Author Archives: Hall

C.D.Cal.: 2254 petr’s choice of remedy in state court still subject to Stone bar

2254 petitioner chose to attempt to exclude cell phone evidence in his state trial based on the claim it was not timely turned over and not that it was illegally seized. That was his choice, and the state did not … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: 2254 petr’s choice of remedy in state court still subject to Stone bar

Techdirt: Boston Police Department Used Forfeiture Funds To Hide Purchase Of Surveillance Tech From City Reps

Techdirt: Boston Police Department Used Forfeiture Funds To Hide Purchase Of Surveillance Tech From City Reps by Tim Cushing (“We’ve seen this happen (obviously months or years after the fact thanks to the secretive source of funds) in some of … Continue reading →

Posted in Forfeiture | Comments Off on Techdirt: Boston Police Department Used Forfeiture Funds To Hide Purchase Of Surveillance Tech From City Reps

E.D.Mich.: Prosecutor allegedly drafting false affidavit without PC not absolutely immune

A prosecutor allegedly drafting a false affidavit without probable cause for arrest warrant has no absolute immunity. There is no absolute immunity for drafting questions for a witness interview by another that explicitly avoids exculpatory information. Macmaster v. Busacca, 2021 … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Prosecutor allegedly drafting false affidavit without PC not absolutely immune

OR: Exigency for automobile exception has to exist at the time of search; telephonic warrant preferred

Oregon Supreme Court holds that the exigency for an automobile exception search under the state constitution must actually exist at the time of the search. The per se rule from 1986’s Brown case is overruled. Technological changes and statute since … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, State constitution | Comments Off on OR: Exigency for automobile exception has to exist at the time of search; telephonic warrant preferred

TX5: Knowledge def regularly deleted info from cell phone was exigency for seizure

The officers had information that defendant routinely deleted information from his call logs and text messages. That was exigency for a warrantless seizure of the phone. A later warrant was obtained for the phone. Veal v. State, 2021 Tex. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Emergency / exigency, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on TX5: Knowledge def regularly deleted info from cell phone was exigency for seizure

OH11: 4A doesn’t require alternative arrangements to towing be offered

The Fourth Amendment does not require that a motorist who’s car is about to be towed and would be inventoried can make alternative arrangements to avoid the tow. State v. Patterson, 2021-Ohio-4617, 2021 Ohio App. LEXIS 4542 (11th Dist. Dec. … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on OH11: 4A doesn’t require alternative arrangements to towing be offered

CA11: Just saying something is clearly established doesn’t make it so for QI

Just saying something is clearly established doesn’t make it so for qualified immunity. “Stallworth has not met her burden. Although Stallworth argues that Hurst violated her ‘clearly established rights,’ she has not presented a case with materially similar facts, demonstrated … Continue reading →

Posted in Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Just saying something is clearly established doesn’t make it so for QI

D.N.M.: Def in a make of car he was prone to steal one hour after its theft was RS

The officer had reasonable suspicion on the totality to detain defendant for car theft. Defendant had a general reputation for that in the community. United States v. Madrigal, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 247007 (D.N.M. Dec. 28, 2021)* [one of those … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Def in a make of car he was prone to steal one hour after its theft was RS

D.D.C.: Being “wide eyed” and evading police when seeing them isn’t RS

Defendant getting wide eyed on seeing police and then hiding from them understandably would get their attention, but it’s not reasonable suspicion. United States v. Winecoff, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 248279 (D.D.C. Dec. 30, 2021):

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Being “wide eyed” and evading police when seeing them isn’t RS

D.Neb.: “Defendant’s own characteristics show his consent was voluntary.”

“Defendant’s own characteristics show his consent was voluntary. Defendant was an adult and conversed easily with officers prior to the search. He appeared to be at least of average intelligence. Defendant’s answers to the officer’s questions and his overall demeanor … Continue reading →

Posted in Voluntariness | Comments Off on D.Neb.: “Defendant’s own characteristics show his consent was voluntary.”

