N.D.Fla.: § 2241 habeas can’t be used to review another USDJ’s denial of a motion to suppress

A defendant can’t use a 2241 habeas as a way to appeal denial of a motion to suppress by another district judge. Butler v. Cook, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 247876 (N.D.Fla. Nov. 30, 2021).

Controlled buys from defendant a few weeks early is probable cause for a vehicle search. United States v. Younglove, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 247869 (S.D.Fla. Dec. 15, 2021),*

The officer here encountered defendants asleep in a car in the parking lot of a public housing project. They said they were looking for a place to stay, but there was no motel nearby. Neither had a DL, so how did the car get there? Routine questions led to the belief the car was stolen, and that justified a patdown. The gun found is not suppressed. United States v. Conley, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 247323 (E.D.Mo. Nov. 22, 2021),* adopted, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 246564 (E.D.Mo. Dec. 28, 2021).*

This entry was posted in Motion to suppress, Probable cause, Stop and frisk. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.