC in California

CA8 again grants QI to stopping innocent persons at gunpoint

The Eighth Circuit again holds that stopping innocent persons at gunpoint with almost any reason at all almost always results in qualified immunity for the officer. Irvin v. Richardson, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 37110 (8th Cir. Dec. 16, 2021):

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA8 again grants QI to stopping innocent persons at gunpoint

W.D.La.: In a § 1983 suit over a SW, informer privilege prevents disclosure here

In a § 1983 suit over a search warrant, the defendants plead informer privilege to prevent disclosure of the CI that led to the search. Denied. Informant privilege stronger in civil cases than criminal. There was also significant other information … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on W.D.La.: In a § 1983 suit over a SW, informer privilege prevents disclosure here

E.D.Ky.: Order for palmprints from indicted def requires RS

The government sought palmprints from this indicted defendant to compare to palmprints on boxes that were recovered in an investigation. The court concludes under Davis v. Mississippi (1969) and Hayes v. Florida (1985) that the standard is reasonable suspicion to … Continue reading →

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Order for palmprints from indicted def requires RS

D.D.C.: New 4A issues in reply brief are normally waived

After a motion to suppress was filed and briefed and the government responded, new issues in the reply brief are usually treated as waived. Here, however, the court will let him proceed on those issues and he can file a … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Immigration arrests, Waiver | Comments Off on D.D.C.: New 4A issues in reply brief are normally waived

CA5: There was PC for defendant’s arrest; a typo in when the SW was served doesn’t make a § 1983 claim

Plaintiff “Xie worked as a professor and researcher at MDA for several years.” MDA believed he computer manipulated a document submitted to the state for expense reimbursement and opened an investigation. That led to search warrants for his electronics. There … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA5: There was PC for defendant’s arrest; a typo in when the SW was served doesn’t make a § 1983 claim

D.D.C.: CI’s single controlled buy off def was PC

A single controlled buy from defendant’s home is probable cause without additional corroboration. Moreover, the CI had worked for MPD for a decade. United States v. Hill, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 238824 (D.D.C. Dec. 14, 2021). The fire department responded … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Informant hearsay, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on D.D.C.: CI’s single controlled buy off def was PC

D.Idaho: Fact of app on cell phone that deletes photos when viewed doesn’t undermine PC for them

The court issued a search warrant for defendant’s cell phone for photographs of nude minors. The fact he had an account that allegedly deleted pictures when they were viewed doesn’t undermine the probable cause. United States v. Young, 2021 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Idaho: Fact of app on cell phone that deletes photos when viewed doesn’t undermine PC for them

S.D.W.Va.: Officers can’t claim exigency for def’s response to false assertion they had a SW

Officers can’t falsely claim they have a search warrant and then use the target’s response to claim exigency for a warrantless entry into a home. United States v. Lark, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 238720 (S.D.W.Va. Dec. 14, 2021):

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: Officers can’t claim exigency for def’s response to false assertion they had a SW

OH6: No standing in a package stopped in transit where def’s name not anywhere on it

Defendant lacked standing to contest the detention of a package in transit in the Post Office because he was neither shown as the addressee nor the recipient. Even so, there was reasonable suspicion to detain the package. The dog sniff … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Mail and packages, Probation / Parole search, Standing | Comments Off on OH6: No standing in a package stopped in transit where def’s name not anywhere on it

D.Kan.: § 1983 case over bad faith prosecution and search of cell phone barred by Younger

Plaintiff sued under § 1983 claiming that his prosecution is proceeding in bad faith and that his cell phone was wrongfully seized and searched. This is all barred by Younger v. Harris. Kabutu v. Short, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 238360 … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion, Protective sweep, Standing | Comments Off on D.Kan.: § 1983 case over bad faith prosecution and search of cell phone barred by Younger

CA6: Officer routinely asking “about drugs, weapons, and dead bodies” during traffic stops doesn’t unreasonably extend them

Officer “Mathieson testified that it is his habit to ask about drugs, weapons, and dead bodies during traffic stops. In any event, police officers are permitted to stop a vehicle for a traffic violation and look for evidence of a … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA6: Officer routinely asking “about drugs, weapons, and dead bodies” during traffic stops doesn’t unreasonably extend them

CA6: 2254 petitioner’s argument state court “did not squarely address” his 4A argument still barred by Stone

“Tippins does not dispute that the state courts provided him a mechanism by which to present his Fourth Amendment claim. He instead argues that because the state courts did not squarely address the cases he raised on direct appeal, Powell … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion | Comments Off on CA6: 2254 petitioner’s argument state court “did not squarely address” his 4A argument still barred by Stone