N.D.Fla.: § 2241 habeas can’t be used to review another USDJ’s denial of a motion to suppress

A defendant can’t use a 2241 habeas as a way to appeal denial of a motion to suppress by another district judge. Butler v. Cook, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 247876 (N.D.Fla. Nov. 30, 2021). Controlled buys from defendant a few … Continue reading →

Posted in Motion to suppress, Probable cause, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on N.D.Fla.: § 2241 habeas can’t be used to review another USDJ’s denial of a motion to suppress

N.D.Ohio: Def’s psychotherapist reported he was viewing CP; 4A does not prohibit using it in SW application

The psychotherapist-patient privilege does not bar use of a report from defendant’s psychotherapist to law enforcement that defendant admitted viewing child pornography. The psychotherapist discussed with others and concluded that a report was necessary. Whatever the privilege for trial, it … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Privileges, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Def’s psychotherapist reported he was viewing CP; 4A does not prohibit using it in SW application

CA5: NCMEC not public actor, but its search didn’t exceed private search

NCMEC is not a government actor for Fourth Amendment purposes. Even if it was, its search did not exceed that of the private searcher that forwarded the information to it. “Because Meals has not carried his burden concerning NCMEC’s participation … Continue reading →

Posted in Private search, Probation / Parole search, Standing | Comments Off on CA5: NCMEC not public actor, but its search didn’t exceed private search

D.N.M.: In Torres v. Madrid on remand, defs get QI; right not clearly established in 2014

Torres v. Madrid, 141 S. Ct. 989 (2021) on remand: Defendants get qualified immunity because it wasn’t clearly established in 2014 that a shooting was an arrest. Torres v. Madrid, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 248358 (D.N.M. Dec. 30, 2021). [Once … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on D.N.M.: In Torres v. Madrid on remand, defs get QI; right not clearly established in 2014

D.Mass.: SW for def’s old car and iPhone on two-year-old information they were maybe connected to a murder was stale and probative of little; no GFE either

There was no probable cause for the search of defendant’s house for evidence of a nearly two-year-old murder. Even if what was sought was there, it was highly unlikely it would prove anything. Finally, the probable cause was so lacking … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Staleness | Comments Off on D.Mass.: SW for def’s old car and iPhone on two-year-old information they were maybe connected to a murder was stale and probative of little; no GFE either

MT: When def asserts right to a SW on curtilage, deputy should have left if no exigency

When a sheriff’s deputy came on the curtilage to talk to defendant, defendant asserted his right to a warrant and refused to talk to him. While there were no No Trespassing signs, defendant’s assertion was enough to manifest his reasonable … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on MT: When def asserts right to a SW on curtilage, deputy should have left if no exigency

EFF: In 2021, the Police Took a Page Out of the NSA’s Playbook: 2021 in Review

EFF: In 2021, the Police Took a Page Out of the NSA’s Playbook: 2021 in Review by Jennifer Lynch:

Posted in geofence | Comments Off on EFF: In 2021, the Police Took a Page Out of the NSA’s Playbook: 2021 in Review

IN: Even with a typo in the address of the place to be searched in the warrant, the correct otherwise particularly described place was searched

The address on the search warrant was wrong, but the physical description for defendant’s place was different than place with the wrong address. Defendant’s place was the target and it was searched under the warrant. The search warrant was sufficiently … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Particularity, Voluntariness, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on IN: Even with a typo in the address of the place to be searched in the warrant, the correct otherwise particularly described place was searched

PA: With MMJ, smell of MJ from a car alone is not PC for a vehicle search

Pennsylvania is a medical marijuana state. “Like the Superior Court, we hold that the smell of marijuana may be a factor, but not a stand-alone one, in determining whether the totality of the circumstances established probable cause to permit a … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on PA: With MMJ, smell of MJ from a car alone is not PC for a vehicle search

MN: Mere violation of pretrial release conditions not otherwise a crime not RS to extend a traffic stop

An alleged violation of conditions of pretrial release that is not criminal activity does not support extending a traffic stop without reasonable suspicion of an actual crime. State v. Sargent, 2021 Minn. LEXIS 672 (Dec. 29, 2021) (under state constitution):

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MN: Mere violation of pretrial release conditions not otherwise a crime not RS to extend a traffic stop